{"id":47067,"date":"2024-02-15T00:44:50","date_gmt":"2024-02-14T23:44:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=47067"},"modified":"2024-02-14T17:09:15","modified_gmt":"2024-02-14T16:09:15","slug":"zdenek-koudelka-pochybny-duchodovy-nalez-ustavniho-soudu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2024\/02\/15\/zdenek-koudelka-pochybny-duchodovy-nalez-ustavniho-soudu\/","title":{"rendered":"Zden\u011bk Koudelka: Pochybn\u00fd d\u016fchodov\u00fd n\u00e1lez \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soudce Vojt\u011bch \u0160im\u00ed\u010dek p\u0159i\u00a0obran\u011b n\u00e1lezu \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu ve v\u011bci z\u00e1kona sni\u017euj\u00edc\u00edho valorizaci d\u016fchod\u016f v\u00a0rozhovoru s\u00a0Petrem Kozelkou \u201e\u0160im\u00ed\u010dek: Vl\u00e1du jsme nechv\u00e1lili, pr\u00e1va senior\u016f prost\u011b neporu\u0161ila\u201c (Novinky.cz 27.\u00a01.\u00a02024)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Uvedl p\u0159\u00edklad:\u00a0\u201eJsem ro\u010dn\u00edk 1969, a\u00a0kdy\u017e jsem nastupoval poprv\u00e9 do pr\u00e1ce, tak platilo, \u017ee do d\u016fchodu mohu odej\u00edt v\u00a0n\u011bjak\u00e9m v\u011bku, co\u017e se mezit\u00edm n\u011bkolikr\u00e1t zm\u011bnilo a\u00a0mo\u017en\u00e1 je\u0161t\u011b zm\u011bn\u00ed. Pohybujeme se proto v\u00a0r\u00e1mci legitimn\u00edho o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed, nikoliv nep\u0159\u00edpustn\u00e9 retroaktivity.\u201c<\/em><\/a>. V\u00a0tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b m\u00e1 pravdu, proto\u017ee \u0160im\u00ed\u010dek dosud nesplnil podm\u00ednky pro vznik pr\u00e1va na starobn\u00ed d\u016fchod. Tomu u\u00a0valorizace d\u016fchod\u016f odpov\u00edd\u00e1 situace, kdy pro konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed valorizaci nen\u00ed spln\u011bna podm\u00ednka inflace a\u00a0z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce by se ji rozhodl zm\u011bnit.<\/p>\n

Zp\u011btn\u00e1 \u00fa\u010dinnost sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed valorizace v\u00a0roce 2023<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

V\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b valorizace v\u00a0roce 2023 v\u0161ak \u0161lo o\u00a0jinou situaci. Z\u00e1konn\u00e1 podm\u00ednka inflace pro valorizaci d\u016fchod\u016f byla napln\u011bna v\u00a0lednu 2023 a\u00a0t\u00edm vzniklo legitimn\u00ed o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed i\u00a0z\u00e1konn\u00e9 subjektivn\u00ed pr\u00e1vo na valorizaci d\u016fchod\u016f, by\u0165 je\u0161t\u011b nebyla splatn\u00e1. Pokud a\u017e po\u00a0vzniku subjektivn\u00edho, by\u0165 nesplatn\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va, z\u00e1kon zm\u011bnil toto pr\u00e1vo k\u00a0hor\u0161\u00edmu (sn\u00ed\u017eil valorizaci), jde o\u00a0nep\u0159\u00edpustnou pravou zp\u011btnou \u00fa\u010dinnost (retroaktivitu). To, \u017ee nebylo vyd\u00e1no prov\u00e1d\u011bc\u00ed vl\u00e1dn\u00ed na\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed a\u00a0nedo\u0161lo ke splatnosti valorizace, nen\u00ed rozhoduj\u00edc\u00ed. Na\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed vl\u00e1dy jako prov\u00e1d\u011bc\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00ed p\u0159edpis pr\u00e1vo na valorizaci nezakl\u00e1d\u00e1, ale jen ji\u017e u\u00a0pr\u00e1va vznikl\u00e9ho ze z\u00e1kona prov\u00e1d\u00ed podm\u00ednky jeho realizace.<\/p>\n

Majetkov\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo, by\u0165 p\u0159ed splatnost\u00ed, je \u00fastavn\u011b chr\u00e1n\u011bno. Jak by se \u00fastavn\u00ed soudci d\u00edvali na situaci, kdy by z\u00e1kon zru\u0161il pohled\u00e1vky v\u011b\u0159itel\u016f v\u016f\u010di st\u00e1tu, kter\u00e9 je\u0161t\u011b nejsou splatn\u00e9 s\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee nesplatn\u00e1 pohled\u00e1vka nepo\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 ochrany vlastnick\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va? Na\u0161t\u011bst\u00ed praxe pln\u011b pova\u017euje nesplatn\u00e9 pohled\u00e1vky za majetkov\u00e9 pr\u00e1vo v\u011b\u0159itele, kter\u00e9 je chr\u00e1n\u011bno. M\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt i\u00a0obchodov\u00e1no \u2013 p\u0159evod dlu\u017en\u00edch \u00fapis\u016f je\u0161t\u011b p\u0159ed jejich splatnost\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Uve\u010fme p\u0159\u00edpad u\u00a0\u00fastavn\u00edch soudc\u016f sam\u00fdch. Jejich plat stanov\u00ed z\u00e1kon, splatn\u00fd je v\u0161ak a\u017e 11.\u00a0n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edho m\u011bs\u00edce, kdy je v\u00fdplatn\u00ed term\u00edn. Kdyby z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce stanovil zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed plat\u016f \u00fastavn\u00edch soudc\u016f od 1.\u00a0ledna, ale pak by si to rozmyslel a\u00a0z\u00e1konem \u00fa\u010dinn\u00fdm 2.\u00a0\u00fanora by toto zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed platu sn\u00ed\u017eil a\u00a0to i\u00a0za leden s\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee lednov\u00fd plat je\u0161t\u011b nen\u00ed splatn\u00fd, byl by takov\u00fd z\u00e1kon \u00dastavn\u00edm soudem zru\u0161en. \u00dastavn\u00ed soudci by v\u016f\u010di n\u011bmu pou\u017eili argument legitimn\u00edho o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed, by\u0165 kr\u00e1tk\u00e9ho, i\u00a0argument, \u017ee pr\u00e1vo na lednov\u00fd plat jim vzniklo spln\u011bn\u00edm pracovn\u00ed doby 31.\u00a0ledna a\u00a0ji\u017e nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt v\u00a0neprosp\u011bch soudc\u016f sn\u00ed\u017eeno.<\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud se odch\u00fdlil od sv\u00e9 dosavadn\u00ed judikatury. V\u00a0minulosti zru\u0161il sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed podpory \u00a0pro stavebn\u00ed spo\u0159en\u00ed z\u00a0d\u016fvodu nedovolen\u00e9 retroaktivity n\u00e1lezem z\u00a019.\u00a04.\u00a02011, Pl.\u00daS 53\/10, kdy konstatoval, \u017ee ur\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed pro vznik pr\u00e1va, kter\u00e9 po\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 \u00fastavn\u00ed ochrany, je spln\u011bn\u00ed z\u00e1konn\u00fdch podm\u00ednek pro st\u00e1tn\u00ed podporu, nikoliv a\u017e jej\u00ed splatnost. Tehdy \u00dastavn\u00ed soud uvedl, \u017ee nen\u00ed rozhoduj\u00edc\u00ed, \u017ee v\u00a0dan\u00e9m okam\u017eiku dosud nedo\u0161lo k\u00a0pouk\u00e1z\u00e1n\u00ed \u010d\u00e1stky st\u00e1tem \u010di\u00a0k\u00a0jej\u00edmu vyplacen\u00ed stavebn\u00ed spo\u0159itelnou. S\u00a0t\u00edmto se nyn\u00ed \u00dastavn\u00ed soud nevypo\u0159\u00e1dal, p\u0159esto\u017ee na to pouk\u00e1zal soudce Jan Svato\u0148.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

V\u00a0roce 2000 z\u00e1kon stanovil, \u017ee se osoby, kter\u00e9 maj\u00ed pr\u00e1vo trval\u00e9ho u\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed ke st\u00e1tn\u00edm pozemk\u016fm, st\u00e1vaj\u00ed vlastn\u00edky t\u011bchto pozemk\u016f po\u00a0uplynut\u00ed jednoho roku od \u00fa\u010dinnosti z\u00e1kona. Je\u0161t\u011b p\u0159ed uplynut\u00edm t\u00e9to doby si to z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce rozmyslel a\u00a0tuto zm\u011bnu pr\u00e1va u\u017e\u00edvac\u00edho na vlastnick\u00e9 zru\u0161il. Proti tomu se postavil \u00dastavn\u00ed soud n\u00e1lezem z\u00a09.\u00a03.\u00a02004, Pl.\u00daS 2\/02. V\u00a0n\u011bm uvedl, \u017ee tato zm\u011bna poru\u0161ila princip pr\u00e1vn\u00ed jistoty a\u00a0d\u016fv\u011bry v\u00a0pr\u00e1vo s\u00a0t\u00edm, \u017ee z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce rezignoval na svou mor\u00e1ln\u00ed povinnost j\u00edt p\u0159\u00edkladem v\u00a0respektov\u00e1n\u00ed pr\u00e1va. Tehdy \u00dastavn\u00ed soud uvedl, \u017ee z\u00e1sah z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce vykazuje siln\u00e9 znaky sv\u00e9vole, dnes sv\u00e9voli vykazuje d\u016fchodov\u00fd n\u00e1lez \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu.<\/p>\n

Uvedeme-li \u0160im\u00ed\u010dk\u016fv p\u0159\u00edklad do spr\u00e1vn\u00e9 situace, tak tomu odpov\u00edd\u00e1, \u017ee kdy\u017e by \u0160im\u00ed\u010dek splnil podm\u00ednky na starobn\u00ed d\u016fchod, v\u010detn\u011b v\u011bku, ale nepo\u017e\u00e1dal o\u00a0n\u011bj a\u00a0tedy se ani d\u016fchod nestal splatn\u00fdm, a\u00a0nad\u00e1le jako soudce po\u017e\u00edval soudcovsk\u00fd plat a\u017e do 70 let. V\u00a0mezidob\u00ed by v\u0161ak z\u00e1kon zm\u011bnil d\u016fchodov\u00fd v\u011bk na 75 let i\u00a0t\u011bm, kte\u0159\u00ed ji\u017e p\u016fvodn\u00edho d\u016fchodov\u00e9ho v\u011bku dos\u00e1hli, ale jen se prvn\u00ed d\u016fchod nestal splatn\u00fdm. To by v\u016f\u010di t\u011bm, kte\u0159\u00ed ji\u017e z\u00edskali pr\u00e1vo na d\u016fchod, by\u0165 jej nepob\u00edrali, bylo retroaktivn\u00ed. Proto se d\u016fchodov\u00e9 novely u\u017eily na ty, kte\u0159\u00ed z\u00edskali pr\u00e1vo na d\u016fchod podle d\u0159\u00edv\u011bj\u0161\u00edho z\u00e1kona, jen kdy\u017e byly pro d\u016fchodce v\u00fdhodn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed, aby se retroaktivit\u011b zabr\u00e1nilo.<\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00edmu soudu nevad\u00ed nez\u00e1konn\u00fd v\u00fdkon z\u00e1konod\u00e1rn\u00e9 moci<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Vl\u00e1dn\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161ina p\u0159i\u00a0projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed z\u00e1kona poru\u0161ila z\u00e1kon o\u00a0jednac\u00edm \u0159\u00e1du Poslaneck\u00e9 sn\u011bmovny, kdy\u017e neumo\u017enila vystoupit v\u0161em do rozpravy p\u0159ihl\u00e1\u0161en\u00fdm opozi\u010dn\u00edm poslanc\u016fm. \u00dastavn\u00ed soud \u0159ekl, \u017ee to nepova\u017euje za z\u00e1sadn\u00ed, proto\u017ee toto poru\u0161en\u00ed nem\u011blo \u00fastavn\u00ed rozm\u011br. \u00dastavn\u00ed soud ignoroval \u00fastavn\u00ed z\u00e1sadu, \u017ee st\u00e1tn\u00ed moc lze uplat\u0148ovat jen v\u00a0mez\u00edch a\u00a0zp\u016fsoby, kter\u00e9 stanov\u00ed z\u00e1kon. \u00dastava \u0159adu v\u011bc\u00ed ne\u0159e\u0161\u00ed, \u0159e\u0161\u00ed je z\u00e1kon, v\u010detn\u011b v\u00fdkonu z\u00e1konod\u00e1rn\u00e9 moci st\u00e1tu. Je \u00fad\u011bsn\u00e9, \u017ee \u00dastavn\u00ed soud v\u00a0z\u00e1sad\u011b umo\u017enil st\u00e1tn\u00edm org\u00e1n\u016fm jednat nez\u00e1konn\u011b. Co\u017e a\u017e nez\u00e1konn\u00fd v\u00fdkon moci za\u010dne vyu\u017e\u00edvat ve sv\u00e9 \u010dinnosti policie \u010di\u00a0st\u00e1tn\u00ed zastupitelstv\u00ed? Anebo spr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ady s\u00a0odkazem na tento n\u00e1lez \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu \u0159eknou, \u017ee je nezaj\u00edmaj\u00ed ustanoven\u00ed spr\u00e1vn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du, kter\u00e1 nemaj\u00ed \u00fastavn\u00ed p\u0159esah \u010di\u00a0rozm\u011br.<\/p>\n

P\u0159itom je jednac\u00ed \u0159\u00e1d z\u00e1konem, kter\u00fd m\u00e1 moc sou\u010dasn\u00e1 vl\u00e1dn\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161ina zm\u011bnit. Vl\u00e1dn\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161ina m\u016f\u017ee bojovat proti obstrukc\u00edm \u0159\u00e1dnou zm\u011bnou jednac\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du, kdy by t\u0159ebas v\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u011b o\u00a0jednac\u00edm \u0159\u00e1du zavedla omezen\u00ed \u0159e\u010dnick\u00e9 lh\u016fty nebo rozsah hodin debaty pro jednotliv\u00e9 poslaneck\u00e9 kluby. Takov\u00e1 \u00faprava by byla v\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u011b a\u00a0jasn\u00e1. Platila by obecn\u011b, tedy i\u00a0tehdy, kdy\u017e se sou\u010dasn\u00ed vl\u00e1dn\u00ed dr\u017eitel\u00e9 moci octnou v\u00a0opozici. Ov\u0161em sn\u00ed\u017eila by se m\u00edra subjektivismu v\u00a0rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu, co\u017e m\u016f\u017ee n\u011bkter\u00fdm vadit. Nyn\u00ed z\u00e1kon situaci ne\u0159e\u0161\u00ed a\u00a0je na v\u016fli vl\u00e1dn\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161iny, kdy opozici utne. M\u016f\u017ee se spol\u00e9hat na nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed provl\u00e1dn\u00ed \u00dastavn\u00ed soud, \u017ee ji podr\u017e\u00ed. P\u0159itom i\u00a0d\u0159\u00edve \u00dastavn\u00ed soud ru\u0161il z\u00e1kony pro vady legislativn\u00edho procesu, jeho\u017e pr\u016fb\u011bh upravuje jen z\u00e1kon, ne p\u0159\u00edmo \u00dastava. Na jeho moment\u00e1ln\u00edm rozpolo\u017een\u00ed, z\u00e1le\u017e\u00ed, jak\u00e9 z\u00e1konn\u00e9 norm\u011b p\u0159izn\u00e1 i\u00a0\u201e\u00fastavn\u00ed rozm\u011br\u201c a\u00a0jak\u00e9 ne.<\/p>\n

Vl\u00e1da mohla v\u011bc \u0159e\u0161it \u0159\u00e1dn\u011b a\u00a0v\u010das<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Soudce Josef Fiala uvedl ve sv\u00e9m odli\u0161n\u00e9m stanovisku pravdu, kdy\u017e pouk\u00e1zal na to, \u017ee vl\u00e1da v\u011bc z\u00e1m\u011brn\u011b odkl\u00e1dala a\u017e po\u00a0prezidentsk\u00fdch volb\u00e1ch, aby zajistila v\u00edt\u011bzstv\u00ed Petra Pavla. Vl\u00e1da musela ji\u017e v\u00a0druh\u00e9 polovin\u011b roku 2022 v\u011bd\u011bt, \u017ee nastane mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u00e1 valorizace. Inflace zp\u016fsoben\u00e1 vl\u00e1dou obrovsk\u00fdm schodkem st\u00e1tn\u00edho rozpo\u010dtu i\u00a0r\u016fstem cen energi\u00ed vyvolan\u00fdm hloupou politikou zelen\u00e9ho \u00fad\u011blu byla p\u0159edv\u00eddateln\u00e1. Vl\u00e1da nemusela v\u011bd\u011bt, \u017ee p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00e1 m\u00edra inflace bude dosa\u017eena ji\u017e v\u00a0lednu 2023, ale jist\u011b by se tak stalo v\u00a0\u00fanoru \u010di\u00a0b\u0159eznu.<\/p>\n

Vl\u00e1da Petra Fialy byla p\u0159i\u00a0\u0159e\u0161en\u00ed re\u00e1ln\u00fdch probl\u00e9m\u016f ne\u010dinn\u00e1. Naopak se vy\u017e\u00edvala v\u00a0blbostech. P\u0159\u00edkladem je z\u00e1konn\u00e1 \u00faprava prosazen\u00e1 ministrem pr\u00e1ce a\u00a0soci\u00e1ln\u00edch v\u011bci, lidovcem Marianem Jure\u010dkou o\u00a0sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed d\u016fchodu mrtvol\u00e1m. Marian Jure\u010dka a\u00a0cel\u00e1 p\u011btikoali\u010dn\u00ed vl\u00e1da Petra Fialy prosadili zm\u011bnu z\u00e1kona o\u00a0d\u016fchodov\u00e9m poji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed vlo\u017een\u00edm nov\u00fdch ustanoven\u00ed z\u00e1konem \u010d.\u00a0455\/2022 Sb. tak, \u017ee se mimo jin\u00e9 sni\u017euje d\u016fchod p\u0159edsed\u016fm zemsk\u00fdch n\u00e1rodn\u00edch v\u00fdboru \u010di\u00a0p\u0159edsed\u016fm N\u00e1rodn\u00edho a\u00a0Feder\u00e1ln\u00edho shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed funkci zast\u00e1vali v\u00a0obdob\u00ed 25.\u00a02.\u00a01948 \u2013 17.\u00a011.\u00a01989. Zemsk\u00e9 n\u00e1rodn\u00ed v\u00fdbory byly dva \u2013 \u010cesk\u00fd a\u00a0Moravskoslezsk\u00fd a\u00a0oba byly zru\u0161eny 1.\u00a01.\u00a01949, tak\u017ee Jure\u010dkovi \u0161lo o\u00a0funkcion\u00e1\u0159e zast\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed tuto pozici mezi \u00fanorem a\u00a0prosincem 1948. P\u0159edsedou Moravskoslezsk\u00e9ho zemsk\u00e9ho n\u00e1rodn\u00edho v\u00fdboru byli Franti\u0161ek P\u00ed\u0161ek (1946-48) \u2013 zem\u0159el 1982 a\u00a0Karel Svitavsk\u00fd (1948) \u2013 zem\u0159el 1978. P\u0159edsedou \u010cesk\u00e9ho zemsk\u00e9ho n\u00e1rodn\u00edho v\u00fdboru byl Ladislav Kop\u0159iva (1945-48), kter\u00fd zem\u0159el 1971. P\u0159edsedov\u00e9 N\u00e1rodn\u00edho a\u00a0Feder\u00e1ln\u00edho shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed v\u00a0obdob\u00ed \u00fanor 1948 \u2013 listopad 1989 byli Old\u0159ich John (1948-53) \u2013 zem\u0159el 1961, Zden\u011bk Fierlinger (1953-64) \u2013 zem\u0159el 1976, Bohuslav La\u0161tovi\u010dka (1964-68) \u2013 zem\u0159el 1981, Josef Smrkovsk\u00fd (1968) \u2013 zem\u0159el 1974, Peter Colotka (1969) \u2013 zem\u0159el 2019, Alexander Dub\u010dek (1969) \u2013 zem\u0159el 1992, Dalibor Hanes (1969-71) \u2013 zem\u0159el 2007 a\u00a0Alois Indra (1971-89) \u2013 zem\u0159el 1990. M\u00edsto aby Jure\u010dka v\u010das \u0159e\u0161il valorizaci, sni\u017eoval d\u016fchod mrtvol\u00e1m, kter\u00e9 \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd d\u016fchod nemaj\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Zden\u011bk Koudelka<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00dastavn\u00ed soudce Vojt\u011bch \u0160im\u00ed\u010dek p\u0159i\u00a0obran\u011b n\u00e1lezu \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu ve v\u011bci z\u00e1kona sni\u017euj\u00edc\u00edho valorizaci d\u016fchod\u016f v\u00a0rozhovoru…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1627,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[998,29,335],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47067"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47067\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1627"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}