{"id":35167,"date":"2023-08-31T01:06:57","date_gmt":"2023-08-30T23:06:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=35167"},"modified":"2023-08-30T15:36:39","modified_gmt":"2023-08-30T13:36:39","slug":"oslava-ockovani-ve-faktech-ne-ockovani-nezachranilo-miliony-zivotu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2023\/08\/31\/oslava-ockovani-ve-faktech-ne-ockovani-nezachranilo-miliony-zivotu\/","title":{"rendered":"Oslava o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed ve faktech: Ne, o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed nezachr\u00e1nilo miliony \u017eivot\u016f!"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

L\u017ei o milionech \u017eivot\u016f zachr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00fdch o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00edm proti koronaviru roz\u0161i\u0159uj\u00ed politici a mainstreamov\u00ed novin\u00e1\u0159i, kte\u0159\u00ed jsou jim loaj\u00e1ln\u00ed.\u00a0Pseudostudie, kter\u00e1 tuto poh\u00e1dku p\u0159ivedla na sv\u011bt, je zalo\u017eena na absurdn\u00edch chybn\u00fdch \u00fasudc\u00edch t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00edch se jak letality Covid-19, tak \u00fa\u010dinnosti experiment\u00e1ln\u00edch l\u00e9k\u016f na genovou terapii.\u00a0Iniciativa GGI rozeb\u00edr\u00e1 studii v r\u00e1mci ov\u011b\u0159en\u00ed fakt\u016f.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

O\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed hur\u00e1 do kontroly fakt\u016f \u2013 Ne, o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed nezachr\u00e1nilo miliony \u017eivot\u016f<\/span><\/h2>\n

Tiskov\u00e1 zpr\u00e1va<\/span><\/a> iniciativy GGI ze dne 29. srpna 2023<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Do poloviny roku 2022 studie zjist\u00ed, \u017ee vakc\u00edny Covid zachr\u00e1nily 15 a\u017e 20 milion\u016f \u017eivot\u016f.\u00a0Celkov\u011b m\u011bly vakc\u00edny v klinick\u00fdch studi\u00edch mal\u00fd nebo \u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd \u00fa\u010dinek na mortalitu.\u00a0Uveden\u00e1 modelov\u00e1 studie vytv\u00e1\u0159\u00ed neudr\u017eiteln\u00e9 p\u0159edpoklady.\u00a0Varianty z roku 2021 by se tedy staly v\u00fdrazn\u011b smrteln\u011bj\u0161\u00edmi;\u00a0P\u0159edpokl\u00e1dalo se, \u017ee imunita po infekci kles\u00e1, ale po o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed se p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dalo, \u017ee je trval\u00e1;\u00a0zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00e1 n\u00e1chylnost k onemocn\u011bn\u00ed kr\u00e1tce po o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed byla ignorov\u00e1na;\u00a0Vliv nefarmakologick\u00fdch opat\u0159en\u00ed nebyl zohledn\u011bn.\u00a0Po\u017eadujeme n\u00e1vrat k objektivit\u011b a kritick\u00e9mu zpravodajstv\u00ed.\u00a0Nev\u011brohodn\u00e9 v\u00fdsledky nesm\u00ed b\u00fdt nekriticky pou\u017e\u00edv\u00e1ny jako z\u00e1klad pro politick\u00e1 rozhodnut\u00ed.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Pozorov\u00e1n\u00ed a kontrafakty<\/span><\/h3>\n

V \u010dervnu 2022 byla zve\u0159ejn\u011bna studie, kter\u00e1 by podle zast\u00e1nc\u016f o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed ukon\u010dila jakoukoli dal\u0161\u00ed diskusi o v\u00fdhod\u00e1ch vakc\u00edn proti Covid.\u00a0V souladu s t\u00edm by o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed od 8. prosince 2020 do 8. prosince 2021 zachr\u00e1nilo 14 a\u017e 20 milion\u016f \u017eivot\u016f.\u00a0Toto \u010d\u00edslo bylo ur\u010deno pomoc\u00ed matematick\u00e9ho modelu.\u00a0[1]<\/span><\/p>\n

Principem t\u00e9to a podobn\u00fdch studi\u00ed je vypo\u010d\u00edtat rozd\u00edl mezi dv\u011bma sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159i.\u00a0Nejprve m\u00e1te skute\u010dn\u00e1 pozorov\u00e1n\u00ed;\u00a0Ty pou\u017eijete p\u0159\u00edmo nebo jim p\u0159izp\u016fsob\u00edte model (funkci \u010di k\u0159ivku).\u00a0Jak\u00e9koli probl\u00e9my s klasifikac\u00ed \u2013 nap\u0159.\u00a0B. ot\u00e1zka, zda jsi zem\u0159el na Coronu nebo s Coronou – krom\u011b toho je to ta snadn\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st.\u00a0Pak m\u00e1te kontrafaktu\u00e1ln\u00ed\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>,<\/span><\/em>\u00a0\u00a0kter\u00fd p\u0159edstavuje jak\u00fdsi alternativn\u00ed sv\u011bt.\u00a0<\/span>Jeho tvorba z\u00e1vis\u00ed mimo jin\u00e9 na p\u0159edpokladech, kter\u00e9 si model\u00e1\u0159i pro alternativn\u00ed sv\u011bt p\u0159edstavuj\u00ed.<\/span><\/strong>Jak se p\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1 smrt\u00edc\u00ed patogen, jak\u00fd \u00fa\u010dinek se o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1, \u017ee budou m\u00edt jak\u00e1koli dal\u0161\u00ed opat\u0159en\u00ed krom\u011b dan\u00e9ho z\u00e1sahu, jak\u00e9 sekund\u00e1rn\u00ed \u00fa\u010dinky jsou z\u00e1sahu p\u0159ipisov\u00e1ny (nap\u0159. sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed p\u0159enosu mezi o\u010dkovan\u00fdmi lidmi) atd. To v\u0161e ovliv\u0148uje kontrafaktu\u00e1ln\u00ed a tedy rozd\u00edl\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>mezi<\/span><\/em>\u00a0\u00a0pozorovan\u00fdmi a vypo\u010dten\u00fdmi daty.\u00a0M\u016f\u017eete \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee zde v alternativn\u00edm sv\u011bt\u011b existuje ur\u010dit\u00fd prostor.<\/span><\/p>\n

V\u011brohodnost z\u00e1sadn\u011b pochybn\u00e1<\/span><\/h3>\n

T\u00fdm veden\u00fd d\u00e1nskou zdravotnickou v\u011bdkyn\u00ed Christine Bennovou analyzoval v\u0161echny klinick\u00e9 studie vakc\u00edn proti Covid, pro kter\u00e9 existovala data a\u017e do ledna 2022.\u00a0V\u00fdsledkem je vyst\u0159\u00edzliv\u011bn\u00ed.\u00a0<\/span>Celkov\u011b vakc\u00edny zalo\u017een\u00e9 na mRNA v\u00fdznamn\u011b nesn\u00ed\u017eily Covid ani \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 \u00famrt\u00ed.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Vektorov\u00e9 vakc\u00edny (nap\u0159. proti ebole nebo hore\u010dce dengue, pro Corona od AstraZeneca nebo Johnson & Johnson) ob\u011b celkov\u011b v\u00fdznamn\u011b sn\u00ed\u017eily, ale VE (\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\u00fa\u010dinnost<\/span><\/a>\u00a0vakc\u00edny \u00a0) nen\u00ed ok\u00e1zal\u00e1, kolem 60 %.\u00a0[2]<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"\"<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Pomineme skute\u010dnost, \u017ee ani studie o vektorov\u00fdch vakc\u00edn\u00e1ch nejsou bezchybn\u00e9.\u00a0Za p\u0159edpokladu celkov\u00e9ho \u010dist\u00e9ho p\u0159\u00ednosu vyvst\u00e1v\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka, jak vysok\u00fd jej lze odhadnout.\u00a0Podle COVID-19 Data Explorer z Our World In Data (OWID) zem\u0159elo na COVID-19 na cel\u00e9m sv\u011bt\u011b mezi 5. lednem 2020 a 7. prosincem 2020 1,66 milionu lid\u00ed.\u00a0[3]\u00a0<\/span>Tyto registrace lze pova\u017eovat za nadhodnocen\u00e9, proto\u017ee v mnoha zem\u00edch posta\u010doval pozitivn\u00ed test v dob\u011b kolem \u00famrt\u00ed k tomu, aby se pova\u017eoval za \u00famrt\u00ed na covid.<\/span><\/strong>Nav\u00edc lze p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dat, \u017ee zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed imunity a zlep\u0161en\u00ed l\u00e9\u010dby by m\u011blo tendenci tento po\u010det v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edch letech sni\u017eovat.\u00a0Je tak\u00e9 ot\u00e1zkou, zda byl dostate\u010dn\u011b zohledn\u011bn obrovsk\u00fd v\u011bkov\u00fd gradient \u00famrtnosti na covid.\u00a0[4]<\/span><\/p>\n

Aby koronavirus dos\u00e1hl 14 nebo dokonce 20 milion\u016f zachr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00fdch \u017eivot\u016f, musel by nabrat t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 absurdn\u00ed obrat a prakticky p\u0159es noc by se stal nejm\u00e9n\u011b 8,5 a\u017e 12kr\u00e1t smrteln\u011bj\u0161\u00edm.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Sami v t\u00e9to kontrole reality \u2013 kter\u00e1 je velmi vst\u0159\u00edcn\u00e1, pokud jde o klasifikaci jako \u00famrt\u00ed na Covid \u2013 ji\u017e m\u016f\u017eete vid\u011bt, \u017ee prostor pro sv\u00e9voli zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fd v prvn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1sti byl zna\u010dn\u011b vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n.<\/span><\/p>\n

Z\u00e1v\u011brem bychom r\u00e1di upozornili na relativn\u011b kr\u00e1tkou dobu studia jednoho roku.\u00a0Co v tomto kontextu znamen\u00e1 zachr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00fd \u017eivot?\u00a0<\/span>V nejlep\u0161\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b lze studii interpretovat tak, \u017ee zejm\u00e9na star\u0161\u00ed a k\u0159ehc\u00ed lid\u00e9 by m\u011bli o n\u011bkolik t\u00fddn\u016f nebo m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f v\u00edce \u017eivota.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>To je zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b obt\u00ed\u017en\u00e9 na \u00farovni populace, proto\u017ee prodlou\u017een\u00ed d\u00e9lky \u017eivota nad pr\u016fm\u011brnou d\u00e9lku \u017eivota lze jen st\u011b\u017e\u00ed ur\u010dit.\u00a0Pr\u016fm\u011brn\u00fd v\u011bk \u00famrt\u00ed na Covid byl zn\u00e1m jako v\u00edce ne\u017e 82 let.\u00a0V\u00e1\u017en\u00e1 epidemiologick\u00e1 \u0161et\u0159en\u00ed v\u0161ak mus\u00ed br\u00e1t v \u00favahu i po\u010det let \u017eivota z\u00edskan\u00fdch za zachr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00fd \u017eivot.\u00a0[5]<\/span><\/p>\n

\u0160\u00edlen\u00e9 a neudr\u017eiteln\u00e9 domn\u011bnky<\/span><\/h3>\n

Nevyhnuteln\u011b vyvst\u00e1v\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka, jak\u00e9 neudr\u017eiteln\u00e9 p\u0159edpoklady u\u010dinili auto\u0159i studie Lancet, aby dosp\u011bli k tak katastrofick\u00e9mu paraleln\u00edmu sv\u011btu.\u00a0Touto ot\u00e1zkou se zab\u00fdvalo n\u011bkolik znal\u00fdch lid\u00ed.\u00a0Hlavn\u00ed chyby popisujeme v n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edch odstavc\u00edch.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00da\u010dinnost vakc\u00edn byla zna\u010dn\u011b p\u0159ece\u0148ov\u00e1na.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>\u00dadaje z klinick\u00fdch zkou\u0161ek vakc\u00edn a n\u00e1sledn\u00fdch observa\u010dn\u00edch studi\u00ed jsou p\u0159evzaty bez zohledn\u011bn\u00ed zkreslen\u00ed a systematick\u00fdch chyb;\u00a0Krom\u011b toho se p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dalo, \u017ee jejich \u00fa\u010dinek bude po dobu studie trvat neomezen\u011b.\u00a0To se uk\u00e1zalo jako zjevn\u011b nespr\u00e1vn\u00e9 dlouho p\u0159ed proveden\u00edm modelov\u00e1n\u00ed.\u00a0Ochrann\u00fd \u00fa\u010dinek ka\u017ed\u00e9 vakc\u00edny se \u010dasem sni\u017euje a proti Sars-Cov-2 kles\u00e1 je\u0161t\u011b rychleji ne\u017e u jin\u00fdch.\u00a0Tot\u00e9\u017e plat\u00ed pro \u00fa\u010dinek proti procesu p\u0159enosu;\u00a0P\u0159edpokl\u00e1dalo se, \u017ee je to 50 %, a\u010dkoli tato vysok\u00e1 \u00farove\u0148 ochrany proti p\u0159enosu nikdy neexistovala.\u00a0[6], [7]<\/span><\/p>\n

Na druhou stranu se p\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1, \u017ee p\u0159irozen\u00e1 imunita sl\u00e1bne.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>V podstat\u011b na z\u00e1klad\u011b chybn\u011b interpretovan\u00e9 studie byla uvedena m\u00edra imunitn\u00edho \u00faniku 27 %, tedy prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm mutac\u00ed m\u016f\u017ee patogen uniknout imunitn\u00ed reakci z infekce p\u0159edchoz\u00ed variantou.\u00a0V pr\u016fb\u011bhu anal\u00fdzy citlivosti byl specificky pro delta variantu p\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1n imunitn\u00ed \u00fanik 0 a\u017e 80 %.\u00a0[7] To jsou dv\u011b z\u00e1sadn\u00ed slabiny studie.\u00a0Imunitn\u00ed \u00fanikov\u00fd potenci\u00e1l varianty Delta byl v\u00fdznamn\u011b nadhodnocen a v\u011brohodn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed imunitn\u00ed \u00fanik proti vakcina\u010dn\u00edmu \u00fa\u010dinku byl ignorov\u00e1n;\u00a0pokud je p\u0159\u00edtomen, ovlivnil by pouze spike protein, kter\u00fd je zvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b n\u00e1chyln\u00fd k mutaci.<\/span><\/p>\n

Vynech\u00e1n\u00ed nebo klasifikace jako neo\u010dkovan\u00e9 u osob, jejich\u017e o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed bylo pouze p\u0159ed 1 \u2013 3 t\u00fddny, kter\u00e9 je jinak b\u011b\u017en\u00e9 prakticky ve v\u0161ech studi\u00edch \u2013 i kdy\u017e nevhodn\u00e9 \u2013 je zde zcela ignorov\u00e1no.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>V dob\u011b zve\u0159ejn\u011bn\u00ed bylo ji\u017e zn\u00e1mo, \u017ee riziko propuknut\u00ed onemocn\u011bn\u00ed je v tomto \u010dasov\u00e9m obdob\u00ed obzvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b vysok\u00e9.\u00a0Takov\u00e9 \u00fa\u010dinky byly ignorov\u00e1ny.\u00a0[6]<\/span><\/p>\n

P\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1 se, \u017ee \u00famrtnost na infekci u varianty Delta bude na za\u010d\u00e1tku krize v roce 2020 1 a\u017e 1,45kr\u00e1t vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e u varianty Wuhan.\u00a0To je p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 vysoko.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Naopak u varianty delta se o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1 sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed mortality.\u00a0[6]<\/span><\/p>\n

Vliv nefarmakologick\u00fdch opat\u0159en\u00ed (uzamyk\u00e1n\u00ed, masky atd.) je zcela ignorov\u00e1n.\u00a0Jejich \u0161kodliv\u00e9 \u00fa\u010dinky, stejn\u011b jako \u00fahyny a \u0161kody zp\u016fsoben\u00e9 samotn\u00fdm o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00edm jsou sporn\u00e9.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>Naopak, ve\u0161ker\u00e1 glob\u00e1ln\u00ed nad\u00famrtnost je p\u0159ipisov\u00e1na Covidu.\u00a0V\u0161echny tyto n\u011bkdy absurdn\u00ed domn\u011bnky jsou zodpov\u011bdn\u00e9 za skute\u010dnost, \u017ee o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed by \u00fadajn\u011b zabr\u00e1nilo 20 milion\u016fm dal\u0161\u00edch \u00famrt\u00ed nebo 63 % nadm\u011brn\u00e9 \u00famrtnosti z kontrafaktu\u00e1ln\u00edho\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>sv\u011bta<\/span><\/em>\u00a0\u00a0.\u00a0[6], [8]<\/span><\/p>\n

Z\u00e1v\u011br<\/span><\/h3>\n

Zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e1 studie o \u017eivot zachra\u0148uj\u00edc\u00edm o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed poch\u00e1z\u00ed ze stejn\u00e9ho prost\u0159ed\u00ed jako ta, kter\u00e1 na za\u010d\u00e1tku roku 2020 dramaticky nadhodnotila m\u00edru \u00famrtnosti na Covid pomoc\u00ed pochybn\u00fdch model\u016f.\u00a0<\/span><\/strong>[7] N\u00e1padn\u00e9 je tak\u00e9 to, \u017ee (d\u0159\u00edve) v\u011bdeck\u00fd \u010dasopis The Lancet od roku 2020 pravideln\u011b publikuje odv\u00e1\u017en\u00e9 \u010dl\u00e1nky, kter\u00e9 ji\u017e nemaj\u00ed se seri\u00f3zn\u00ed v\u011bdou nic spole\u010dn\u00e9ho.\u00a0L\u00e9ka\u0159 a odborn\u00edk na zdrav\u00ed David Bell v \u010dl\u00e1nku rozeb\u00edr\u00e1 nejnov\u011bj\u0161\u00ed propagandistick\u00e9 excesy v tomto \u010dasopise.\u00a0[8.]<\/span><\/p>\n

V tomto bod\u011b vyz\u00fdv\u00e1me m\u00e9dia, aby se vr\u00e1tila k objektivit\u011b a kritick\u00e9mu hodnocen\u00ed.\u00a0Takov\u00e9 \u0161\u00edlen\u00e9 v\u00fdsledky modelov\u00e1n\u00ed by nem\u011bly b\u00fdt p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1ny bez reflexe, ale m\u011bly by b\u00fdt prov\u011b\u0159eny z hlediska v\u011brohodnosti.\u00a0Konkr\u00e9tn\u011b tato neproch\u00e1z\u00ed takov\u00fdmi testy ani povrchn\u011b.\u00a0Kvalitn\u00ed m\u00e9dia se nesm\u00ed st\u00e1t hl\u00e1snou troubou pochybn\u00e9 v\u011bdy, jej\u00edm\u017e c\u00edlem je p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm d\u00e1t z\u00e1jm\u016fm sv\u00fdch sponzor\u016f zd\u00e1n\u00ed odborn\u00e9 legitimity.<\/span><\/p>\n

Prameny<\/span><\/h4>\n

[1] Watson O a kol.\u00a0<\/span>Glob\u00e1ln\u00ed dopad prvn\u00edho roku o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed proti COVID-19: studie matematick\u00e9ho modelov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/span><\/em>\u00a0.\u00a0The Lancet, Vol 22(9), str. 1293-1302, 2022. DOI:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S1473-3099(22)00320-6<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[2] Benn C a kol.\u00a0<\/span>Randomizovan\u00e9 klinick\u00e9 zkou\u0161ky vakc\u00edn proti COVID-19: Maj\u00ed vakc\u00edny proti adenovirov\u00e9mu vektoru p\u0159\u00edzniv\u00e9 nespecifick\u00e9 \u00fa\u010dinky?\u00a0<\/span><\/em>\u00a0SSRN, 2022. online:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4072489<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[3] Rosner M & al.\u00a0<\/span>Pr\u016fzkumn\u00edk dat COVID-19<\/span><\/em>\u00a0.\u00a0N\u00e1\u0161 sv\u011bt v datech, 2023. online:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/ourworldindata.org\/explorers\/coronavirus-data-explorer<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[4] Koops R.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>Zachr\u00e1nily vakc\u00edny proti Covidu des\u00edtky milion\u016f \u017eivot\u016f?\u00a0<\/span><\/em>\u00a0Brownstone Institute, 2022. online:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/brownstone.org\/articles\/did-covid-vaccines-save-tens-of-millions-of-lives<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[5] Horst M.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>Pohled zdrav\u00e9ho rozumu na 20 milion\u016f zachr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00fdch \u017eivot\u016f<\/span><\/em>\u00a0.\u00a0Brownstone Institute, 2022. online:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/brownstone.org\/articles\/a-common-sense-look-at-20-million-saved-lives<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[6] Pantazatos S, Seligmann H.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>Koment\u00e1\u0159 k t\u00e9matu \u201eGlob\u00e1ln\u00ed dopad prvn\u00edho roku o\u010dkov\u00e1n\u00ed proti COVID-19: studie matematick\u00e9ho modelov\u00e1n\u00ed.\u00a0The Lancet Infection Diseases.\u00a02022, 23. \u010dervna\u201c<\/span><\/em>\u00a0.\u00a0ResearchGate, 2022. online:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.13140\/RG.2.2.24813.26082<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[7] Raman B.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>Dal\u0161\u00ed chyby v o\u010dkovac\u00edm modelu s n\u00e1rokem na 20 milion\u016f zachr\u00e1n\u011bn\u00fdch \u017eivot\u016f<\/span><\/em>\u00a0.\u00a0Brownstone Institute, 2022. online:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/brownstone.org\/articles\/more-flaws-in-the-vaccine-model-claiming-20-million-lives-saved<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

[8] Bell D.\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>How To Model Fallacy, podle Lancet<\/span><\/em>\u00a0.\u00a0Brownstone Institute, 2022. online:\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>https:\/\/brownstone.org\/articles\/how-to-model-fallacy-according-to-the-lancet<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\"\"<\/a><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n