{"id":45978,"date":"2024-01-31T00:36:02","date_gmt":"2024-01-30T23:36:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=45978"},"modified":"2024-01-30T18:34:12","modified_gmt":"2024-01-30T17:34:12","slug":"podnet-k-podani-navrhu-na-zahajeni-karneho-rizeni-o-odpovednosti-soudce-vuci-judr-jane-bochnakove","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2024\/01\/31\/podnet-k-podani-navrhu-na-zahajeni-karneho-rizeni-o-odpovednosti-soudce-vuci-judr-jane-bochnakove\/","title":{"rendered":"Podn\u011bt k pod\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu na zah\u00e1jen\u00ed k\u00e1rn\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o odpov\u011bdnosti soudce v\u016f\u010di JUDr. Jan\u011b Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n
\n

Spolek \u0160alamoun podal v \u00fater\u00fd Podn\u011bt k pod\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu na zah\u00e1jen\u00ed k\u00e1rn\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o odpov\u011bdnosti soudce v\u016f\u010di JUDr. Jan\u011b Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9 z Okresn\u00edho soudu v Ostrav\u011b.
\n<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Motto: \u201eZ\u00e1sada ve\u0159ejnosti je z\u00e1kladn\u00ed z\u00e1sadou spravedliv\u00e9ho procesu a \u00fa\u010dast ve\u0159ejnosti lze omezit \u010di vylou\u010dit pouze v z\u00e1konem taxativn\u011b stanoven\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e k vylou\u010den\u00ed nebo omezen\u00ed \u00fa\u010dasti ve\u0159ejnosti by m\u011blo doch\u00e1zet ve v\u00fdjime\u010dn\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edpadech a po d\u016fkladn\u00e9m posouzen\u00ed konkr\u00e9tn\u00edch okolnost\u00ed ze strany soudu.\u201c<\/p>\n

V\u011bc:\u00a0Podn\u011bt k pod\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu na zah\u00e1jen\u00ed k\u00e1rn\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o odpov\u011bdnosti soudce<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

V\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pane p\u0159edsedo,
\ns odkazem na \u00a7 8, odst. 2, p\u00edsm. e, z\u00e1kona \u010d. 7\/2002 Sb., pod\u00e1v\u00e1me k Va\u0161im ruk\u00e1m podn\u011bt k pod\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu na zah\u00e1jen\u00ed k\u00e1rn\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o odpov\u011bdnosti soudce Okresn\u00edho soudu v Ostrav\u011b, JUDr. Jany Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Spolek \u0160alamoun je registrovan\u00fd spolek, kter\u00fd se ji\u017e t\u0159icet let zab\u00fdv\u00e1 nespravedliv\u011b st\u00edhan\u00fdmi, ob\u017ealovan\u00fdmi \u010di odsouzen\u00fdmi a v\u011bzn\u011bn\u00fdmi ob\u011btmi org\u00e1n\u016f \u010dinn\u00fdch v trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed (d\u00e1le tak\u00e9 \u201eO\u010cT\u0158\u201c). B\u011bhem t\u0159iceti let na\u0161\u00ed \u010dinnosti jsme dok\u00e1zali pomoci des\u00edtk\u00e1m ob\u011bt\u00ed zv\u016fle a nedbalosti O\u010cT\u0158. Tak jako V\u00fdbor na obranu nespravedliv\u011b st\u00edhan\u00fdch (VONS) v dob\u011b totality, tak i Spolek \u0160alamoun se dnes zab\u00fdv\u00e1 p\u0159\u00edpady, kdy do\u0161lo ze strany st\u00e1tu, prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm jeho org\u00e1n\u016f, k projev\u016fm zv\u016fle a poru\u0161ov\u00e1n\u00ed lidsk\u00fdch a ob\u010dansk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v, a tedy ke zneu\u017eit\u00ed \u00fa\u0159edn\u00ed moci (a pravomoci) a po\u0161kozen\u00ed pr\u00e1v jednotlivc\u016f.<\/p>\n

Spolek \u0160alamoun dlouhodob\u011b sleduje trestn\u00ed kauzu Jana Karase, projedn\u00e1vanou Okresn\u00edm soudem v Ostrav\u011b samosoudkyn\u00ed JUDr. Janou Boch\u0148\u00e1kovou.<\/p>\n

Dne 23. 1. 2024 se v budov\u011b Okresn\u00edho soudu v Ostrav\u011b v jednac\u00ed s\u00edni \u010d. 207 konalo dal\u0161\u00ed hlavn\u00ed l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed v trestn\u00ed v\u011bci pana Jana Karase. P\u0159ed vstupem do jednac\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b \u010d. 207 st\u00e1li\u00a0dva p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00edci justi\u010dn\u00ed str\u00e1\u017ee, kte\u0159\u00ed do jednac\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b odm\u00edtli vpustit nez\u00e1visl\u00e9ho novin\u00e1\u0159e Jana \u0160in\u00e1gla a z\u00e1stupce nez\u00e1visl\u00e9ho zpravodajstv\u00ed KTV Live Ivana Smetanu, kdy oba p\u0159\u00edpad pana Jana Karase dlouhodob\u011b sleduj\u00ed.<\/strong>\u00a0Argumentem p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00e9 justi\u010dn\u00ed str\u00e1\u017ee, s ohledem na nevpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed do jednac\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b bylo, \u017ee se maj\u00ed obr\u00e1tit p\u00edsemn\u011b na p\u0159edsedu soudu.<\/p>\n

Je nutno objektivn\u011b konstatovat, \u017ee ve\u0159ejnost nebyla vylou\u010dena dle \u00a7 200 Trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du. Nebylo \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fdm akceptovateln\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem rozhodnuto o p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9m postupu dle \u00a7 201 Tr\u0158, nato\u017e pe\u010dliv\u011b zd\u016fvodn\u011bno.<\/p>\n

Chceme z\u00e1sadn\u011b akcentovat, \u017ee z\u00e1sada ve\u0159ejnosti je jedn\u00edm z hlavn\u00edch princip\u016f soudn\u00edho procesu a je prom\u00edtnuta jak do \u00damluvy o ochran\u011b z\u00e1kladn\u00edch lidsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v a svobod (\u010dl. 6 odst. 1 \u00damluvy), tak do \u00dastavy \u010cR (\u010dl. 96 odst. 2 \u00dastavy) a Listiny z\u00e1kladn\u00edch pr\u00e1v a svobod (\u010dl. 38 odst. 2 Listiny). Z hlediska z\u00e1konn\u00fdch norem je pak z\u00e1sada ve\u0159ejnosti zakotvena p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm v \u00a7 116 a \u00a7 156 odst. 1 ob\u010dansk\u00e9ho soudn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du, v \u00a7 2 odst. 2 a \u00a7\u00a7 199 a\u017e 201 trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du, a v \u00a7 6 z\u00e1kona o soudech a soudc\u00edch.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Soudn\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed je tradi\u010dn\u011b postaveno na principu ve\u0159ejnosti, a \u00fastavod\u00e1rce v\u00fdznam tohoto principu zd\u016fraznil t\u00edm, \u017ee je zakotvil jak v \u010dl. 96 odst. 2 \u00dastavy, tak v \u010dl. 38 odst. 2 Listiny. Podle nauky princip ve\u0159ejnosti spo\u010d\u00edv\u00e1 v tom, \u017ee soudn\u00edmu projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed v\u011bci m\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt v z\u00e1sad\u011b kdokoliv p\u0159\u00edtomen, i osoba na dan\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpadu bezprost\u0159edn\u011b nezainteresovan\u00e1, a sleduje jednak prvek kontroly \u010dinnosti soud\u016f a jednak prvek prevence (Pavl\u00ed\u010dek, V., H\u0159ebejk, J.: \u00dastava a \u00fastavn\u00ed \u0159\u00e1d \u010desk\u00e9 republiky. Svazek I. \u00dastava \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky. Linde Praha: 1994. str. 233). Jinak \u0159e\u010deno ve\u0159ejnost jedn\u00e1n\u00ed m\u00e1 p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm umo\u017e\u0148ovat kontrolu \u0159\u00e1dn\u00e9ho v\u00fdkonu soudnictv\u00ed, posouzen\u00ed „jak ze strany st\u00e1tu kon\u00e1 se spravedlnost“, m\u00e1 zabra\u0148ovat „utajen\u00e9“ tzv. kabinetn\u00ed justici.<\/p>\n

Podle n\u011bkter\u00fdch n\u00e1zor\u016f je ve\u0159ejnost jedn\u00e1n\u00ed z\u00e1rove\u0148 z\u00e1rukou soudcovsk\u00e9 nez\u00e1vislosti, z\u0159ejm\u011b proto, \u017ee ve\u0159ejnost se m\u016f\u017ee p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010dit o tom, \u017ee soudce nejedn\u00e1 a nerozhoduje pod n\u011bjak\u00fdm viditeln\u00fdm dohledem \u010di n\u00e1tlakem (Sl\u00e1de\u010dek, V., Mikule, V, Sydlov\u00e1, J.: \u00dastava \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky. Koment\u00e1\u0159. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2007. str. 798. bod 12). Je\u0161t\u011b jinak \u0159e\u010deno jde o v\u0161eobecn\u00fd po\u017eadavek na transparentnost soudn\u00ed moci (Kl\u00edma, K. a kol.: Koment\u00e1\u0159 k \u00dastav\u011b a Listin\u011b. Plze\u0148: Vydavatelstv\u00ed a nakladatelstv\u00ed Ale\u0161 \u010cen\u011bk, 2005. str. 498).<\/p>\n

\u00dastavn\u00ed soud se rovn\u011b\u017e v n\u00e1lezu sp. zn. Pl. \u00daS 28\/04 (in N 205\/39 SbNU 171; 20\/2006 Sb.) p\u0159ihl\u00e1sil k tomu, \u017ee obecn\u00e9 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed v\u011bdom\u00ed tradi\u010dn\u011b vn\u00edm\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 projedn\u00e1n\u00ed v\u011bci jako n\u00e1stroj ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 kontroly justice. \u00da\u010delem ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho jedn\u00e1n\u00ed „jest, aby se ka\u017ed\u00fd p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010diti mohl o tom, jak ze strany st\u00e1tu kon\u00e1 se spravedlnost, kterou\u017eto kontrolou obecenstva nemo\u017enou se st\u00e1v\u00e1 v\u0161elik\u00e1 strannost soudc\u016f“ (srov. heslo „Ve\u0159ejn\u00fd“, in: Riegr\u016fv slovn\u00edk nau\u010dn\u00fd, IX, Praha 1872, str. 997).<\/p>\n

Dle vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed p\u0159edsedy Okresn\u00edho soudu v Ostrav\u011b, ze dne 19. 1. 2024 \u010d.j. 0 St 1\/2024 bylo sd\u011bleno, \u017ee d\u016fvodem nevpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed\u00a0Ivana Smetany<\/strong>\u00a0do jednac\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b hlavn\u00edho ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed je ta skute\u010dnost, \u017ee p\u0159ed zah\u00e1jen\u00edm hlavn\u00edho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed, dne 23. 8. 2023,\u00a0po\u0159\u00eddil fotografii samosoudkyn\u011b JUDr. Jany Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9 pro zpravodajsk\u00e9 \u00fa\u010dely.<\/strong>\u00a0Od t\u00e9to doby nen\u00ed ji\u017e Ivan Smetana vpou\u0161t\u011bn do jednac\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b s argumentac\u00ed samosoudkyn\u011b JUDr. Jany Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9, \u017ee dle \u00a7 201 Tr\u0158 by mohl ru\u0161it d\u016fstojn\u00fd d\u011bj hlavn\u00edho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed. Dle p\u0159edsedy soudu Mgr. Tom\u00e1\u0161e Kamr\u00e1dka takov\u00fd p\u0159\u00edstup pova\u017euje za p\u0159im\u011b\u0159en\u00fd.<\/p>\n

V t\u00e9to souvislosti nelze nezm\u00ednit N\u00e1lez II. \u00daS 2672\/07, kter\u00fd konstatuje:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201eLze uzav\u0159\u00edt, \u017ee p\u0159\u00edtomnost ve\u0159ejnosti, a\u0165 u\u017e osobn\u00ed \u010di skrze obrazov\u00fd \u010di zvukov\u00fd p\u0159enos nebo z\u00e1znam, nelze jednodu\u0161e \u010di automaticky odm\u00edtat \u010di vylu\u010dovat bez toho, \u017ee by k tomu byl relevantn\u00ed d\u016fvod, proto\u017ee jinak se jedn\u00e1 o sv\u00e9voli.\u201c<\/p>\n

Janu \u0160in\u00e1glovi d\u016fvod nevpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 hlavn\u00ed l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed sd\u011blen nebyl.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ani na jednu vte\u0159inu nelze p\u0159ipustit, \u017ee v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b Ivana Smetany z KTV Live je po\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed fotografie samosoudkyn\u011b JUDr. Jany Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9 d\u016fvodem do\u017eivotn\u00edho vylou\u010den\u00ed z jednac\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b, jako z\u00e1stupce ve\u0159ejnosti.\u00a0Takov\u00fd postup je naprost\u00fdm projevem libov\u016fle samosoudkyn\u011b JUDr. Jany Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9 a jej\u00ed nezp\u016fsobilosti k v\u00fdkonu funkce soudce. Pro oporu tohoto na\u0161eho z\u00e1v\u011bru je nutno konstatovat, \u017ee i Ministerstvo spravedlnosti \u010cR p\u0159ipravuje tzv. kartu soudce, v\u010detn\u011b fotografie, \u010di jak patrno z ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch zdroj\u016f www.usoud.cz, www.nsoud.cz,galerie soudc\u016f jsou b\u011b\u017en\u011b dostupn\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Ani v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nez\u00e1visl\u00e9ho novin\u00e1\u0159e Jana \u0160in\u00e1gla nelze p\u0159ipustit, \u017ee se samosoudkyni JUDr. Jan\u011b Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9 zjevn\u011b \u201enel\u00edb\u00ed\u201c, co\u017e nen\u00ed a nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt d\u016fvodem nevpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed, jako z\u00e1stupce ve\u0159ejnosti, na ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 hlavn\u00ed l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ani v jednom p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nebylo samosoudkyn\u00ed JUDr. Janou Boch\u0148\u00e1kovou vyu\u017eito m\u00edrn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch prost\u0159edk\u016f k udr\u017een\u00ed d\u016fstojnosti hlavn\u00edho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed (napomenut\u00ed, pokuta), ale pouze pomoc\u00ed justi\u010dn\u00ed str\u00e1\u017ee zamezila fyzick\u00e9mu vpu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed t\u011bchto osob do jednac\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b.<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1sadn\u011b broj\u00edme proti takov\u00e9to selekci z\u00e1stupc\u016f ve\u0159ejnosti.<\/p>\n

M\u00e1me za to, \u017ee d\u016fstojnost soudcovsk\u00e9 funkce se net\u00fdk\u00e1 jen toho kter\u00e9ho soudce, n\u00fdbr\u017e cel\u00e9 justice jako stavu. Pokud soudce tuto d\u016fstojnost naru\u0161uje, po\u0161kozuje t\u00edm nejen s\u00e1m sebe, ale i celou soudcovskou obec, nebo\u0165 justice mus\u00ed b\u00fdt v prv\u00e9 \u0159ad\u011b d\u016fv\u011bryhodn\u00e1. Je-li d\u016fv\u011bra v soudcovsk\u00fd stav ohro\u017eena, nelze o\u010dek\u00e1vat, \u017ee ve\u0159ejnost bude rozhodnut\u00ed soudc\u016f p\u0159ij\u00edmat a je akceptovat. Bez t\u00e9to d\u016fv\u011bry ale nelze napl\u0148ovat principy pr\u00e1vn\u00edho st\u00e1tu. Viz t\u00e9\u017e n\u00e1lez \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu sp. zn. I. \u00daS 2617\/15 z 5. 9. 2016.<\/p>\n

Bohu\u017eel se nejedn\u00e1 o ojedin\u011bl\u00fd exces samosoudkyn\u011b JUDr. Jany Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9. Jak vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 z na\u0161eho podn\u011btu na zah\u00e1jen\u00ed k\u00e1rn\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed ze dne 30. z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed 2019 ve v\u011bci 71 T 121\/2018 Ing. Marka G\u00e1by, v hlavn\u00edm l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed dne 19. 9. 2019, kdy sice nevylou\u010dila z\u00e1stupce ve\u0159ejnosti, ale pro \u201ejistotu\u201c zak\u00e1zala po\u0159izov\u00e1n\u00ed zvukov\u00e9ho z\u00e1znamu v\u0161em osob\u00e1m z \u0159ad ve\u0159ejnosti, co\u017e j\u00ed z\u00e1kon v\u016fbec neumo\u017e\u0148uje.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u00a0Jakou v\u00e1\u017enost a d\u016fv\u011bryhodnost justice a z\u00e1ruky fair procesu m\u016f\u017ee samosoudkyn\u011b JUDr. Jana Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e1 p\u0159edstavovat, kdy\u017e p\u0159ed zah\u00e1jen\u00edm hlavn\u00edho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed dne 23. 1. 2024 sed\u00ed v soudn\u00ed s\u00edn\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupce, kde\u017eto pr\u00e1vn\u00ed z\u00e1stupce \u201esprost\u00e9ho\u201cob\u017ealovan\u00e9ho vy\u010dk\u00e1v\u00e1 na chodb\u011b?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Ve sv\u011btle v\u0161ech t\u011bchto skute\u010dnost\u00ed, pova\u017eujeme n\u00e1\u0161 n\u00e1vrh na k\u00e1rn\u00e9 \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed proti samosoudkyni Okresn\u00edho soudu v Ostrav\u011b, JUDr. Jan\u011b Boch\u0148\u00e1kov\u00e9, za zcela d\u016fvodn\u00fd, proto\u017ee nen\u00ed u\u010debnicov\u011bj\u0161\u00ed p\u0159\u00edklad jak ohrozit nez\u00e1vislost a nestrannost justice, ne\u017e shora uveden\u00fd a zcela bezprecedentn\u00ed postup.\u00a0\u017d\u00e1d\u00e1me V\u00e1s, abyste za to navrhl JUDr. Janu Boch\u0148\u00e1kovou k\u00e1rn\u011b potrestat.<\/strong><\/p>\n

D\u011bkujeme, v \u00fact\u011b<\/p>\n

Spolek \u0160alamoun<\/em>
\nJohn Bok, \u010destn\u00fd p\u0159edseda<\/em><\/p>\n

za v\u00fdbor Spolku \u0160alamoun:
\n<\/strong>
\nV\u00e1clav Peri\u010devi\u010d
\nJUDr. PhDr. Miroslav \u0160padrna, Ph.D.
\nMgr. \u0160imon Mach<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Spolek \u0160alamoun podal v \u00fater\u00fd Podn\u011bt k pod\u00e1n\u00ed n\u00e1vrhu na zah\u00e1jen\u00ed k\u00e1rn\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed o odpov\u011bdnosti…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24220,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[33,324,3835,1178],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45978"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45978"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45979,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45978\/revisions\/45979"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24220"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}