{"id":71690,"date":"2025-02-06T00:46:16","date_gmt":"2025-02-05T23:46:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=71690"},"modified":"2025-02-05T17:51:55","modified_gmt":"2025-02-05T16:51:55","slug":"daniela-kovarova-aby-bylo-jasno-aneb-jak-jsme-hlasovali-o-lex-ukrajina","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2025\/02\/06\/daniela-kovarova-aby-bylo-jasno-aneb-jak-jsme-hlasovali-o-lex-ukrajina\/","title":{"rendered":"Daniela Kov\u00e1\u0159ov\u00e1: Aby bylo jasno aneb jak jsme hlasovali o Lex Ukrajina"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Ani trochu se v\u00e1m nediv\u00edm, \u017ee v\u00a0tom mnoz\u00ed nem\u00e1te jasno. Sen\u00e1tn\u00ed web je nep\u0159ehledn\u00fd, moder\u00e1tor (tedy zpravodaj sen\u00e1tn\u00edho tisku \u010d. 35 \u2013 novely z\u00e1kona \u010d. 65\/2022 Sb., kter\u00e1 prodlu\u017euje ochranu ukrajinsk\u00fdch uprchl\u00edk\u016f u n\u00e1s) hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed komentoval trochu zmaten\u011b a ani novin\u00e1\u0159i nepsali dostate\u010dn\u011b jasn\u011b o tom, co se vlastn\u011b minul\u00fd t\u00fdden v\u00a0Sen\u00e1t\u011b odehr\u00e1lo.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u017d\u00e1dn\u00fd div, \u017ee se tolik pt\u00e1te, \u017ee se div\u00edte, o \u010dem jsme to hlasovali a pro\u010d jsme se, proboha svat\u00e9ho, na ni\u010dem neshodli. Ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m prostoru panuje velk\u00fd zmatek v tom, kdo jak hlasoval a kdo co kdo vlastn\u011b podpo\u0159il.<\/p>\n

Tak\u017ee aby bylo jasno: n\u00e1vrh na prodlou\u017een\u00ed ochrany ukrajinsk\u00fdch uprchl\u00edk\u016f u n\u00e1s (proto\u017ee v\u00e1lka st\u00e1le pokra\u010duje) by patrn\u011b lehce Sen\u00e1tem pro\u0161el. Jenom\u017ee v\u00a0Poslaneck\u00e9 sn\u011bmovn\u011b k\u00a0n\u011bmu p\u0159i\u010dinliv\u00ed poslanci p\u0159idali\u00a0t\u0159i vysoce kontroverzn\u00ed pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrhy<\/b>: prvn\u00ed se t\u00fdkal p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed ukrajinsk\u00fdch\u00a0d\u011bt\u00ed do \u0161kol<\/b>\u00a0(zav\u00e1d\u011bl dvoustup\u0148ov\u00e9 p\u0159ij\u00edmac\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed jen pro mal\u00e9 Ukrajince, aby nep\u0159epl\u0148ovali zejm\u00e9na pra\u017esk\u00e9 z\u00e1kladn\u00ed \u0161koly), druh\u00fd \u0159e\u0161il\u00a0st\u00e1tn\u00ed ob\u010danstv\u00ed<\/b>\u00a0(zav\u00e1d\u011bl povinnost jen pro rusk\u00e9 ob\u010dany z\u0159\u00edci se sv\u00e9ho ob\u010danstv\u00ed p\u0159ed pod\u00e1n\u00edm \u017e\u00e1dosti o ob\u010danstv\u00ed \u010desk\u00e9) a t\u0159et\u00ed se t\u00fdkal novely trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kon\u00edku a tolik diskutovan\u00e9ho nov\u00e9ho trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu\u00a0Slu\u017eba pro ciz\u00ed moc\u00a0<\/b>(nov\u00fd \u00a7 381a tr. z\u00e1k.). Cel\u00fd n\u00e1vrh i s\u00a0p\u0159\u00edlepky najdete\u00a0zde<\/a><\/u>.<\/p>\n

Jak tedy po velmi dlouh\u00e9 a emotivn\u00ed diskusi hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed vypadalo? O tisku \u010d. 35 se (krom\u011b procesn\u00edch hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed) v\u011bcn\u011b hlasovalo celkem\u00a0osmkr\u00e1t<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Prvn\u00ed hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed (ozna\u010den\u00e9 na sen\u00e1tn\u00edm webu jako hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010d. 5) bylo o tom,\u00a0zda schv\u00e1lit n\u00e1vrh z\u00e1kona s\u00a0t\u011bmi t\u0159emi p\u0159\u00edlepky<\/b>, tedy ve zn\u011bn\u00ed postoupen\u00e9m Poslaneckou sn\u011bmovnou. Tento n\u00e1vrh byl zam\u00edtnut, proto\u017ee ze 73 p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fdch sen\u00e1tor\u016f pro n\u011bj hlasovalo 21 a proti bylo 27 (jmenn\u00fd seznam je\u00a0zde<\/a><\/u>). J\u00e1 jsem hlasovala proti. N\u00e1vrh v\u00a0t\u00e9to podob\u011b se t\u0159emi p\u0159\u00edlepky byl pro m\u011b absolutn\u011b nep\u0159ijateln\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Druh\u00e9 v\u011bcn\u00e9 hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed (ozna\u010den\u00e9 jako \u010d. 6) bylo o tom, zda n\u00e1vrh z\u00e1kona s\u00a0t\u011bmi p\u0159\u00edlepky chceme\u00a0zam\u00edtnout<\/b>. Av\u0161ak ani tento n\u00e1vrh nepro\u0161el, proto\u017ee ze 74 p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fdch sen\u00e1tor\u016f pro n\u011bj hlasovalo 15 a 47 bylo proti (jmenovit\u011b\u00a0zde<\/a><\/u>). J\u00e1 jsem se zdr\u017eela hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed, proto\u017ee jsem cht\u011bla dos\u00e1hnout vypu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed v\u0161ech t\u0159\u00ed p\u0159\u00edlepk\u016f, nikoliv z\u00e1kon v\u00a0tom pitom\u00e9m zn\u011bn\u00ed pouze zam\u00edtnout, a o p\u0159\u00edlepc\u00edch v\u016fbec nehlasovat.<\/p>\n

Pak jsme p\u0159ikro\u010dili k\u00a0hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed o pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00edch n\u00e1vrz\u00edch, co\u017e jsem si p\u0159\u00e1la.<\/p>\n

Prvn\u00ed pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrh (hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010d. 8) po\u017eadoval\u00a0vypustit p\u0159\u00edlepek o dvoustup\u0148ov\u00e9m p\u0159ij\u00edmac\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed na \u0161kol\u00e1ch<\/b>\u00a0v\u00fdlu\u010dn\u011b pro ukrajinsk\u00e9 d\u011bti. N\u00e1vrh nepro\u0161el, proto\u017ee ze 75 p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fdch sen\u00e1tor\u016f pro n\u011bj hlasovali jen 34 sen\u00e1to\u0159i (ale ke schv\u00e1len\u00ed n\u00e1s bylo pot\u0159eba 38), proti bylo 12 (jmenovit\u011b\u00a0zde<\/a><\/u>.). J\u00e1 jsem hlasovala pro vypu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed tohoto p\u0159\u00edlepku.<\/p>\n

Druh\u00fd pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrh (hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010d. 9) po\u017eadoval\u00a0vypustit diskrimina\u010dn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edlepek nut\u00edc\u00ed rusk\u00e9 ob\u010dany zbavit se sv\u00e9ho p\u016fvodn\u00edho ob\u010danstv\u00ed<\/b>. N\u00e1vrh tak\u00e9 nepro\u0161el, proto\u017ee ze 75 p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fdch sen\u00e1tor\u016f jich pro vypu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed tohoto p\u0159\u00edlepku hlasovalo 30, proti bylo 13 (jmenovit\u00e9 hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0zde<\/a><\/u>). J\u00e1 jsem hlasovala pro vypu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed i tohoto p\u0159\u00edlepku. Obecn\u011b m\u00e1m zato, \u017ee dvoj\u00ed ob\u010danstv\u00ed nem\u00e1 b\u00fdt p\u0159ipu\u0161t\u011bno u nikoho, ale ke vzd\u00e1n\u00ed se sv\u00e9ho ob\u010danstv\u00ed nelze podle m\u011b nutit jen Rusy \u017eij\u00edc\u00ed zde v exilu.<\/p>\n

T\u0159et\u00ed pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrh (hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010d. 10) po\u017eadoval upravit\u00a0<\/b>alespo\u0148\u00a0p\u0159echodn\u00e9 ustanoven\u00ed t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed ji\u017e prob\u00edhaj\u00edc\u00edch \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o p\u0159id\u011blen\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00edho ob\u010danstv\u00ed<\/b>. Ani tento n\u00e1vrh nepro\u0161el, proto\u017ee z\u00a075 p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fdch sen\u00e1tor\u016f hlasovalo pro 29, proti bylo 14 (jmenovit\u00e9 hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0zde<\/a><\/u>). Hlasovala jsem pro pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrh kv\u016fli pro m\u011b nep\u0159ijateln\u00e9 prav\u00e9 retroaktivit\u011b. Zm\u011bny podle m\u00e9ho p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den\u00ed maj\u00ed platit do budoucna, nikoliv zp\u011btn\u011b.<\/p>\n

Teprve \u010dtvrt\u00fd pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrh (hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed \u010d. 11) po\u017eadoval\u00a0vypu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed\u00a0<\/b>pro m\u011b nep\u0159ijateln\u00e9ho\u00a0gumov\u00e9ho trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu Slu\u017eba pro ciz\u00ed moc.<\/b>\u00a0N\u00e1vrh bohu\u017eel tak\u00e9 nepro\u0161el, proto\u017ee ze 75 p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fdch sen\u00e1tor\u016f hlasovalo 31 pro, proti bylo 22 (jmenovit\u00e9 hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0zde<\/a><\/u>). Hlasovala jsem pochopiteln\u011b pro vypu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed gumov\u00e9ho ustanoven\u00ed. Ale bylo n\u00e1s m\u00e1lo\u2026<\/p>\n

Posledn\u00ed v\u011bcn\u00e9 hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed (\u010d. 12) bylo o schv\u00e1len\u00ed\u00a0doprovodn\u00e9ho usnesen\u00ed<\/b>, kter\u00fdm Sen\u00e1t ukl\u00e1d\u00e1 vl\u00e1d\u011b l\u00e9pe zajistit organizaci p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed ukrajinsk\u00fdch d\u011bt\u00ed do z\u00e1kladn\u00edch \u0161kol. Toto jedin\u00e9 hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed bylo \u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e9. Ze 75 p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00fdch sen\u00e1tor\u016f podpo\u0159ilo doprovodn\u00e9 usnesen\u00ed 51, proti byl 1 (jmenovit\u00e9 hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0zde<\/a><\/u>). Usnesen\u00ed jsem podpo\u0159ila, proto\u017ee p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed d\u011bt\u00ed b\u011b\u017eenc\u016f do zejm\u00e9na pra\u017esk\u00fdch \u0161kol prov\u00e1zej\u00ed zmatky. Bohu\u017eel mnoz\u00ed bloge\u0159i pr\u00e1v\u011b toto hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed vyd\u00e1vaj\u00ed za hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed o cel\u00e9m z\u00e1kon\u011b nebo ho pova\u017euj\u00ed za hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed o on\u00e9 tzv. Slu\u017eb\u011b pro ciz\u00ed moc. To je ov\u0161em velk\u00e9 nedorozum\u011bn\u00ed nebo dokonce mo\u017en\u00e1 c\u00edlen\u00e1 manipulace.<\/p>\n

Mrz\u00ed m\u011b zmate\u010dnost, kterou schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed tohoto tisku v\u00a0Sen\u00e1t\u011b prov\u00e1zela a hodn\u011b lid\u00ed popletla. A d\u011bsn\u011b m\u011b mrz\u00ed, \u017ee se n\u00e1m nepoda\u0159ilo schv\u00e1lit \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrh a vyhodit t\u0159i ostudn\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edlepky, kter\u00e9 v\u00a0tom z\u00e1kon\u011b nemaj\u00ed co d\u011blat. Proto\u017ee se Sen\u00e1t neshodl v\u011bt\u0161inov\u011b na \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9m v\u011bcn\u00e9m rozhodnut\u00ed, v\u00fdsledkem cel\u00e9ho procesu bohu\u017eel je, \u017ee z\u00e1kon v\u00a0podob\u011b schv\u00e1len\u00e9 Poslaneckou sn\u011bmovnou te\u010f putuje k\u00a0prezidentovi, kter\u00fd ho vysoce pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b podep\u00ed\u0161e.<\/p>\n

Tak jsem zase jednou prohr\u00e1la, ale proti podobn\u00e9 legislativn\u00ed zv\u016fli budu vystupovat i v\u00a0budoucnu. A ono n\u00e1s n\u011bkdy p\u0159\u00ed\u0161t\u011b bude v\u00edc, aby to sta\u010dilo.<\/p>\n

JUDr. Daniela Kov\u00e1\u0159ov\u00e1<\/em><\/strong>
\nAutorka je nez\u00e1vislou sen\u00e1torkou a prezidentkou Unie rodinn\u00fdch advok\u00e1t\u016f<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ani trochu se v\u00e1m nediv\u00edm, \u017ee v\u00a0tom mnoz\u00ed nem\u00e1te jasno. Sen\u00e1tn\u00ed web je nep\u0159ehledn\u00fd, moder\u00e1tor…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":60989,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[1503,8554,164],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71690"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=71690"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71690\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60989"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=71690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=71690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=71690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}