{"id":69598,"date":"2025-01-06T00:33:40","date_gmt":"2025-01-05T23:33:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=69598"},"modified":"2025-01-05T16:37:44","modified_gmt":"2025-01-05T15:37:44","slug":"jan-schneider-protiustavni-soud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2025\/01\/06\/jan-schneider-protiustavni-soud\/","title":{"rendered":"Jan Schneider: Proti\u00fastavn\u00ed soud"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Jan Schneider, disident, signat\u00e1\u0159 Charty77, pozd\u011bji vysok\u00fd d\u016fstojn\u00edk vznikaj\u00edc\u00ed BIS, upozor\u0148uje na urv\u00e1lkovsk\u00e9 totalit\u00e1rn\u00ed m\u00f3resy \u00fastavn\u00edho soud. Je ostuda, \u017ee se za 35 let budov\u00e1n\u00ed demokratick\u00e9ho st\u00e1tu n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed na\u0161i spoluob\u010dan\u00e9 v tal\u00e1rech n\u00e1s vedou op\u011bt zp\u011bt na cestu k totalit\u011b.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud (\u00daS) 22.\u00a0\u0159\u00edjna 2024 sv\u00fdm usnesen\u00edm odm\u00edtl st\u00ed\u017enost Josefa Sk\u00e1ly, Vladim\u00edra Kapala a\u00a0Spolku Svobodn\u00e9 r\u00e1dio proti rozsudk\u016fm Obvodn\u00edho soudu pro Prahu 7 a\u00a0M\u011bstsk\u00e9ho soudu v\u00a0Praze, jimi\u017e byli podm\u00edne\u010dn\u011b odsouzeni za to, \u017ee<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201ena ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 internetov\u00e9 s\u00edti ve vz\u00e1jemn\u00e9 shod\u011b a\u00a0podpo\u0159e opakovan\u011b ve\u0159ejn\u011b odm\u00edtali, relativizovali a\u00a0zleh\u010dovali v\u00fdlu\u010dnou odpov\u011bdnost komunistick\u00e9ho Sov\u011btsk\u00e9ho svazu za tzv.\u00a0katy\u0148sk\u00fd masakr, jeho samotnou podstatu, rozsah a\u00a0pr\u016fb\u011bh v\u010detn\u011b ozna\u010den\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9ho pachatele, zp\u016fsob sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed masakru, ur\u010den\u00ed a\u00a0po\u010det ob\u011bt\u00ed uv\u00e1d\u011bn\u00edm nepravdiv\u00fdch, ne\u00fapln\u00fdch a\u00a0zkreslen\u00fdch skute\u010dnost\u00ed mimo jin\u00e9 s\u00a0\u00fa\u010delov\u00fdmi odkazy na \u00fadajn\u00e9 z\u00e1v\u011bry a\u00a0d\u016fkazy, kter\u00e9 vytvo\u0159il a\u00a0ji\u017e pou\u017eil Sov\u011btsk\u00fd svaz a\u00a0jin\u00e9 subjekty a\u00a0osoby v\u00a0jeho z\u00e1jmu k\u00a0zatajov\u00e1n\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9 viny, povahy a\u00a0rozsahu ud\u00e1lost\u00ed p\u0159ed p\u0159izn\u00e1n\u00edm odpov\u011bdnosti na nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed politick\u00e9 \u00farovni Sov\u011btsk\u00fdm svazem a\u00a0n\u00e1stupnickou Ruskou federac\u00ed v\u00a0letech 1990, 1992 a\u00a02010.\u201c<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

PODIVN\u00c9 MERITUM TRESTN\u00cdHO \u0158\u00cdZEN\u00cd<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud ve sv\u00e9m usnesen\u00ed v\u00a0bod\u011b 13 p\u00ed\u0161e, \u017ee se\u00a0\u201eodvolac\u00ed soud (stejn\u011b jako pot\u00e9 Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud) ztoto\u017enil s\u00a0postupem nal\u00e9zac\u00edho soudu, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e zd\u016fraznil, \u017ee p\u0159edm\u011btem trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed\u00a0nebylo<\/strong>\u00a0prok\u00e1zat, jak ke katy\u0148sk\u00e9mu masakru do\u0161lo a\u00a0kdo jej sp\u00e1chal,\u00a0ale to, \u017ee obvin\u011bn\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u011b rozhla\u0161ovali tvrzen\u00ed, kter\u00e1 odporuj\u00ed jednozna\u010dn\u00fdm historick\u00fdm zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00edm.<\/strong>\u00a0St\u011b\u017eovatel\u00e9 sice p\u0159ipou\u0161t\u011bli, \u017ee k\u00a0masakru do\u0161lo,\u00a0zpochyb\u0148ovali<\/strong>\u00a0v\u0161ak, \u017ee se ho dopustil jeho zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00fd pachatel a\u00a0dehonestovali jeho ob\u011bti. V\u00a0takov\u00e9 situaci, jak bylo soudy konstatov\u00e1no, se ji\u017e skute\u010dn\u011b jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0v\u011bdom\u00e9 roz\u0161i\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0nepravd<\/strong>, a\u00a0nikoliv o\u00a0snahu nal\u00e9zt objektivn\u00ed pravdu, jak tvrdili st\u011b\u017eovatel\u00e9. N\u00e1vrhy na dopln\u011bn\u00ed dokazov\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00fdslechy v\u00fd\u0161e citovan\u00fdch historik\u016f by ve v\u011bci nic nov\u00e9ho nemohly p\u0159in\u00e9st, a\u00a0jen by vedly k\u00a0pokra\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed exhibici st\u011b\u017eovatel\u016f ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m medi\u00e1ln\u00edm prostoru.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

\u010ctu podes\u00e1t\u00e9, ale st\u00e1le nev\u011b\u0159\u00edm sv\u00fdm o\u010d\u00edm! Za\u010dn\u011bme u\u00a0rozporupln\u00e9ho tvrzen\u00ed, \u017ee obvin\u011bn\u00ed zleh\u010dovali a\u00a0relativizovali n\u011bco, co pr\u00fd pop\u00edrali. Norm\u00e1ln\u00ed \u010dlov\u011bk v\u00ed, \u017ee to jde t\u011b\u017eko v\u0161echno dohromady \u2013 bu\u010f n\u011bco p\u0159ipou\u0161t\u00edm, t\u0159eba omezen\u011b, anebo to pop\u00edr\u00e1m. Anebo jak se roz\u0161i\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed pochybnost\u00ed najednou zm\u011bnilo v\u00a0roz\u0161i\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed nepravd, nota bene v\u011bdom\u00e9!<\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud je d\u00e1le v\u00a0evidentn\u00edm nesouladu s\u00a0rozsudky, kter\u00e9 cituje, proto\u017ee ty uv\u00e1d\u011bj\u00ed, \u017ee obvin\u011bn\u00ed\u00a0\u201eve\u0159ejn\u011b odm\u00edtali, relativizovali a\u00a0zleh\u010dovali v\u00fdlu\u010dnou odpov\u011bdnost komunistick\u00e9ho Sov\u011btsk\u00e9ho svazu za tzv.\u00a0katy\u0148sk\u00fd masakr, jeho samotnou podstatu, rozsah a\u00a0pr\u016fb\u011bh v\u010detn\u011b ozna\u010den\u00ed skute\u010dn\u00e9ho pachatele, zp\u016fsob sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed masakru, ur\u010den\u00ed a\u00a0po\u010det ob\u011bt\u00ed\u201c,<\/em>\u00a0kde\u017eto \u00dastavn\u00ed soud v\u00a0rozporu s\u00a0t\u00edm p\u00ed\u0161e, \u017ee\u00a0\u201ep\u0159edm\u011btem trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed\u00a0nebylo<\/strong>\u00a0prok\u00e1zat, jak ke katy\u0148sk\u00e9mu masakru do\u0161lo a\u00a0kdo jej sp\u00e1chal,\u201c<\/em>\u00a0n\u00fdbr\u017e \u017ee\u00a0\u201eobvin\u011bn\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u011b rozhla\u0161ovali tvrzen\u00ed, kter\u00e1 odporuj\u00ed jednozna\u010dn\u00fdm historick\u00fdm zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00edm\u201c\u00a0<\/em>!!!<\/strong><\/p>\n

Tady tedy v\u016fbec nejde o\u00a0Katy\u0148! Jde o\u00a0odpor proti \u201ejednozna\u010dn\u00fdm historick\u00fdm zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00edm\u201c! Ve\u0159ejn\u011b odporovat \u201ejednozna\u010dn\u00fdm historick\u00fdm zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00edm\u201c je v\u00a0t\u00e9to zemi trestn\u00e9!!! Cel\u00e1 tato ledabyl\u00e1, ale zlomocn\u00e1 slovn\u00ed sil\u00e1\u017e je produktem takzvan\u00e9ho \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu!<\/p>\n

Vzpom\u00edn\u00e1m, \u017ee neexistence \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu pat\u0159ila mezi disentem \u010dasto vzn\u00e1\u0161enou kritiku minul\u00e9ho re\u017eimu. Tehdy v\u0161ak nikdo netu\u0161il, jak a\u017e ne\u00fastavn\u00ed m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt \u010dinnost takzvan\u00e9ho \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu! P\u0159ipome\u0148me jen ned\u00e1vnou hnusnou ur\u00e1\u017eku v\u0161em d\u016fchodc\u016fm, kdy\u017e z\u00e1konnou valorizaci jejich d\u016fchod\u016f \u00dastavn\u00ed soud nazval hroz\u00edc\u00ed \u201e\u0161kodou\u201c st\u00e1tu, co\u017e podle n\u011bj \u010dinilo vyhl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed stavu legislativn\u00ed nouze \u201e\u00fastavn\u011b souladn\u00fdm\u201c!<\/p>\n

URV\u00c1LEK ST\u00c1LE \u017dIV\u00dd<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud zcela toleruje urv\u00e1lkovsk\u00e9 man\u00fdry zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fdch soud\u016f, kter\u00e9 subjektivn\u00ed str\u00e1nku \u00fadajn\u00e9ho trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu obvin\u011bn\u00fdch \u201edok\u00e1zaly\u201c nikoliv z jejich v\u00fdrok\u016f, ale svou \u2013 obvin\u011bn\u00fdm podsunutou \u2013 interpretac\u00ed (\u201eob\u017ealovan\u00fd sice \u0159ekl pouze toto, nicm\u00e9n\u011b t\u00edm myslel tamto a za to se odsuzuje \u2026\u201c).<\/p>\n

\u201eV takov\u00e9 situaci,\u201c<\/em>\u00a0p\u00ed\u0161e \u00dastavn\u00ed soud,\u00a0\u201ejak bylo soudy konstatov\u00e1no, se ji\u017e skute\u010dn\u011b jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0v\u011bdom\u00e9 roz\u0161i\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed nepravd, a\u00a0nikoliv o\u00a0snahu nal\u00e9zt objektivn\u00ed pravdu, jak tvrdili st\u011b\u017eovatel\u00e9.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud naprosto mimo jak\u00e9koliv sou\u0159adnice pr\u00e1vn\u00edho st\u00e1tu posv\u011bcuje omezen\u00ed \u00fastavn\u00edho pr\u00e1va na obhajobu. Zn\u00ed to takto:\u00a0\u201eN\u00e1vrhy na dopln\u011bn\u00ed dokazov\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00fdslechy v\u00fd\u0161e citovan\u00fdch historik\u016f by ve v\u011bci nic nov\u00e9ho nemohly p\u0159in\u00e9st, a\u00a0jen by vedly k\u00a0pokra\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed exhibici st\u011b\u017eovatel\u016f ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9m medi\u00e1ln\u00edm prostoru.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

Prvnizpravy.cz \u2013\u00a0Petr Sak: \u00dastavn\u00ed soud vydal vysv\u011bd\u010den\u00ed o\u00a0nevzd\u011blanosti soudc\u016f
\n<\/em><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

OKLE\u0160T\u011aN\u00c1 SVOBODA PROJEVU<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud d\u00e1le prohla\u0161uje za \u201elich\u00e9\u201c n\u00e1mitky st\u011b\u017eovatel\u016f, dovol\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00edch se pr\u00e1va na svobodu projevu.<\/p>\n

P\u0159ipome\u0148me v\u0161ak, \u017ee Listina z\u00e1kladn\u00edch pr\u00e1v a\u00a0svobod v\u00a0\u010dl. 17 stanov\u00ed, \u017ee (1) Svoboda projevu a\u00a0pr\u00e1vo na informace jsou zaru\u010deny; (2) Ka\u017ed\u00fd m\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo vyjad\u0159ovat sv\u00e9 n\u00e1zory slovem, p\u00edsmem, tiskem, obrazem nebo jin\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem, jako\u017e i\u00a0svobodn\u011b vyhled\u00e1vat, p\u0159ij\u00edmat a\u00a0roz\u0161i\u0159ovat ideje a\u00a0informace bez ohledu na hranice st\u00e1tu; (3) Cenzura je nep\u0159\u00edpustn\u00e1; (4) Svobodu projevu a\u00a0pr\u00e1vo vyhled\u00e1vat a\u00a0\u0161\u00ed\u0159it informace\u00a0lze omezit z\u00e1konem<\/strong>, jde-li o\u00a0opat\u0159en\u00ed v\u00a0demokratick\u00e9 spole\u010dnosti nezbytn\u00e1 pro ochranu pr\u00e1v a\u00a0svobod druh\u00fdch, bezpe\u010dnost st\u00e1tu, ve\u0159ejnou bezpe\u010dnost, ochranu ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho zdrav\u00ed a\u00a0mravnosti.<\/p>\n

Meze z\u00e1kladn\u00edch pr\u00e1v a\u00a0svobod mohou tedy b\u00fdt omezeny pouze z\u00e1konem za n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edch podm\u00ednek: jde-li o\u00a0ochranu pr\u00e1v a\u00a0svobod druh\u00fdch (co\u017e nebyl tento p\u0159\u00edpad), bezpe\u010dnost st\u00e1tu (co\u017e nebyl tento p\u0159\u00edpad), ve\u0159ejnou bezpe\u010dnost (co\u017e nebyl tento p\u0159\u00edpad), ochranu ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho zdrav\u00ed a\u00a0mravnosti (to tak\u00e9 nebyl tento p\u0159\u00edpad). Na nic z\u00a0toho se soudy ani nepokusily odk\u00e1zat \u2013 odsouzen\u00ed pouze m\u011bli tu sm\u011blost cosi zpochyb\u0148ovat, co\u017e v\u0161ak v\u00a0civilizovan\u00e9m sv\u011bt\u011b naopak plat\u00ed za ctnost!<\/p>\n

\u017d\u00e1dn\u00fd z\u00e1kon toti\u017e nezakazuje\u00a0\u201eve\u0159ejn\u011b rozhla\u0161ovat tvrzen\u00ed, kter\u00e1 odporuj\u00ed jednozna\u010dn\u00fdm historick\u00fdm zji\u0161t\u011bn\u00edm\u201c\u00a0<\/em>!!!<\/strong>\u00a0Svobodu projevu a\u00a0pr\u00e1vo vyhled\u00e1vat a\u00a0\u0161\u00ed\u0159it informace tedy v\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nelze omezit ani sv\u00e9voln\u00fdm v\u00fdkladem soudu, ani kdyby z\u00a0toho cht\u011bl ud\u011blat\u00a0v\u011brou\u010dn\u00e9 dogma, \u017ee\u00a0\u201eo jednozna\u010dn\u011b prok\u00e1zan\u00e9 historick\u00e9 pravd\u011b se nepolemizuje a nevyjedn\u00e1v\u00e1, ani kdy\u017e se \u201adiskut\u00e9\u0159i\u2018 zahaluj\u00ed vzne\u0161en\u00fdm pl\u00e1\u0161t\u011bm svobody slova\u201c!<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud po\u00a0urv\u00e1lkovsku op\u011bt podstr\u010dil obvin\u011bn\u00fdm svou interpretaci subjektivn\u00ed str\u00e1nky jejich trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti:\u00a0\u201eSt\u011b\u017eovatel\u00e9 ve zkouman\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b zcela v\u00a0duchu komunistick\u00e9 propagandistick\u00e9 doktr\u00edny pod\u0159\u00eddili pravdu ideologick\u00fdm \u00fa\u010del\u016fm, a\u00a0to s\u00a0c\u00edlem \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed sympati\u00ed k\u00a0b\u00fdval\u00e9mu Sov\u011btsk\u00e9mu svazu, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed dok\u00e1zan\u00fdch ud\u00e1lost\u00ed maskovali \u201av\u011bdeck\u00fdm n\u00e1zorem\u2018 a\u00a0ukr\u00fdv\u00e1n\u00edm se za \u00fadajnou absolutn\u00ed svobodou projevu.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

N\u00e1sledoval zcela inkvizi\u010dn\u00ed z\u00e1v\u011br:\u00a0\u201eDemokratick\u00fd pr\u00e1vn\u00ed st\u00e1t opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u011b trest\u00e1 z\u00e1m\u011brn\u00e9 fal\u0161ov\u00e1n\u00ed historie, vych\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00ed nav\u00edc z\u00a0n\u00edzk\u00fdch pohnutek, dot\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se cti ob\u011bt\u00ed a\u00a0citu poz\u016fstal\u00fdch. V\u00a0souladu s\u00a0pr\u00e1vem a\u00a0v\u00a0z\u00e1jmu minulosti, sou\u010dasnosti i\u00a0budoucnosti.\u201c<\/em>\u00a0 Zb\u00fdv\u00e1 jen se dot\u00e1zat \u2013 v\u00a0souladu s\u00a0jak\u00fdm pr\u00e1vem? V\u00a0jak\u00e9m z\u00e1jmu?<\/p>\n

KDE Z\u016eSTALA CIVILIZACE?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

P\u0159ede\u0161lu p\u011bkn\u00fd v\u00fdrok Terezy Mat\u011bj\u010dkov\u00e9 z\u00a0Echa24: Spole\u010dnost je tak siln\u00e1, kolik argumenta\u010dn\u00ed v\u00fdm\u011bny unese!<\/p>\n

V civilizovan\u00fdch zem\u00edch lze toti\u017e pochybovat i\u00a0o\u00a0\u201ejednozna\u010dn\u011b prok\u00e1zan\u00fdch pravd\u00e1ch\u201c. Katolick\u00e1 c\u00edrkev dokonce u\u017e ve st\u0159edov\u011bku k\u00a0odstran\u011bn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00fdch nedostatk\u016f kanoniza\u010dn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed z\u0159\u00eddila syst\u00e9movou oponenturu (advocatus diaboli). I\u00a0trestn\u00ed z\u00e1konod\u00e1rstv\u00ed zn\u00e1 mo\u017enost obnovy procesu, objev\u00ed-li se d\u016fvodn\u00e9 pochybnosti \u2013 t\u0159eba i\u00a0s\u00a0velk\u00fdm \u010dasov\u00fdm odstupem, jak je vidno u\u00a0mnoha p\u0159\u00edpad\u016f ve Spojen\u00fdch st\u00e1tech, kdy jsou t\u0159eba a\u017e po\u00a0mnoha desetilet\u00edch propu\u0161t\u011bni odsouzen\u00ed, v\u00a0jejich\u017e p\u0159\u00edpadech se zjistilo, \u017ee byli odsouzen\u00ed nespravedliv\u011b. Pochybnosti tu tedy hraj\u00ed podstatnou a\u00a0veskrze pozitivn\u00ed roli.<\/p>\n

Pochybnosti jsou dokonce podle filosofa Ladislava Hejd\u00e1nka sam\u00fdm z\u00e1kladem filosofie, na n\u00ed\u017e byla vybudov\u00e1na evropsk\u00e1 civilizace. Z\u0159\u00edkat se tedy pochybnost\u00ed je hloupost, a\u00a0zakazovat je ryze anticiviliza\u010dn\u00ed jev.<\/p>\n

Tuto idealismem prosycenou pas\u00e1\u017e nicm\u00e9n\u011b zakon\u010d\u00edm drsn\u011b realistick\u00fdm odkazem na velezku\u0161en\u00e9ho politick\u00e9ho v\u011bzn\u011b Milana Daniela, kter\u00fd s\u00a0oblibou cituje prokur\u00e1tora, kter\u00fd ho v\u00a0roce 1972 p\u0159evychov\u00e1val ve v\u011bznici na Borech: \u0158\u00edkal: \u201ePravda je dvoj\u00ed \u2013 kladn\u00e1 a\u00a0z\u00e1porn\u00e1. Tu z\u00e1pornou pravdu maj\u00ed na\u0161i nep\u0159\u00e1tel\u00e9. Kladn\u00e1 pravda je na\u0161e.\u201c \u2014 A\u00a0hned je jasn\u00e9, kde m\u00e1 \u00dastavn\u00ed soud my\u0161lenkov\u00e9 z\u0159\u00eddlo!<\/p>\n

NEM\u00cdSTN\u00c1 OBHAJOBA ZNEMO\u017dN\u011aNA<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Obvin\u011bn\u00e9mu Sk\u00e1lovi nebylo umo\u017en\u011bno kl\u00e1st ot\u00e1zky expert\u016fm, jejich\u017e posudky soud prov\u00e1d\u011bl, p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b na kter\u00e9 odkazoval. \u00dastavn\u00ed soud si v\u0161ak i\u00a0s\u00a0touto \u201ez\u00e1pornou pravdou\u201c st\u011b\u017eovatele v\u00ed rady, a\u00a0uv\u00e1d\u00ed \u201ekladnou pravdu\u201c, \u017ee toti\u017e\u00a0\u201eprojedn\u00e1n\u00ed ob\u017ealoby by poskytlo pachateli bez sebereflexe pouze dal\u0161\u00ed prostor k pokra\u010dov\u00e1n\u00ed v p\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti, a to nav\u00edc ve\u0159ejn\u011b za p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9 medi\u00e1ln\u00ed pozornosti, za p\u0159\u00edtomnosti a nucen\u00e9ho zapojen\u00ed stran a soudu do nem\u00edstn\u00fdch (potenci\u00e1ln\u011b trestn\u00fdch) diskus\u00ed nebo polemik.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

M\u016f\u017eeme cynicky dovodit, \u017ee moudr\u00e9 soudy tak vlastn\u011b zabr\u00e1nily obvin\u011bn\u00fdm v\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edm p\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti, a\u00a0\u017ee je tak vlastn\u011b ochr\u00e1nily od n\u00e1\u0161upu, proto\u017ee \u010d\u00edm v\u00edce by se obhajovali, t\u00edm hor\u0161\u00ed by to pro n\u011b v\u00a0z\u00e1v\u011bru bylo!<\/p>\n

PROTIMLUV<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud konstatuje, \u017ee roku 2010 rusk\u00e1\u00a0St\u00e1tn\u00ed duma schv\u00e1lila<\/strong>\u00a0rezoluci uzn\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed, \u017ee katy\u0148sk\u00fd masakr byl zlo\u010din proveden\u00fd na p\u0159\u00edm\u00fd rozkaz Stalina a\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edch vysok\u00fdch p\u0159edstavitel\u016f SSSR.<\/p>\n

Pokra\u010duje pak zcela schizofrenn\u011b, kdy\u017e p\u00ed\u0161e: \u201epokud se st\u011b\u017eovatel Sk\u00e1la dotazuje\u201a co se stane, kdy\u017e St\u00e1tn\u00ed duma zru\u0161\u00ed sv\u00e9 usnesen\u00ed z\u00a0roku 2010 a\u00a0prohl\u00e1s\u00ed, \u017ee do\u0161lo k\u00a0podvodu s\u00a0\u00a0c\u00edlem po\u0161kodit Ruskou federaci\u2018, mo\u017eno jen stru\u010dn\u011b uv\u00e9st, \u017ee\u00a0hlasov\u00e1n\u00edm \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9ho org\u00e1nu se nerozhoduje o\u00a0tom, co se stalo v\u00a0minulosti<\/strong>.\u201c<\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud se tak zm\u011bnil v\u00a0ne\u00fastavn\u00ed odsoud.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Jan Schneider<\/strong>
\nrp, prvnizpravy.cz<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Jan Schneider, disident, signat\u00e1\u0159 Charty77, pozd\u011bji vysok\u00fd d\u016fstojn\u00edk vznikaj\u00edc\u00ed BIS, upozor\u0148uje na urv\u00e1lkovsk\u00e9 totalit\u00e1rn\u00ed m\u00f3resy…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":60013,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[1009,553,48,335],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69598"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69598"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69598\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60013"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69598"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69598"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69598"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}