{"id":93272,"date":"2025-11-28T00:22:52","date_gmt":"2025-11-27T23:22:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=93272"},"modified":"2025-11-27T14:17:59","modified_gmt":"2025-11-27T13:17:59","slug":"adam-caloud-koudelka-a-bis-jako-hrozba-pro-pluralitni-demokracii-v-cr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2025\/11\/28\/adam-caloud-koudelka-a-bis-jako-hrozba-pro-pluralitni-demokracii-v-cr\/","title":{"rendered":"Adam \u010caloud: Koudelka a BIS jako hrozba pro pluralitn\u00ed demokracii v \u010cR"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed informa\u010dn\u00ed slu\u017eba m\u00e1 st\u00e1t chr\u00e1nit \u2013 ne \u0159\u00eddit. P\u0159esto se v\u00a0posledn\u00edch letech pr\u00e1v\u011b BIS a\u00a0jej\u00ed \u0159editel Michal Koudelka stali jedn\u011bmi z\u00a0nejvlivn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch hr\u00e1\u010d\u016f \u010desk\u00e9 politiky. Zpravodajsk\u00e1 slu\u017eba pod jeho veden\u00edm p\u0159ekro\u010dila hranice profesion\u00e1ln\u00ed neutrality a\u00a0prom\u011bnila se v\u00a0instituci, kter\u00e1 ur\u010duje, kdo je p\u0159\u00edtel a\u00a0kdo nikoliv.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Kdy\u017e se v\u00a0roce 2021 bl\u00ed\u017eil konec Milo\u0161e Zemana v\u00a0prezidentsk\u00e9m \u00fa\u0159adu a\u00a0z\u00e1rove\u0148 vznikala nov\u00e1 vl\u00e1da veden\u00e1 Petrem Fialou, mohlo se zd\u00e1t, \u017ee dlouholet\u00fd spor o\u00a0\u0161\u00e9fa BIS kone\u010dn\u011b skon\u010d\u00ed. Prezident dal opakovan\u011b najevo, \u017ee Michala Koudelku pova\u017euje za \u010dlov\u011bka, kter\u00fd p\u0159ekra\u010duje z\u00e1kon, manipuluje s\u00a0informacemi, a\u00a0dokonce ohro\u017euje \u00fastavn\u00ed po\u0159\u00e1dek. O\u010dek\u00e1valo se proto, \u017ee nov\u00e1 vl\u00e1da, kter\u00e1 si zakl\u00e1dala na transparentnosti a\u00a0respektu k\u00a0pr\u00e1vn\u00edmu st\u00e1tu, situaci vy\u0159e\u0161\u00ed. Nestalo se.<\/p>\n

Jak n\u00e1m Fiala uk\u00e1zal Koudelkovu nedotknutelnost<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00fdm momentem byla sch\u016fzka, o\u00a0n\u00ed\u017e pozd\u011bji hovo\u0159il s\u00e1m Milo\u0161 Zeman. P\u0159\u00edtomni byli tehdej\u0161\u00ed designovan\u00fd premi\u00e9r Petr Fiala a\u00a0ministr spravedlnosti Pavel Bla\u017eek. Zeman jim tehdy \u2013 za \u00fa\u010dasti dvou zku\u0161en\u00fdch d\u016fstojn\u00edk\u016f zpravodajsk\u00fdch slu\u017eeb \u2013 zprost\u0159edkoval informace, kter\u00e9 podle v\u0161eho m\u011bly z\u00e1sadn\u00ed dopad na Koudelkovo setrv\u00e1n\u00ed ve funkci. Jak vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 ze sv\u011bdectv\u00ed, oba tito mu\u017ei, popsan\u00ed jako respektovan\u00ed profesion\u00e1lov\u00e9 s\u00a0dlouholetou prax\u00ed, p\u0159edlo\u017eili Fialovi a\u00a0Bla\u017ekovi d\u016fkazy o\u00a0z\u00e1va\u017en\u00e9m chov\u00e1n\u00ed \u0159editele BIS v\u00a0jeho soukrom\u00e9m \u017eivot\u011b \u2013 chov\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00e9 se podle jejich slov \u201eneslu\u010duje s\u00a0v\u00fdkonem takto citliv\u00e9 funkce\u201c.<\/p>\n

Podle zdroj\u016f, kter\u00e9 byly s\u00a0obsahem sch\u016fzky obezn\u00e1meny, \u0161lo o\u00a0z\u00e1le\u017eitosti mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u011b choulostiv\u00e9, potenci\u00e1ln\u011b vyd\u00edrateln\u00e9. V\u0161ichni p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00ed byli \u00fadajn\u011b v\u00a0\u0161oku. Informace se t\u00fdkaly besti\u00e1ln\u00edho obt\u011b\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed pod\u0159\u00edzen\u00e9 ze strany Koudelky, co\u017e vy\u00fastilo v\u00a0trval\u00e9 psychick\u00e9 n\u00e1sledky po\u0161kozen\u00e9. Navzdory \u0161okovan\u00e9 Fialov\u011b reakci z\u016fstal Koudelka ve funkci, a\u00a0nejen to, jeho mand\u00e1t byl dokonce prodlou\u017een. Na ja\u0159e 2023 si z\u00a0rukou nov\u00e9ho prezidenta Petra Pavla p\u0159evzal vytou\u017eenou gener\u00e1lskou hodnost, kterou mu Zeman po cel\u00e1 l\u00e9ta odm\u00edtal ud\u011blit.<\/p>\n

Tento okam\u017eik byl symbolick\u00fd. Fiala i\u00a0Bla\u017eek v\u011bd\u011bli o\u00a0z\u00e1va\u017en\u00fdch v\u00fdhrad\u00e1ch, p\u0159esto Koudelkovi otev\u0159eli dve\u0159e k\u00a0form\u00e1ln\u00edmu potvrzen\u00ed moci. Premi\u00e9r p\u0159itom m\u011bl k\u00a0jeho osob\u011b sv\u00e9 v\u00fdhrady \u2013 jak vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 z\u00a0informac\u00ed z\u00a0okruhu vl\u00e1dy, vadila mu Koudelkova ok\u00e1zalost, p\u0159ebujel\u00e9 ego i\u00a0neust\u00e1l\u00e1 medi\u00e1ln\u00ed sebeprezentace. Fiala \u00fadajn\u011b podmi\u0148oval jeho setrv\u00e1n\u00ed z\u00e1vazkem, \u017ee \u201esvoji viditelnost omez\u00ed\u201c. To se nikdy nestalo. \u0158editel BIS i\u00a0nad\u00e1le vystupoval na ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch konferenc\u00edch, \u00fa\u010dastnil se debat, komentoval politick\u00e9 d\u011bn\u00ed \u2013 a\u00a0premi\u00e9r to ti\u0161e trp\u011bl. Pro\u010d asi? \u017de by kampeli\u010dka, nebo je\u0161t\u011b n\u011bco dal\u0161\u00edho?<\/p>\n

T\u00edmto krokem Fiala \u2013 z\u0159ejm\u011b necht\u011bn\u011b \u2013 potvrdil, \u017ee Koudelka je v\u00a0\u010desk\u00e9m syst\u00e9mu prakticky nedotknuteln\u00fd. Zat\u00edmco jin\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00ed \u010dinitel\u00e9 mohou b\u00fdt za jak\u00fdkoliv proh\u0159e\u0161ek okam\u017eit\u011b odstaveni, \u0159editel BIS se stal figurou, kterou si netroufne nikdo odvolat. A\u00a0d\u016fvod? Na ka\u017ed\u00e9ho m\u00e1, nebo si vyrob\u00ed, likvida\u010dn\u00ed kompro! Fial\u016fv kabinet, kter\u00fd m\u011bl podle sv\u00fdch slov \u201eobnovit d\u016fv\u011bru v\u00a0instituce\u201c, se t\u00edmto rozhodnut\u00edm ocitl v\u00a0paradoxn\u00ed situaci: potvrdil ve funkci mu\u017ee, o\u00a0n\u011bm\u017e existuj\u00ed v\u00e1\u017en\u00e9 pochybnosti nejen mor\u00e1ln\u00ed, ale i\u00a0bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed. A\u00a0pr\u00e1v\u011b to vyvolalo ot\u00e1zku, zda \u010desk\u00fd premi\u00e9r skute\u010dn\u011b \u0159\u00edd\u00ed st\u00e1t, nebo zda se stal rukojm\u00edm syst\u00e9mu, v\u00a0n\u011bm\u017e m\u00e1 tajn\u00e1 slu\u017eba v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed moc ne\u017e vl\u00e1da samotn\u00e1.<\/p>\n

BIS jako samostatn\u00e1 mocensk\u00e1 struktura<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Kdy\u017e se pod\u00edv\u00e1me na v\u00fdvoj BIS za posledn\u00ed dek\u00e1du, nelze se zbavit dojmu, \u017ee instituce, kter\u00e1 m\u011bla b\u00fdt kontroln\u00edm n\u00e1strojem st\u00e1tu, se stala jedn\u00edm z\u00a0jeho nejmocn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch a\u00a0z\u00e1rove\u0148 nejm\u00e9n\u011b kontrolovan\u00fdch subjekt\u016f. Zpravodajsk\u00e1 slu\u017eba m\u00e1 podle z\u00e1kona jasn\u011b vymezen\u00fd r\u00e1mec \u2013 sb\u00edrat, analyzovat a\u00a0p\u0159ed\u00e1vat informace vl\u00e1d\u011b a\u00a0prezidentovi. Nem\u00e1 vykl\u00e1dat z\u00e1kony, nem\u00e1 zasahovat do politiky, a\u00a0u\u017e v\u016fbec nem\u00e1 vytv\u00e1\u0159et ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 m\u00edn\u011bn\u00ed. Jen\u017ee praxe za Michala Koudelky se od t\u011bchto princip\u016f vzd\u00e1lila na m\u00edle daleko.<\/p>\n

Koudelka prom\u011bnil BIS v\u00a0instituci, kter\u00e1 za\u010dala vystupovat jako mor\u00e1ln\u00ed arbitr a\u00a0ideologick\u00fd vyklada\u010d bezpe\u010dnosti. V\u00fdro\u010dn\u00ed zpr\u00e1vy slu\u017eby se staly politick\u00fdm manifestem \u2013 opakovalo se v\u00a0nich tot\u00e9\u017e: Rusko, \u010c\u00edna, dezinformace, hybridn\u00ed hrozby. P\u0159esto\u017ee konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed d\u016fkazy o\u00a0skute\u010dn\u00e9 \u0161pion\u00e1\u017en\u00ed \u010dinnosti \u010dasto chyb\u011bly nebo z\u016fstaly neve\u0159ejn\u00e9, medi\u00e1ln\u00ed dopad byl obrovsk\u00fd. BIS ur\u010dovala, kdo je \u201ebezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed riziko\u201c, kdo je \u201esympatizant nep\u0159\u00e1telsk\u00e9 moci\u201c a\u00a0kdo \u201eohro\u017euje st\u00e1t\u201c.<\/p>\n

Tento posun od faktick\u00e9 anal\u00fdzy ke zna\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed nep\u0159\u00e1tel m\u011bl z\u00e1sadn\u00ed dopad. Tajn\u00e1 slu\u017eba se stala nejen partnerem vl\u00e1dy, ale i\u00a0jej\u00edm neviditeln\u00fdm cenzorem. Politici, kte\u0159\u00ed si dovolili vyj\u00e1d\u0159it pochybnost o\u00a0\u010dinnosti BIS, byli okam\u017eit\u011b obvi\u0148ov\u00e1ni z\u00a0prorusk\u00fdch \u010di prokremelsk\u00fdch postoj\u016f. BIS se t\u00edm zbavila jak\u00e9koliv ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 kontroly \u2013 ka\u017ed\u00fd jej\u00ed kritik byl automaticky pova\u017eov\u00e1n za ohro\u017een\u00ed n\u00e1rodn\u00ed bezpe\u010dnosti.<\/p>\n

Ne\u0161lo p\u0159itom jen o\u00a0r\u00e9toriku. Slu\u017eba za\u010dala zasahovat i\u00a0do oblast\u00ed, kter\u00e9 s\u00a0jej\u00ed \u010dinnost\u00ed nem\u011bly nic spole\u010dn\u00e9ho \u2013 nap\u0159\u00edklad do \u0161kolstv\u00ed. V\u00a0roce 2018 se v\u00a0jedn\u00e9 ze zpr\u00e1v objevila formulace, \u017ee v\u00fduka \u010desk\u00fdch d\u011bjin je \u201eovlivn\u011bna sov\u011btsk\u00fdm pohledem\u201c a\u00a0m\u011bla by b\u00fdt \u201ep\u0159epracov\u00e1na\u201c, proto\u017ee m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed \u201erusk\u00e9 hybridn\u00ed strategie\u201c. Takto odv\u00e1\u017en\u00e1 interpretace vyvolala odpor historik\u016f i\u00a0pedagog\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed ji ozna\u010dili za ideologickou manipulaci. BIS v\u0161ak trvala na sv\u00e9m. T\u00edm uk\u00e1zala, \u017ee Koudelkova slu\u017eba chce ovliv\u0148ovat kulturn\u00ed a\u00a0vzd\u011bl\u00e1vac\u00ed r\u00e1mec zem\u011b, nikoliv jen br\u00e1nit jej\u00ed bezpe\u010dnost. M\u00edsto analytiky za\u010dala BIS fungovat jako politick\u00fd akt\u00e9r s\u00a0jasn\u011b vymezen\u00fdm ideov\u00fdm sm\u011brem \u2013 antirusk\u00fdm, proz\u00e1padn\u00edm, \u010dasto moralisticky vyhrocen\u00fdm.<\/p>\n

\u00daniky do m\u00e9di\u00ed a\u00a0\u010dtvrt\u00fd pil\u00ed\u0159 moci<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Z\u00e1rove\u0148 se st\u00e1le \u010dast\u011bji objevovaly informace o\u00a0\u00fanic\u00edch tajn\u00fdch materi\u00e1l\u016f do m\u00e9di\u00ed (Den\u00edk N, Respekt aj.), kter\u00e9 se opakovaly v\u00a0kauz\u00e1ch od Novi\u010doku p\u0159es Vrb\u011btice a\u017e po prezidentskou kancel\u00e1\u0159. V\u017edy sm\u011b\u0159ovaly stejn\u00fdm sm\u011brem \u2013 k\u00a0pos\u00edlen\u00ed obrazu BIS jako hrdinn\u00e9 obr\u00e1nkyn\u011b demokracie a\u00a0k\u00a0diskreditaci jej\u00edch kritik\u016f. Novin\u00e1\u0159i bl\u00edzc\u00ed slu\u017eb\u011b publikovali citliv\u00e9 detaily, kter\u00e9 mohli z\u00edskat pouze zevnit\u0159. P\u0159esto nikdy nedo\u0161lo k\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9mu vy\u0161et\u0159en\u00ed ani sankci.<\/p>\n

Ve\u0159ejnost tak byla dlouhodob\u011b vystavena jednostrann\u00e9mu obrazu: BIS jako z\u00e1ruka bezpe\u010dnosti, jej\u00ed odp\u016frci jako riziko. \u201eProre\u017eimn\u00ed\u201c politici tento r\u00e1mec p\u0159ejali, a\u00a0m\u00edsto aby slu\u017ebu kontrolovali, za\u010dali se na ni spol\u00e9hat. Tak se postupn\u011b vytratila z\u00e1kladn\u00ed z\u00e1sada pluralitn\u00ed demokracie \u2013 kontrola nevolen\u00fdch mocensk\u00fdch struktur volen\u00fdmi z\u00e1stupci lidu.<\/p>\n

Michal Koudelka se d\u00edky tomu stal jednou z\u00a0nejvlivn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch osobnost\u00ed v\u00a0zemi. Nevolen\u00fd \u00fa\u0159edn\u00edk, kter\u00fd se nemusel zodpov\u00eddat voli\u010d\u016fm, z\u00edskal faktick\u00fd vliv na politiku, m\u00e9dia i\u00a0ve\u0159ejnou debatu. A\u00a0p\u0159esto\u017ee se o\u00a0jeho postupu vedly diskuze i\u00a0mezi \u010dleny vl\u00e1dy, nikdo se neodv\u00e1\u017eil zas\u00e1hnout. V\u00a0o\u010d\u00edch mnoh\u00fdch se BIS prom\u011bnila v\u00a0\u201e\u010dtvrt\u00fd pil\u00ed\u0159 moci\u201c \u2013 neviditeln\u00fd, ale v\u0161udyp\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fd.<\/p>\n

A co dodat na z\u00e1v\u011br? Snad toto\u2026 \u010cesk\u00e1 republika stoj\u00ed p\u0159ed jednoduchou, ale z\u00e1sadn\u00ed ot\u00e1zkou: kdo v\u00a0t\u00e9to zemi skute\u010dn\u011b vl\u00e1dne? Jsou to volen\u00ed p\u0159edstavitel\u00e9, kte\u0159\u00ed nesou odpov\u011bdnost p\u0159ed ob\u010dany, nebo lid\u00e9 v\u00a0pozad\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed ovl\u00e1daj\u00ed informace, ale unikaj\u00ed jak\u00e9koliv kontrole? Pokud m\u00e1 b\u00fdt demokracie skute\u010dn\u011b pluralitn\u00ed, mus\u00ed se vr\u00e1tit k\u00a0principu, \u017ee tajn\u00e9 slu\u017eby slou\u017e\u00ed st\u00e1tu \u2013 nikoliv st\u00e1t tajn\u00fdm slu\u017eb\u00e1m. Jinak se m\u016f\u017ee st\u00e1t, \u017ee jm\u00e9na jako Michal Koudelka z\u016fstanou symbolem doby, kdy jsme ztratili kontrolu nad t\u00edm, kdo rozhoduje o\u00a0na\u0161em ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m prostoru.<\/p>\n

Adam \u010caloud<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n

\"Adam<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed informa\u010dn\u00ed slu\u017eba m\u00e1 st\u00e1t chr\u00e1nit \u2013 ne \u0159\u00eddit. P\u0159esto se v\u00a0posledn\u00edch letech pr\u00e1v\u011b BIS…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1180,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[10081,146,187,122],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93272"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93272"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93272\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1180"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}