{"id":27399,"date":"2023-05-04T05:41:57","date_gmt":"2023-05-04T03:41:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=27399"},"modified":"2023-05-04T05:41:57","modified_gmt":"2023-05-04T03:41:57","slug":"zdenek-jemelik-zideologizovany-odflinknuty-proces","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2023\/05\/04\/zdenek-jemelik-zideologizovany-odflinknuty-proces\/","title":{"rendered":"Zden\u011bk Jemel\u00edk: Zideologizovan\u00fd odflinknut\u00fd proces"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Je hr\u016fzn\u00e9, kdy\u017e ideologizace pronikne do trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed. D\u011bje se to hlavn\u011b v\u00a0\u0159\u00edzen\u00edch, v\u00a0nich\u017e org\u00e1ny \u010dinn\u00e9 v\u00a0trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed up\u00edraj\u00ed obvin\u011bn\u00fdm n\u00e1rok na n\u00e1zor a\u00a0svobodu projevu. K\u00a0jednomu takov\u00e9mu procesu m\u011b za \u00fa\u010delem z\u00edsk\u00e1n\u00ed podpory pro odsouzen\u00e9ho p\u0159ivedli p\u0159\u00e1tel\u00e9 historika \u00a0Josefa Sk\u00e1ly, zn\u00e1m\u00e9ho p\u0159edstavitele KS\u010cM, odsouzen\u00e9ho spolu s\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edmi dv\u011bma \u201eh\u0159\u00ed\u0161n\u00edky\u201c dne 3.\u00a0b\u0159ezna 2023 samosoudcem Obvodn\u00edho soudu pro Prahu 7 Tom\u00e1\u0161em H\u00fcbnerem.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Nep\u0159\u00edjemn\u00fdm kritick\u00fdm znakem na\u0161\u00ed doby je ideologizace mezilidsk\u00fdch vztah\u016f<\/strong>, zp\u016fsobuj\u00edc\u00ed rozb\u00edjen\u00ed mnohalet\u00fdch p\u0159\u00e1telstv\u00ed \u010di\u00a0ru\u0161en\u00ed partnersk\u00e9 spolupr\u00e1ce. Bylo nebezpe\u010dn\u00e9 podporovat kandidaturu Andreje Babi\u0161e na prezidenta: jeho odp\u016frci se najednou k\u00a0p\u0159\u00e1tel\u016fm obraceli z\u00e1dy, na novin\u00e1\u0159e dopadala cenzura. Stoupenci a\u00a0odp\u016frci \u010dlenstv\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9\u00a0 republiky v\u00a0EU a\u00a0NATO si u\u00a0piva nesednou ke spole\u010dn\u00e9m stolu. Je\u0161t\u011b \u00fa\u010dinn\u011bj\u0161\u00edm katalyz\u00e1torem rozpadu tradi\u010dn\u00edch vztah\u016f je postoj k\u00a0rusk\u00e9 agresi proti Ukrajin\u011b.<\/p>\n

Je hr\u016fzn\u00e9, kdy\u017e ideologizace pronikne do trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed.<\/strong> D\u011bje se to hlavn\u011b v\u00a0\u0159\u00edzen\u00edch, v\u00a0nich\u017e org\u00e1ny \u010dinn\u00e9 v\u00a0trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed up\u00edraj\u00ed obvin\u011bn\u00fdm n\u00e1rok na n\u00e1zor a\u00a0svobodu projevu. K\u00a0jednomu takov\u00e9mu procesu m\u011b za \u00fa\u010delem z\u00edsk\u00e1n\u00ed podpory pro odsouzen\u00e9ho p\u0159ivedli p\u0159\u00e1tel\u00e9 historika \u00a0Josefa Sk\u00e1ly, zn\u00e1m\u00e9ho p\u0159edstavitele KS\u010cM, odsouzen\u00e9ho spolu s\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edmi dv\u011bma \u201eh\u0159\u00ed\u0161n\u00edky\u201c dne 3.\u00a0b\u0159ezna 2023 samosoudcem Obvodn\u00edho soudu pro Prahu 7 Tom\u00e1\u0161em H\u00fcbnerem k\u00a0podm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9mu trestu pro p\u0159e\u010din pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed, zpochyb\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed, schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0ospravedl\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed genocidia podle \u00a7 405 tr. z\u00e1kon\u00edku. Sou\u010dasn\u011b s\u00a0nimi byla odsouzena pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9 osoba Spolek Svobodn\u00e9 r\u00e1dio.<\/p>\n

Okolnost, \u017ee se p\u0159\u00e1tel\u00e9 Josefa Sk\u00e1ly obr\u00e1tili o\u00a0podporu pr\u00e1v\u011b na mne, je pon\u011bkud pikantn\u00ed.<\/strong> Nebyl jsem nikdy \u010dlenem KS\u010c, ani KS\u010cM, obsazen\u00ed \u010ceskoslovenska 21.\u00a0srpna 1968 a\u00a0n\u00e1slednou okupaci pova\u017euji za zlo\u010din\u00a0 a\u00a0odsuzuji ruskou agresi v\u016f\u010di Ukrajin\u011b. S\u00a0panem odsouzen\u00fdm k\u00a0sob\u011b m\u00e1me z\u0159ejm\u011b n\u00e1zorov\u011b hodn\u011b daleko. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b m\u00e1m ur\u010dit\u00fd respekt k\u00a0lidem, kte\u0159\u00ed se dr\u017e\u00ed sv\u00e9 v\u00edry, i\u00a0kdy\u017e to u\u017e krom\u011b nep\u0159\u00edjemnost\u00ed nic nenese. Jsou pro mne p\u0159ijateln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e ti, kte\u0159\u00ed zahodili rud\u00e9 kn\u00ed\u017eky a\u00a0\u201ep\u0159ekab\u00e1tili\u201c se v\u00a0nad\u0161en\u00e9\u00a0demokraty: sebranka, kter\u00e1 n\u00e1m vl\u00e1dla do listopadu 1989, vl\u00e1dne d\u00e1l. Zejm\u00e9na ale i\u00a0vrah m\u00e1 pr\u00e1vo na spravedliv\u00fd proces, a\u00a0to bez ohledu na jeho spole\u010densk\u00e9 postaven\u00ed a\u00a0politick\u00e9 n\u00e1zory. Krom\u011b toho ka\u017ed\u00e9 trestn\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed tohoto druhu je problematick\u00e9, proto\u017ee se snadno m\u016f\u017ee zvrhnout v\u00a0pop\u0159en\u00ed \u00fastavn\u00edho pr\u00e1va na svobodu n\u00e1zoru a\u00a0projevu. Proto jsem se s\u00a0pr\u016fb\u011bhem a\u00a0v\u00fdsledkem procesu sezn\u00e1mil a\u00a0zhrozil jsem se.<\/p>\n

Ob\u017ealovan\u00ed se m\u011bli provinit t\u00edm, \u017ee vedli ve\u0159ejnou diskusi o\u00a0tzv.\u00a0Katy\u0148sk\u00e9m masakru,<\/strong> obhajuj\u00edce n\u00e1zor, \u017ee jej nesp\u00e1chaly \u00fatvary sov\u011btsk\u00e9 tajn\u00e9 policie NKVD, ale n\u011bmeck\u00e1 vojska. Masakr v\u00a0Katy\u0148sk\u00e9m lese, tedy povra\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed tis\u00edc\u016f polsk\u00fdch d\u016fstojn\u00edk\u016f a\u00a0jejich pochov\u00e1n\u00ed v\u00a0hromadn\u00fdch hrobech, je hr\u016fzn\u00fd zlo\u010din, j\u00edm\u017e polsk\u00fd n\u00e1rod p\u0159i\u0161el o\u00a0\u010d\u00e1st sv\u00fdch elit. Pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed jeho uskute\u010dn\u011bn\u00ed by proto bylo trestuhodn\u00e9. Toho se ale ob\u017ealovan\u00ed nedopustili. \u0158e\u010d \u0161la pouze o\u00a0tom, kdo byl pachatelem, resp. obvin\u011bn\u00ed zpochyb\u0148ovali odpov\u011bdnost NKVD. Nad jejich argumentac\u00ed se nezam\u00fd\u0161l\u00edm, neb nejsem historik a\u00a0pro mne osobn\u011b \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed ot\u00e1zky nem\u00e1 v\u00fdznam. Podot\u00fdk\u00e1m, \u017ee kritick\u00e9 zkoum\u00e1n\u00ed ust\u00e1len\u00fdch p\u0159edstav pat\u0159\u00ed k\u00a0hybn\u00fdm motor\u016fm\u00a0 pokroku, tak\u017ee by m\u011blo m\u00edt zaru\u010denu beztrestnost.<\/p>\n

Nezn\u00e1m se osobn\u011b s\u00a0panem Josefem Sk\u00e1lou ani se spoluobvin\u011bn\u00fdmi,<\/strong> zato dlouh\u00e1 l\u00e9ta s\u00a0dv\u011bma ze t\u0159\u00ed obh\u00e1jc\u016f, k\u00a0jejich\u017e pr\u00e1vnick\u00e9mu \u00fasudku jako laik chov\u00e1m \u00factu. Shoduji se proto s\u00a0nimi v\u00a0n\u00e1zoru, \u017ee popsan\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed odsouzen\u00fdch neodpov\u00edd\u00e1 vymezen\u00ed dan\u00e9ho p\u0159e\u010dinu v\u00a0trestn\u00edm z\u00e1kon\u00edku. Pr\u00e1vem proto navrhli zpro\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch a\u00a0odsouzen\u00ed se pr\u00e1vem odvolali.<\/p>\n

Pou\u017eiji analogii:<\/strong> p\u0159i\u00a0vy\u0161et\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed vra\u017edy se \u010dasto pracuje s\u00a0v\u00edce verzemi. Kriminalist\u00e9 t\u00edm nepop\u00edraj\u00ed, \u017ee do\u0161lo k\u00a0vra\u017ed\u011b, ale hledaj\u00ed pachatele mezi v\u00edce mo\u017en\u00fdmi podez\u0159el\u00fdmi.<\/p>\n

Jako laik se v\u016fbec div\u00edm, pro\u010d s\u00a0touto l\u00e1tkou st\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupkyn\u011b obt\u011b\u017eovala soud.<\/strong> Mysl\u00edm si, \u017ee t\u00e9ma je pro naprostou v\u011bt\u0161inu ve\u0159ejnosti nezaj\u00edmav\u00e9. Ud\u00e1lost je sice hrozn\u00e1, ale pat\u0159\u00ed do minulosti a\u00a0nen\u00ed sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed na\u0161ich n\u00e1rodn\u00edch d\u011bjin. Z\u00a0vykonavatel\u016f mo\u017en\u00e1 n\u011bkde \u017eije p\u00e1r jedinc\u016f, pokud v\u016fbec n\u011bkdo. Oba st\u00e1ty, je\u017e by m\u011bly n\u00e9st odpov\u011bdnost, v\u00a0p\u016fvodn\u00ed podob\u011b zanikly. Nev\u00edm, jak\u00e9 d\u016fsledky dnes m\u016f\u017ee m\u00edt p\u0159izn\u00e1n\u00ed viny jedn\u00e9 nebo druh\u00e9 stran\u011b.\u00a0 Souzen\u00e1 debata a\u00a0jej\u00ed vyzn\u011bn\u00ed ve prosp\u011bch NKVD mi proto\u00a0 nep\u0159ipad\u00e1 spole\u010densky nebezpe\u010dn\u00e1. Odsouzen\u00ed m\u00e1 \u00fa\u010dinek pop\u0159en\u00ed pr\u00e1va ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch na n\u00e1zor a\u00a0na svobodu projevu. V\u00a0tomto p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b jde dle m\u00e9ho laick\u00e9ho \u00fasudku o\u00a0exces.<\/p>\n

Kdy\u017e u\u017e ale st\u00e1tn\u00ed zastupitelstv\u00ed trestn\u00ed st\u00edh\u00e1n\u00ed nezastavilo a\u00a0soud ob\u017ealobu p\u0159ijal, samosoudce si m\u011bl d\u00e1t pozor<\/strong>, aby snaha odsoudit ob\u017ealovan\u00e9 st\u016fj co\u00a0 st\u016fj ne\u010douhala z\u00a0jeho postupu \u201ejako sl\u00e1ma z\u00a0bot\u201c. Ponech\u00e1m stranou radik\u00e1ln\u00ed zam\u00edtnut\u00ed v\u0161ech n\u00e1vrh\u016f na dopln\u011bn\u00ed dokazov\u00e1n\u00ed ke konci druh\u00e9ho jednac\u00edho dne, nebo\u0165 soudce m\u011bl beztak jasno a\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed d\u016fkazy na nic\u00a0 nepot\u0159eboval.<\/p>\n

Zaujalo m\u011b ale, \u017ee samosoudce se ujal vyhl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed rozsudku po\u00a014minutov\u00e9 p\u0159est\u00e1vce.<\/strong> Na jeho p\u0159ednesen\u00ed a\u00a0n\u00e1sledn\u00e9 vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed odsouzen\u00fdch spot\u0159eboval 24 min. Rozsudek je argumenta\u010dn\u011b hodn\u011b bohat\u00fd. I\u00a0kdy\u017e jej p\u0159ednesl ve zkr\u00e1cen\u00e9 podob\u011b (p\u00edsemn\u00e9 vyhotoven\u00ed m\u00e1 16 stran), nezd\u00e1 se b\u00fdt mo\u017en\u00e9, \u017ee by jej sta\u010dil p\u0159ipravit za 14 minut. P\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1m, \u017ee jej m\u011bl p\u0159ipraven\u00fd p\u0159edem, tak\u017ee druh\u00fd jednac\u00ed den slou\u017eil pouze k\u00a0vytvo\u0159en\u00ed form\u00e1ln\u00edho zd\u00e1n\u00ed o\u00a0spravedliv\u00e9m procesu.<\/p>\n

\u010casto se ve\u0159ejnost do\u017eaduje urychlen\u00ed soudn\u00edch proces\u016f.<\/strong> K\u00a0tomu moud\u0159\u00ed lid\u00e9 ale dod\u00e1vaj\u00ed, \u017ee rychlost je sice d\u016fle\u017eit\u00e1, ale kvalita rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed je d\u016fle\u017eit\u011bj\u0161\u00ed a\u00a0rychlost by nem\u011bla j\u00edt na jej\u00ed \u00fakor. Kdyby samosoudce ukon\u010dil jedn\u00e1n\u00ed ve 14:43 hod. a\u00a0odro\u010dil vyhl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed rozsudku na dal\u0161\u00ed den, k\u0159e\u010dovit\u00e1 rychlost jeho postupu by u\u0161la pozornosti. Z\u016fstalo by jen p\u0159i\u00a0pochybnostech o\u00a0d\u016fvodnosti pop\u0159en\u00ed \u00fastavn\u00edch pr\u00e1v odsouzen\u00fdch.\u00a0Se zlomyslnost\u00ed sob\u011b vlastn\u00ed p\u0159eji samosoudci a\u00a0\u017ealobkyni, aby \u00a0odvolac\u00ed soud rozsudek zpochybnil.<\/p>\n

Zden\u011bk Jemel\u00edk<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

_____________________________<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Je hr\u016fzn\u00e9, kdy\u017e ideologizace pronikne do trestn\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed. D\u011bje se to hlavn\u011b v\u00a0\u0159\u00edzen\u00edch, v\u00a0nich\u017e org\u00e1ny…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":27400,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[1042,1288,4896,324],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27399"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27399"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27399\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/27400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}