{"id":43477,"date":"2023-12-29T03:39:43","date_gmt":"2023-12-29T02:39:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=43477"},"modified":"2023-12-29T03:39:43","modified_gmt":"2023-12-29T02:39:43","slug":"vit-skalsky-jak-nebyt-libtard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2023\/12\/29\/vit-skalsky-jak-nebyt-libtard\/","title":{"rendered":"V\u00edt Skalsk\u00fd: Jak neb\u00fdt libtard?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Nov\u00e9 slovo libtard se za\u010dalo vyskytovat v anglick\u00e9m jazykov\u00e9m prostoru kr\u00e1tce po roce 2000. Brzy bylo p\u0159ijato i v dal\u0161\u00edch jazykov\u00fdch oblastech.\u00a0Kombinuje slova liber\u00e1l a retard. Nen\u00ed p\u0159ekvapiv\u00e9, \u017ee liber\u00e1l (stoupenec liberalismu) je spojov\u00e1n s retardem (n\u011bk\u00fdm zpomalen\u00fdm) ?\u00a0<\/strong>V\u017edy\u0165 liberalismus je typicky pokrok\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e1 ideologie (pokrok je opakem zpomalen\u00ed). Ne, \u00fadiv nen\u00ed na m\u00edst\u011b.<\/p>\n

N\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed text nen\u00ed ur\u010den pro samotn\u00e9 libtardy. Ti maj\u00ed neot\u0159esitelnou v\u00edru v z\u00e1kladn\u00ed dogmata liberalismu. V jist\u00e9m ohledu se chovaj\u00ed d\u016fsledn\u011b. Logicky souvisle rozv\u00edjej\u00ed p\u0159edpoklady liberalistick\u00e9 ideologie. V n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm orienta\u010dn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku jde o ty, co kritizuj\u00ed libtardy. M\u00e1 n\u011bkdo legitimn\u00ed n\u00e1rok na to, aby kritizoval libtardy, kdy\u017e s\u00e1m v\u011b\u0159\u00ed liberalistick\u00fdm dogmat\u016fm? Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b nem\u00e1, nelze sed\u011bt na dvou \u017eidl\u00edch.\u00a0Lze b\u00fdt liber\u00e1l, nebo neb\u00fdt, ostatn\u00ed je \u0161patn\u011b. V\u0161echny ideje spolu souvis\u00ed. Kdo je ideov\u011b n\u011bkde na rozhran\u00ed, nem\u00e1 libtard\u016fm co vy\u010d\u00edtat.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Liberalismus vznikl jako reakce na novov\u011bk\u00fd absolutismus. Absolutismus sice potla\u010dil moc c\u00edrkv\u00ed, ale panovn\u00edk se st\u00e1le op\u00edral o legitimitu danou n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00fdm pojet\u00edm skute\u010dnosti. Liber\u00e1lov\u00e9 p\u0159inesli kompletn\u00ed antitezi. Vych\u00e1zej\u00ed z toho, \u017ee \u010dlov\u011bk je star\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e st\u00e1t a n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed. Vytvo\u0159ili proto teorii p\u0159edst\u00e1tn\u00edho p\u0159\u00edrodn\u00edho stavu \u010dlov\u011bka. V tomto stavu byl \u010dlov\u011bk sv\u00fdm vlastn\u00edm p\u00e1nem. M\u011bl neomezenou svobodu a bez p\u0159ek\u00e1\u017eek nakl\u00e1dal se sv\u00fdm vlastnictv\u00edm. Svobodn\u00ed lid\u00e9 takto zalo\u017eili svobodnou smlouvou (teorie smlouvy) st\u00e1t. V\u0161echny pravomoci st\u00e1tu takto poch\u00e1zej\u00ed z lidu. St\u00e1t je takto ve v\u0161em lidu odpov\u011bdn\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Nen\u00ed n\u00e1hodou, \u017ee komunisti maj\u00ed stejn\u00e9 p\u0159edpoklady (Rousseau) jako liber\u00e1lov\u00e9 (Locke). V\u017edy jde o \u010dlov\u011bka jako tabula rasa (\u010dist\u00e9ho, ni\u010d\u00edm nezat\u00ed\u017een\u00e9ho), kter\u00e9ho pozd\u011bji omezuj\u00ed instituce, p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm st\u00e1t a c\u00edrkev. Locka rozv\u00edj\u00ed Mill, Rousseaua samoz\u0159ejm\u011b Marx. Zat\u00edmco komunisti stanovuj\u00ed jako mechanismus pokroku ekonomick\u00e9 s\u00edly, liber\u00e1lov\u00e9 konsekventn\u011b pokrok\u00e1\u0159sky vs\u00e1z\u00ed na voln\u00fd pr\u016fb\u011bh v\u0161eho (laissez faire). St\u00e1t je t\u0159eba minimalizovat, nebo je\u0161t\u011b l\u00e9pe \u00fapln\u011b zru\u0161it. Voln\u00e1 sout\u011b\u017e p\u0159ivede lidstvo k blahobytu. Trh funguje v\u0161ude. I t\u0159eba v etice. Neetick\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed bude tr\u017en\u011b odm\u00edt\u00e1no, vyroste nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed mravnost. To sam\u00e9 v kultu\u0159e. Budeme m\u00edt jen ta nejlep\u0161\u00ed um\u011bleck\u00e1 d\u00edla a pod.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Jako opak liberalistick\u00fdch teori\u00ed lze zm\u00ednit realismus Aristotela. \u010clov\u011bk se nerod\u00ed jako nepopsan\u00fd list! \u010clov\u011bk je HOMO POLITICUS. A politika znamenala st\u00e1tnost (polis-m\u011bstsk\u00fd st\u00e1t). Spole\u010denskost \u010dlov\u011bka je takto zam\u011b\u0159ena ke st\u00e1tu. Teprve ve st\u00e1tu \u010dlov\u011bk dosahuje samostatnosti (autarkie). A st\u00e1t m\u00e1 nutn\u00e9 kontury. \u017den\u011b je ur\u010dena ve st\u00e1tu reprodukce (plozen\u00ed a v\u00fdchova d\u011bt\u00ed). Mu\u017e politicky vl\u00e1dne. M\u00e1 odpov\u011bdnost za bezpe\u010dnost a ekonomick\u00e9 zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed st\u00e1tu. Ka\u017ed\u00fd m\u00e1 r\u016fzn\u00e9 dispozice. N\u011bkdo vhodn\u00fd k obran\u011b st\u00e1tu, druh\u00fd zaji\u0161\u0165uje produkci. Nic v tomto ohledu nen\u00ed d\u00e1no libov\u016fli. V\u0161e je nav\u00edc v n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9m r\u00e1mci, proto\u017ee \u010dlov\u011bk je p\u0159irozen\u011b n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00fd (nem\u00e1 volbu nen\u00e1bo\u017eenskosti).<\/p>\n

Vra\u0165me se k libtard\u016fm. Libtard \u0159ekne, \u017ee pohlav\u00ed je voliteln\u00e9. Lze n\u011bco nam\u00edtnout, jestli\u017ee vych\u00e1z\u00edme z \u010dlov\u011bka, kter\u00fd je poj\u00edman\u00fd jako nepopsan\u00fd list? Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b nikoli. Jestli\u017ee nen\u00ed dan\u00e1 st\u00e1tnost \u010dlov\u011bka, pak ani pohlav\u00ed nem\u00e1 smysl. Jednalo by se o konstrukt. St\u00e1t je um\u011bl\u00fd \u00fatvar dan\u00fd svobodnou dohodou. Nen\u00ed pot\u0159ebn\u00e9, aby doch\u00e1zelo v r\u00e1mci st\u00e1tu k reprodukci. Nen\u00ed t\u0159eba, aby existovaly pohlavn\u00ed role. Uv\u011bdomuj\u00ed si kritici libtard\u016f, \u017ee jestli\u017ee m\u00e1 b\u00fdt jejich kritika smyslupln\u00e1, \u017ee mus\u00ed vych\u00e1zet z aristotelsk\u00e9ho realismu nebo jemu bl\u00edzk\u00fdch pozic?<\/strong><\/p>\n

Je to stejn\u00e9 v z\u00e1le\u017eitosti rodiny a n\u00e1roda. Pro\u010d rodina? Nechme v\u0161emu voln\u00fd pr\u016fb\u011bh. Rodina je svobodn\u00fd konstrukt stejn\u011b jako n\u00e1rod. Liber\u00e1l nezn\u00e1 \u010cechy, Rusy nebo N\u011bmce, zn\u00e1 jen lid sest\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed se ze svobodn\u00fdch jedinc\u016f<\/strong>. Libtard absolutn\u011b odm\u00edtne, \u017ee rodina byla p\u0159irozen\u00fdm a nutn\u00fdm stavebn\u00edm kamenem st\u00e1tu. Libtard souvisle s t\u00edm pop\u0159e, \u017ee by existovaly st\u00e1totvorn\u00e9 n\u00e1rody. Lze kritizovat libtardy a neb\u00fdt p\u0159itom stoupencem tradi\u010dn\u00ed rodiny a z\u00e1rove\u0148 nacionalismu? Jist\u011b\u017ee podobn\u00e1 kritika libtard\u016f je logicky nesouvisl\u00e1. P\u0159i kritice libtard\u016f si nelze z ideov\u00e9 bonboni\u00e9ry vyb\u00edrat jen ty kousky, kter\u00e9 nejv\u00edce chutnaj\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Podobn\u00e9 je to s n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00edm.\u00a0Pro\u010d n\u011bkdo kritizuje libtardy za podporu isl\u00e1msk\u00e9 imigrace, kdy\u017e si mysl\u00ed, \u017ee n\u00e1bo\u017eenskost nen\u00ed nutn\u00e1 danost \u010dlov\u011bka?\u00a0<\/strong>V\u017edy\u0165 si ka\u017ed\u00fd m\u016f\u017ee vybrat, jestli skute\u010dnost bude poj\u00edmat ideologicky (nen\u00e1bo\u017eensky) nebo prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm n\u011bkter\u00e9ho n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed. Nechme tomu voln\u00fd pr\u016fb\u011bh! Svobodn\u00fd trh n\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00fdch doktr\u00edn a ideologi\u00ed p\u0159ece nutn\u011b nalezne nejlep\u0161\u00ed \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed!<\/p>\n

V sou\u010dasn\u00e9 dob\u011b se liberalismus ideov\u011b spojil se sv\u00fdm komunistick\u00fdm bratrem. V\u00fdsledkem je libtard. Libtard d\u00edky tomu u\u017e prosazuje sv\u00e9 teze komunistickou repres\u00ed. Svobodu poslal na dlouhodobou dovolenou. Ale to nechme b\u00fdt. Snad je tento text dostate\u010dn\u00fd pro nejz\u00e1kladn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed orientaci p\u0159i kritice libtarda.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bc. V\u00edt Skalsk\u00fd<\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Nov\u00e9 slovo libtard se za\u010dalo vyskytovat v anglick\u00e9m jazykov\u00e9m prostoru kr\u00e1tce po roce 2000. Brzy…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":38641,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[29,6554,122],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43477"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43477"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43477\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38641"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43477"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43477"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43477"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}