{"id":24396,"date":"2023-03-14T01:03:47","date_gmt":"2023-03-14T00:03:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=24396"},"modified":"2023-03-14T07:36:20","modified_gmt":"2023-03-14T06:36:20","slug":"lenka-prochazkova-kolo-se-roztaci","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2023\/03\/14\/lenka-prochazkova-kolo-se-roztaci\/","title":{"rendered":"Lenka Proch\u00e1zkov\u00e1: Kolo se rozt\u00e1\u010d\u00ed"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Komentovan\u00e9 z\u00e1pisky ze soudn\u00edho procesu \u201eDr. Sk\u00e1la a\u00a0spol.\u201c, jeho\u017e jsem se coby ve\u0159ejnost z\u00fa\u010dastnila. P\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek je dlouh\u00fd, ale necht\u011bla jsem jej zve\u0159ej\u0148ovat po\u00a0\u010d\u00e1stech, aby \u010dten\u00e1\u0159 neztratil n\u00e1vaznost.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

U Obvodn\u00edho soudu pro Prahu 7 pokra\u010dovalo v\u00a0p\u00e1tek 3.\u00a0b\u0159ezna hlavn\u00ed l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed v\u00a0trestn\u00ed v\u011bci \u201eDr. Sk\u00e1la a\u00a0spol.\u201c, kter\u00e9 zapo\u010dalo 1.\u00a02.\u00a02023.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ob\u017ealovan\u00ed (Dr. Josef Sk\u00e1la, Ing. Juraj V\u00e1clav\u00edk,\u00a0\u0161\u00e9fredaktor Svobodn\u00e9ho r\u00e1dia\u00a0Vladim\u00edr Kapal a\u00a0So\u0148a Zikmundov\u00e1\u00a0(p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b Spolku SR) jsou st\u00edhan\u00ed podle\u00a0\u00a7\u00a0405 Tr.\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u00edku\u00a0(pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed, zpochyb\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed, schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0ospravedl\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed genocidy). Trestn\u00e9ho skutku se m\u011bli dopustit\u00a02. 7.\u00a02020 v\u00a0debat\u011b\u00a0internetov\u00e9ho Svobodn\u00e9ho r\u00e1dia\u00a0na t\u00e9ma Katy\u0148sk\u00e9ho masakru,\u00a0co\u017e byla masov\u00e1 vra\u017eda polsk\u00fdch v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fdch zajatc\u016f po\u010d\u00e1tkem 40.\u00a0let na sov\u011btsk\u00e9m \u00fazem\u00ed okupovan\u00e9m wehrmachtem hned na za\u010d\u00e1tku tzv.\u00a0\u201cOperace Barbarossa\u201d.<\/p>\n

Po\u0159ad moderoval \u0161\u00e9fredaktor Vladim\u00edr Kapal. Jeho host\u00e9 historik Josef Sk\u00e1la a\u00a0spisovatel Juraj V\u00e1clav\u00edk (p\u00ed\u0161\u00edc\u00ed pod jm\u00e9nem Ji\u0159\u00ed \u0160ifr\u00edn) v\u00a0pr\u016fb\u011bhu odborn\u00e9 diskuze\u00a0seznamovali poslucha\u010de s\u00a0fakty, jejich\u017e souhrn nab\u00edzel\u00a0jinou variantu o\u00a0toto\u017enosti pachatel\u016f masakru polsk\u00fdch d\u016fstojn\u00edk\u016f a\u00a0civilist\u016f, ne\u017e je moment\u00e1ln\u011b roz\u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00e1 verze, \u017ee v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fd zlo\u010din sp\u00e1chala sov\u011btsk\u00e1 NKVD. V\u00a0cel\u00e9m po\u0159adu nezazn\u011bl jedin\u00fd v\u00fdrok, kter\u00fd by zpochyb\u0148oval \u010di\u00a0pop\u00edral, \u017ee v\u00a0Katyni do\u0161lo ke genocid\u011b, nato\u017e aby\u00a0kdokoliv z\u00a0debat\u00e9r\u016f\u00a0v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fd\u00a0zlo\u010din schvaloval \u010di\u00a0ospravedl\u0148oval. Diskuze podlo\u017een\u00e1 argumenty a\u00a0odkazy na jejich zdroje\u00a0je st\u00e1le dohledateln\u00e1 v\u00a0arch\u00edvu SR.\u00a0Odkaz:\u00a0https:\/\/svobodne-radio.com\/2020-07-02-studio-beta-josef-skala-a-jiri-sifrin-katyn\/<\/a><\/p>\n

V\u00a0b\u0159eznu\u00a02022, dva roky po\u00a0odvys\u00edl\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0debaty p\u0159edvolala\u00a0N\u00e1rodn\u00ed centr\u00e1la boje s\u00a0organizovan\u00fdm zlo\u010dinem \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edky\u00a0po\u0159adu, aby podali vysv\u011btlen\u00ed. Obvinila je z\u00a0poru\u0161en\u00ed\u00a0\u00a7\u00a0405 Trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kon\u00edku. V\u0161ichni t\u0159i akt\u00e9\u0159i\u00a0rozhlasov\u00e9 debaty\u00a0toto obvin\u011bn\u00ed rezolutn\u011b odm\u00edtli. Jejich pr\u00e1vn\u00ed z\u00e1stupci proti n\u011bmu podali zevrubn\u00e9 st\u00ed\u017enosti. Koncem lo\u0148sk\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edjna v\u0161ak samosoudce OS v\u00a0Praze 7 vydal trestn\u00ed p\u0159\u00edkaz, odsuzuj\u00edc\u00ed v\u0161echny t\u0159i ob\u017ealovan\u00e9\u00a0k 8 m\u011bs\u00edc\u016fm odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody s\u00a0podm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fdm odkladem na 15 m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f<\/strong>. Ob\u017ealovan\u00ed se proti rozsudku odvolali, a\u00a0kauza tak pokra\u010dovala\u00a0hlavn\u00edm l\u00ed\u010den\u00edm za jejich \u00fa\u010dasti.<\/p>\n

U\u00a0Obvodn\u00edho soudu pro Prahu 7 (kam p\u0159\u00edpad m\u00edstn\u011b pat\u0159\u00ed, nebo\u0165 ud\u00e1n\u00ed od neexistuj\u00edc\u00ed osoby p\u0159i\u0161lo z\u00a0Prahy 7) se 1.\u00a0\u00fanora 2023 konala prvn\u00ed \u010d\u00e1st hlavn\u00edho l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed. Do nevelk\u00e9 soudn\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b se ve\u0161la jen asi t\u0159etina\u00a0shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00e9\u00a0ve\u0159ejnosti, dal\u0161\u00ed des\u00edtky lid\u00ed\u00a0\u010dekaly\u00a0na chodb\u011b a\u00a0sledovaly\u00a0pr\u016fb\u011bh jedn\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00fd p\u0159en\u00e1\u0161ela TV\u00a0Raptor, na mobiln\u00edch telefonech. Na chodb\u011b jsem post\u00e1vala i\u00a0j\u00e1. Po\u00a0p\u0159e\u010dten\u00ed ob\u017ealoby a\u00a0vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch, \u017ee nec\u00edt\u00ed vinu, samosoudce jedn\u00e1n\u00ed odro\u010dil na 3.\u00a0b\u0159ezna. Sl\u00edbil, \u017ee pro velk\u00fd z\u00e1jem ve\u0159ejnosti zajist\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed soudn\u00ed s\u00e1l. To bohu\u017eel nesplnil, a\u00a0tak i\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed prob\u00edhalo\u00a0v neodpov\u00eddaj\u00edc\u00edch prostor\u00e1ch, kam se ve\u0161lo jen asi 30\u00a0lid\u00ed a\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed\u00a0p\u0159\u00edznivci Svobodn\u00e9ho r\u00e1dia (a\u00a0svobody slova), kte\u0159\u00ed p\u0159ijeli do Prahy i\u00a0ze vzd\u00e1len\u00fdch m\u00edst republiky, museli\u00a0\u010dekat na chodb\u011b. J\u00e1 jsem tentokr\u00e1t m\u011bla \u0161t\u011bst\u00ed a\u00a0z\u00edskala m\u00edsto uvnit\u0159 soudn\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b.<\/p>\n

Chronologie hlavn\u00edho jedn\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0<\/b>3.\u00a03.\u00a02023\u00a0<\/b>zachycen\u00e1 z\u00a0pozn\u00e1mek u\u010din\u011bn\u00fdch v\u00a0soudn\u00ed s\u00edni a\u00a0dopln\u011bn\u00e1 ze zvukov\u00e9ho z\u00e1znamu.<\/b><\/p>\n

9.\u00a000 Soud vyslechl kr\u00e1tk\u00e9 prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed Soni Zikmundov\u00e9\u00a0<\/b>(ur\u010den\u00e9 osoby za spolek Svobodn\u00e9 r\u00e1dio) k\u00a0ob\u017ealob\u011b.\u00a0Po prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed, \u017ee se nec\u00edt\u00ed vinn\u00e1,\u00a0p\u0159ipomenula \u00fatok na redakci\u00a0francouzsk\u00e9ho \u010dasopisu\u00a0Charlie Hebdo\u00a0v lednu roku 2015\u00a0a n\u00e1slednou demonstraci p\u0159edn\u00edch evropsk\u00fdch politik\u016f v\u00a0Pa\u0159\u00ed\u017ei, kte\u0159\u00ed se manifesta\u010dn\u011b p\u0159ihl\u00e1sili k\u00a0obhajob\u011b pr\u00e1va na svobodu projevu.\u00a0Poznamenala, \u017ee Svobodn\u00e9 r\u00e1dio je protiv\u00e1le\u010dn\u00e9 a\u00a0z\u00e1sadn\u011b\u00a0odsuzuje\u00a0jakoukoliv genocidu.\u00a0Ve zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9m po\u0159adu,\u00a0kter\u00fd je p\u0159edm\u011btem dokazov\u00e1n\u00ed,\u00a0se nikdo z\u00a0\u00fa\u010dastn\u00edk\u016f nedopustil trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu podle\u00a0\u00a7\u00a0405 Tr.\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u00edku\u00a0(schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed genocidy atd.) a\u00a0tedy i\u00a0ona,\u00a0coby p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b spolku Svobodn\u00e9 r\u00e1dio\u00a0ob\u017ealobu\u00a0odm\u00edt\u00e1.<\/p>\n

9.\u00a030 S<\/b>t\u00e1tn\u00ed z\u00e1stupkyn\u011b\u00a0<\/b>Mgr. Jana Behensk\u00e1<\/b>\u00a0p\u0159e\u010detla ob\u017ealobu,<\/b>\u00a0jej\u00ed\u017e pln\u00e9 zn\u011bn\u00ed je v\u00a0n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edm odkazu :\u00a0https:\/\/spolecenstvi-prak.cz\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/20220929_obzaloba-2.pdf<\/a>. V\u00a0z\u00e1v\u011bru ob\u017ealoby zazn\u011blo:\u00a0\u201eLze u\u010dinit z\u00e1v\u011br, \u017ee ob\u017ealovan\u00ed\u00a0Vladim\u00edr Kapal, PhDr. Josef Sk\u00e1la, Csc., a\u00a0Ing.\u00a0Juraj V\u00e1clav\u00edk naplnili sv\u00fdm jedn\u00e1n\u00edm v\u0161echny z\u00e1konn\u00e9 znaky skutkov\u00e9 podstaty p\u0159e\u010dinu pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed, zpochyb\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed, schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0ospravedl\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed genocidia podle \u00a7 405 trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kon\u00edku, a\u00a0to jak po\u00a0str\u00e1nce objektivn\u00ed, tak i\u00a0po\u00a0str\u00e1nce subjektivn\u00ed, nebo\u0165 v\u00a0r\u00e1mci diskuzn\u00edho rozhlasov\u00e9ho po\u0159adu Svobodn\u00e9ho r\u00e1dia \u2013 Studio Beta vys\u00edlan\u00e9ho prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm internetu, jeho\u017e z\u00e1znam byl pot\u00e9 um\u00edst\u011bn na YouTube, opakovan\u011b ve\u0159ejn\u011b odm\u00edtali, relativizovali a\u00a0zleh\u010dovali sov\u011btskou odpov\u011bdnost a\u00a0samotn\u00fd pr\u016fb\u011bh tzv.\u00a0Katy\u0148sk\u00e9ho masakru, kter\u00fd je souhrnn\u00fdm ozna\u010den\u00edm pro s\u00e9rii masov\u00fdch vra\u017ed p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b polsk\u00fdch v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fdch zajatc\u016f sp\u00e1chan\u00fdch v\u00a0roce 1940 p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00edky Lidov\u00e9ho komisari\u00e1tu vnit\u0159n\u00edch z\u00e1le\u017eitost\u00ed Sov\u011btsk\u00e9ho svazu tzv.\u00a0NKVD, a\u010dkoliv se jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0v\u0161eobecn\u011b zn\u00e1m\u00e9 historick\u00e9 skute\u010dnosti a\u00a0nezpochybniteln\u00e1 fakta, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e tzv.\u00a0Katy\u0148sk\u00fd masakr lze pova\u017eovat za v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fd zlo\u010din.<\/p>\n

Rovn\u011b\u017e tak lze na z\u00e1klad\u011b shora uveden\u00e9ho u\u010dinit z\u00e1v\u011br, \u017ee obvin\u011bn\u00fd Spolek Svobodn\u00e9 r\u00e1dio, z.s. naplnil sv\u00fdm jedn\u00e1n\u00edm popsan\u00fdm ve v\u00fdroku ob\u017ealoby v\u0161echny z\u00e1konn\u00e9 znaky skutkov\u00e9 podstaty p\u0159e\u010dinu pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed, zpochyb\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed, schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0ospravedl\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed genocidia podle \u00a7 405 trestn\u00edho z\u00e1kon\u00edku, a\u00a0to jak po\u00a0str\u00e1nce objektivn\u00ed tak i\u00a0po\u00a0str\u00e1nce subjektivn\u00ed \u2026<\/p>\n

Jedn\u00e1n\u00ed ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch je zejm\u00e9na vzhledem k obecn\u00e9mu z\u00e1jmu st\u00e1tu na ochran\u011b spole\u010dnosti p\u0159ed pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00edm, schvalov\u00e1n\u00edm a\u00a0ospravedl\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00edm v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fdch zlo\u010din\u016f natolik spole\u010densky \u0161kodliv\u00e9, \u017ee neposta\u010duje uplatn\u011bn\u00ed jejich odpov\u011bdnosti podle jin\u00e9ho pr\u00e1vn\u00edho p\u0159edpisu a\u00a0je na m\u00edst\u011b pou\u017eit\u00ed trestn\u00ed represe.\u201c<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

S<\/b>amosoudce<\/b>\u00a0JUDr. Tom\u00e1\u0161 H<\/b>\u00fc<\/b>bner\u00a0<\/b>na \u017e\u00e1dost ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch umo\u017enil<\/b>,\u00a0aby kompletn\u00ed z\u00e1znam r<\/b>ozhlasov\u00e9<\/b>\u00a0diskuze z\u00a0\u010dervence roku 2020 byl v\u00a0soudn<\/b>\u00ed\u00a0s\u00edni p\u0159ehr\u00e1n.<\/b><\/p>\n

Ve\u0159ejnost p\u0159\u00edtomn\u00e1 ve zcela zapln\u011bn\u00e9m s\u00e1le se tak mohla sezn\u00e1mit s\u00a0d\u016fkazn\u00edm materi\u00e1lem.\u00a0Po skon\u010den\u00ed poslechu nahr\u00e1vky se k\u00a0n\u00ed ob\u017ealovan\u00ed stru\u010dn\u011b vyj\u00e1d\u0159ili.\"\"<\/p>\n

Vladim\u00edr Kapal<\/b>: \u201eTe\u010f jste jasn\u011b sly\u0161eli, \u017ee v\u00a0cel\u00e9m po\u0159adu nezazn\u011blo jedin\u00e9 slovo, kter\u00e9 by zpochyb\u0148ovalo genocidu.\u201c<\/p>\n

Dr. Josef Sk\u00e1la:<\/b>\u00a0\u201eJsem r\u00e1d, \u017ee po\u0159ad byl p\u0159ehr\u00e1n u\u00a0soudu. Nic jsme v\u00a0debat\u011b nepop\u00edrali a\u00a0nic jsme kategoricky netvrdili. Ka\u017edou svou v\u011btu jsem p\u0159ipraven dolo\u017eit.\u201c<\/p>\n

Ing. Juraj V\u00e1clav\u00edk<\/b>\u00a0\u201eOhrazuji se z\u00a0toho, abych byl na\u0159\u010den z\u00a0pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed zla!\u201c<\/p>\n

N\u00e1sledovala kr\u00e1tk\u00e1 p\u0159est\u00e1vka, ob\u017ealovan\u00ed a\u00a0ve\u0159ejnost vy\u0161li na chodbu, kde \u010dekaly dal\u0161\u00ed des\u00edtky lid\u00ed. Po\u00a0\u010dtvrt hodin\u011b hlavn\u00ed l\u00ed\u010den\u00ed pokra\u010dovalo.<\/p>\n

S<\/b>amosoudce\u00a0<\/b>prov\u00e1d\u011bl tzv.\u00a0nahl\u00ed\u017een\u00ed do listin<\/b>\u00a0a\u00a0p\u0159e\u010detl\u00a0prvn\u00ed\u00a0ze t\u0159\u00ed znaleck\u00fdch posudk\u016f, kter\u00e9 na \u017e\u00e1dost policejn\u00edch vy\u0161et\u0159ovatel\u016f byly vypracov\u00e1ny\u00a0v p\u0159\u00edpravn\u00e9m \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Ob\u017ealovan\u00ed i\u00a0jejich obh\u00e1jci posudek\u00a0znali (m\u011bli jej\u00a0p\u0159edem p\u00edsemn\u011b), ale\u00a0ve\u0159ejnost jej\u00a0sly\u0161ela poprv\u00e9 a\u00a0byla (coby sv\u011bdek z\u00e1znamu rozhlasov\u00e9 debaty) konsternovan\u00e1 jeho\u00a0obsahem i\u00a0formou.\u00a0Posudek vypracoval<\/b>\u00a0<\/b>doc.\u00a0<\/b>Ji\u0159\u00ed Vy<\/b>k<\/b>oukal CSc.)\u00a0<\/b>z Institutu mezin\u00e1rodn\u00edch studi\u00ed Fakulty soci\u00e1ln\u00edch v\u011bd UK.\u00a0<\/b>Ve sv\u00e9 expert\u00edze konstatoval, \u017ee\u00a0z\u00e1m\u011brem po\u0159adu bylo pop\u0159en\u00ed sov\u011btsk\u00e9 odpov\u011bdnosti za katy\u0148sk\u00e9 vra\u017edy\u00a0\u201emoder\u00e1tor vedl debatu ke k\u00fd\u017een\u00fdm z\u00e1v\u011br\u016fm\u201c \u2013. D\u00e1le znalec debat\u00e9ry\u00a0ve sv\u00e9 expert\u00edze\u00a0obvi\u0148uje\u00a0z\u00a0\u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed konspira\u010dn\u00edch teori\u00ed, rozporuje tvrzen\u00ed, kter\u00e1 v\u00a0relaci zazn\u011bla, naz\u00fdv\u00e1 je \u201ep\u0159ed\u017ev\u00fdkan\u00fdmi texty\u201c a\u00a0dehonestuje diskut\u00e9ry.\u00a0Obvi\u0148uje je za to, \u017ee v\u00a0debat\u011b zpochybnili zdroje, z\u00a0nich\u017e vych\u00e1z\u00ed\u00a0ofici\u00e1ln\u00ed\u00a0verze, tedy, \u017ee vin\u00edkem je NKVD a\u00a0\u017ee zpochybnili charaktery t\u011bch, co tyto doklady p\u0159edlo\u017eili. Jmenovit\u011b Gorba\u010dova a\u00a0Jelcina.<\/p>\n

K tomuto posudku se ob\u017ealovan\u00ed stru\u010dn\u011b vyj\u00e1d\u0159ili.<\/p>\n

Dr.\u00a0<\/b>Josef\u00a0<\/b>Sk\u00e1la:\u00a0<\/b>Odm\u00edt\u00e1m, \u017ee jsme pracovali s\u00a0\u201ep\u0159ed\u017ev\u00fdkan\u00fdmi texty\u201c. Naopak\u00a0jsme\u00a0poslucha\u010de\u00a0seznamovali s\u00a0nov\u00fdmi poznatky od nerusk\u00fdch autor\u016f z\u00a0USA, Francie i\u00a0Polska. D\u00e1le\u00a0J. Sk\u00e1la\u00a0uvedl, \u017ee soudu zaslal dal\u0161\u00ed znaleck\u00e9 dokumenty, anal\u00fdzy atd. \u201eDouf\u00e1m, \u017ee toto bude spravedliv\u00fd proces a\u00a0tyto d\u016fkazy budou zp\u0159\u00edstupn\u011bny.\u201c<\/p>\n

Zm\u00ednil\u00a0se i\u00a0o\u00a0prac\u00edch historika \u017dukova a\u00a0Dr. Kolesnika a\u00a0o\u00a0Norimbersk\u00e9m procesu, kde mezi zlo\u010diny na v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fdch zajatc\u00edch byla projedn\u00e1v\u00e1na i\u00a0Katyn\u011b.<\/p>\n

\u201e\u017dasnu, \u017ee znalci\u00a0nen\u00ed zn\u00e1ma dokumentace nerusk\u00fdch autor\u016f po\u00a0roce 1990.\u00a0a\u00a0argumentuje obecn\u011b, nezn\u00e1 argumenty proti verzi, kterou uvedl\u00a0do ob\u011bhu Goebbels.\u201c\u00a0Sk\u00e1la jmenuje experty a\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed d\u016fkazn\u00ed materi\u00e1ly, videonahr\u00e1vku ur\u010denou pro Medv\u011bd\u011bva, na kter\u00e9 poslanec Dumy dozn\u00e1v\u00e1, \u017ee byl nav\u0161t\u00edven pracovn\u00edkem tajn\u00e9 slu\u017eby, kter\u00fd doznal, \u017ee jim Jelcinova parta ukl\u00e1dala, aby fal\u0161ovali dokumenty a\u00a0oni do nich vn\u00e1\u0161eli drobn\u00e1 pochyben\u00ed, aby p\u0159i\u00a0budouc\u00edm zkoum\u00e1n\u00ed bylo\u00a0jasn\u00e9, \u017ee se jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0falza. Jin\u00e1 videonahr\u00e1vka ukazuje doli\u010dn\u00e9 p\u0159edm\u011bty (raz\u00edtka p\u0159edstavuj\u00edc\u00ed podpisy,\u00a0dobov\u00e9\u00a0hlavi\u010dkov\u00e9 pap\u00edry atd.) s\u00a0nimi\u017e bylo fal\u0161ov\u00e1n\u00ed uskute\u010dn\u011bno. \u201eP\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1m, \u017ee budeme m\u00edt spravedliv\u00fd proces a\u00a0tyto d\u016fkazn\u00ed materi\u00e1ly budou zp\u0159\u00edstupn\u011bny\u201c.<\/p>\n

Vladim\u00edr Kapal:<\/b>\u00a0\u201eVe\u0161ker\u00e1 argumentace tohoto znalce, kter\u00fd vypracoval posudek, poch\u00e1z\u00ed a\u017e z\u00a0devades\u00e1t\u00fdch let.<\/p>\n

S<\/b>oudce<\/b>\u00a0jej ok\u0159ikl:<\/b>\u00a0M\u011b zaj\u00edm\u00e1\u00a0rozhlasov\u00e1\u00a0diskuze, ne Katy\u0148!<\/p>\n

V.\u00a0<\/b>Kapal<\/b>: \u201eTak pro\u010d m\u011b za ni soud\u00edte? Diskuze vych\u00e1zela ze v\u0161ech materi\u00e1l\u016f i\u00a0z t\u011bch\u00a0p\u0159ed 90 t\u00fdm rokem.\u00a0Patolog\u00a0Prof.\u00a0Franti\u0161ek H\u00e1jek\u00a0(kter\u00fd byl \u010dlenem vy\u0161et\u0159ov<\/i>a<\/i>c\u00ed komise eses\u00e1k\u016f)<\/i>, podepsal zpr\u00e1vu o\u00a0Katyni na n\u00e1tlak N\u011bmc\u016f.\u00a0Jeho ma\u010farsk\u00fd kolega, kter\u00fd jim to nepodepsal, zmizel.\u00a0Po kv\u011btnu 1945 sezn\u00e1mil\u00a0Prof. H\u00e1jek\u00a0ve\u0159ejnost o\u00a0pravd\u011b v\u00a0knize \u201eD\u016fkazy katy\u0148sk\u00e9.\u201c\u00a0a na l\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00e9m konziliu.\u201c<\/p>\n

S<\/b>oudce:<\/b>\u00a0P\u0159edt\u00edm ho m\u011bla mo\u017en\u00e1 v\u00a0rukou STB a\u00a0mo\u017en\u00e1 KGB.<\/p>\n

Obh\u00e1jce (<\/b>V.\u00a0<\/b>Kapala)<\/b>: To mysl\u00edte v\u00e1\u017en\u011b tuhle polemiku?<\/p>\n

Soudce<\/b>: J\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dnou polemiku ohledn\u011b Katyn\u011b nehodl\u00e1m v\u00e9st. Vyjad\u0159ujte se ke znaleck\u00e9mu posudku, nebo jinak v\u00e1m odejmu slovo.<\/p>\n

Kapal:<\/b>\u00a0V\u00a0roce 1945 nebyla StB.<\/p>\n

Docent Vykoukal je zaujat\u00fd.<\/p>\n

J\u00e1 nev\u00edm, co tady (p\u0159ed soudem) d\u011bl\u00e1m. Nic jsme nezpochyb\u0148ovali, jen jsme se bavili o\u00a0nov\u00fdch faktech.<\/p>\n

Juraj V\u00e1clav\u00edk:<\/b>\u00a0Gorba\u010dov a\u00a0jeho veden\u00ed se p\u0159ihl\u00e1sili ke goebbelsovsk\u00e9 verzi.<\/p>\n

Soudce \u010dte dal\u0161\u00ed exper<\/b>t<\/b>\u00edzu od docenta\u00a0<\/b>Ji\u0159\u00edho\u00a0<\/b>Fr<\/b>ie<\/b>dla\u00a0<\/b>\u2013<\/p>\n

Hlavn\u00ed tvrzen\u00ed experta, \u017ee debat\u00e9\u0159i \u010derpali z\u00a0d\u00e1vno vyvr\u00e1cen\u00e9 sov\u011btsk\u00e9 propagace. V\u00a0posudku u\u017e\u00edv\u00e1 v\u011bty jako \u201eSk\u00e1lovy vylhan\u00e9 konstrukce\u201c atd.<\/p>\n

J.\u00a0<\/b>Sk\u00e1la:\u00a0<\/b>Ot\u00e1zka je, zda jsme v\u00a0debat\u011b postupovali podle \u00fastavy a\u00a0Listiny (LZPS). A\u00a0j\u00e1 odpov\u00edd\u00e1m, \u017ee stoprocentn\u011b. Bez ohledu na to, m\u00e1m p\u0159ipraveno 25 ot\u00e1zek na znalce. Byl bych r\u00e1d, kdybych mu je u\u00a0soudu mohl polo\u017eit.<\/p>\n

Soudce p\u0159edkl\u00e1d\u00e1 dal\u0161\u00ed listinu \u2013 \u010dl\u00e1nek z\u00a0Aktu\u00e1ln\u011b.cz<\/b><\/p>\n

J.\u00a0<\/b>Sk\u00e1la reaguje:<\/b>\u00a0M\u00e1m d\u016fvodn\u00e9 podez\u0159en\u00ed, \u017ee\u00a0tento \u010dl\u00e1nek\u00a0je ops\u00e1n do p\u00edsmene z\u00a0protektor\u00e1tn\u00edho tisku.<\/p>\n

V.\u00a0<\/b>Kapal:<\/b>\u00a0V\u00a0Norimbersk\u00e9m soudu se na \u017e\u00e1dost sov\u011btsk\u00e9ho \u017ealobce Katy\u0148 prob\u00edrala. Bylo uvedeno i\u00a0jm\u00e9no velitele,\u00a0kter\u00fd masakru velel, ale\u00a0nakonec byl souzen v\u00a0jin\u00e9m procesu. P\u00ed\u0161e o\u00a0tom \u010desk\u00fd zpravodaj u\u00a0Norimbersk\u00e9ho soudu\u00a0zpravodaj delegovan\u00fd za \u010cSR Dr. Rostislav\u00a0Kocourek.<\/p>\n

(Soud tento listinn\u00fd d\u016fkaz\u00a0<\/i>posl\u00e9ze<\/i>\u00a0nep\u0159ijal, ale pro informaci \u010dten\u00e1\u0159\u016f\u00a0<\/i>zve\u0159ej\u0148ujeme\u00a0<\/i>sv\u011bdectv\u00ed Dr. Kocourka zaznamenan\u00e9 v\u00a0jeho knize \u201eSv\u011bt \u017ealuje v\u00a0Norimberku\u201c:\"\"<\/i><\/p>\n

Zpr\u00e1va vy<\/i><\/span>\u0161et\u0159ovac\u00ed st\u00e1tn\u00ed komis<\/i><\/span>e<\/i><\/span>\u00a0SSSR, kter\u00e1 m\u011bla za \u010dlena p\u0159edsedu V\u0161eslovansk\u00e9ho v\u00fdboru gener\u00e1la Gordunova, akademika Burdenka, spisovatele Alexeje Tolst\u00e9ho, p\u0159edsedu V\u00fdkonn\u00e9ho v\u00fdboru \u010cerven\u00e9ho k\u0159\u00ed\u017ee a\u00a0\u010cerven\u00e9ho p\u016flm\u011bsice Kolesnikova, p\u0159ednostu l\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00e9ho odd\u011blen\u00ed Rud\u00e9 arm\u00e1dy gener\u00e1la Smirnova, p\u0159edsedu Okresn\u00edho v\u00fdkonn\u00e9ho v\u00fdboru Smolenska Melnikova a\u00a0lidov\u00e9ho komisa\u0159e v\u00fdchovy akademika Pot<\/i><\/span>\u011b<\/i><\/span>mkina:<\/i><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cNa z\u00e1klad\u011b v\u0161eho materi\u00e1lu, v\u00fdslechu v\u00edce ne\u017e jednoho sta sv\u011bdk\u016f, zpr\u00e1v l\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00fdch odborn\u00edk\u016f, dokument\u016f a\u00a0doklad\u016f, osobn\u00edho majetku nalezen\u00e9ho v\u00a0hrobech v\u00a0Katynsk\u00e9m lese, do\u0161li jsme k\u00a0t\u011bmto kone\u010dn\u00fdm z\u00e1v\u011br\u016fm: Pol\u0161t\u00ed zajatci byli dr\u017eeni p\u0159ed v\u00e1lkou ve t\u0159ech t\u00e1borech na z\u00e1pad\u011b od Smolenska a\u00a0zam\u011bstn\u00e1n\u00ed na stavb\u011b dr\u00e1hy. Z\u016fstali tam, i\u00a0kdy\u017e N\u011bmci v\u00a0z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed 1941 obsadili Smolensk. Na podzim roku 1941 n\u011bmeck\u00e9 okupa\u010dn\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ady vykonaly v\u00a0Katynsk\u00e9m lese hromadnou popravu polsk\u00fdch v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fdch zajatc\u016f ze zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00fdch t\u00e1bor\u016f.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n

Zajatci byli post\u0159\u00edleni vojenskou n\u011bmeckou jednotkou, kamuflovanou jm\u00e9nem Staff 537, z\u00e1kopnick\u00fd prapor. Velel nadporu\u010d\u00edk Arnes, nadporu\u010d\u00edk Rechts a\u00a0poru\u010d\u00edk Hott.\u00a0<\/i><\/p>\n

Kdy\u017e se celkov\u00e1 politick\u00e1 situace na konci roku 1943 pro N\u011bmecko zhor\u0161ila, n\u011bmeck\u00e9 \u00fa\u0159ady u\u010dinily \u0159adu opat\u0159en\u00ed, aby uvalily vinu ze sv\u00fdch vlastn\u00edch ukrutnost\u00ed na sov\u011btsk\u00e9 organisace, vyprovokovaly tak obyvatelstvo a\u00a0probudily spory mezi Rusy a\u00a0Pol\u00e1ky.<\/i><\/p>\n

P\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm se N\u011bmci sna\u017eili p\u0159emlouv\u00e1n\u00edm, podpl\u00e1cen\u00edm, hrozbami, barbarsk\u00fdm mu\u010den\u00edm naj\u00edt sv\u011bdky mezi sov\u011btsk\u00fdmi ob\u010dany,aby od nich dostali fale\u0161n\u00e9 v\u00fdpov\u011bdi, jako by pol\u0161t\u00ed v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00ed zajatci byli post\u0159\u00edleni sov\u011btsk\u00fdmi organisacemi na ja\u0159e 1940.<\/i><\/p>\n

Za druh\u00e9, p\u0159ivezli na ja\u0159e 1943 dal\u0161\u00ed mrtvoly polsk\u00fdch zajatc\u016f z\u00a0nejr\u016fzn\u011bj\u0161\u00edch m\u00edst a\u00a0dali je do otev\u0159en\u00fdch hrob\u016f. To m\u011blo dvoj\u00ed \u00fa\u010del. Jednak zakr\u00fdt vlastn\u00ed zlo\u010diny, sp\u00e1chan\u00e9 na polsk\u00fdch zajatc\u00edch na jin\u00fdch m\u00edstech,a pak rozmno\u017eit po\u010det \u201cob\u011bt\u00ed\u00a0 bol\u0161evick\u00fdch zv\u011brstev v\u00a0Katynsk\u00e9m lese\u201d. V\u00a0dob\u011b,kdy p\u0159ipravovali tyto provokace n\u011bmeck\u00e9 okupa\u010dn\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ady zam\u011bstn\u00e1valy na 500 sov\u011btsk\u00fdch v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fdch zajatc\u016f p\u0159i\u00a0kop\u00e1n\u00ed hrob\u016f v\u00a0Katynsk\u00e9m lese. Jakmile hroby byly vykop\u00e1ny, sov\u011bt\u0161t\u00ed zajatci byli post\u0159\u00edleni.<\/i><\/p>\n

Pr\u00e1vn\u00edm a\u00a0l\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00fdm vy\u0161et\u0159en\u00edm bylo nade v\u0161i pochybnost zji\u0161t\u011bno, \u017ee st\u0159\u00edlen\u00ed bylo provedeno na podzim 1941. D\u00e1le, \u017ee n\u011bme\u010dt\u00ed kati pou\u017e\u00edvali p\u0159i\u00a0vra\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed polsk\u00fdch v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fdch zajatc\u016f tut\u00e9\u017e methodu jako p\u0159i\u00a0hromadn\u00fdch vra\u017ed\u00e1ch sov\u011btsk\u00fdch ob\u010dan\u016f v\u00a0Orlu, Voron\u011b\u017ei, Krasnodaru a\u00a0v\u00a0sam\u00e9m Smolensku, to jest r\u00e1nu z\u00a0pistole zezadu do krku.<\/i><\/p>\n

V\u00fdpov\u011bdi sv\u011bdk\u016f, n\u00e1lezy l\u00e9ka\u0159sk\u00e9 komise a\u00a0materi\u00e1l objeven\u00fd ve hrobech pln\u011b potvrzuj\u00ed tyto z\u00e1v\u011bry\u201d. Tak kon\u010d\u00ed citaci t\u00e9to zpr\u00e1vy dr. Rostislav Kocourek.)<\/i><\/p>\n

Soudce \u010dte z\u00a0listinn\u00fdch dokument\u016f ob\u017ealoby \u010dl\u00e1nek z\u00a0\u010cT24 o\u00a0tom, \u017ee 26.\u00a011.\u00a02010 St\u00e1tn\u00ed Duma uznala vinu za Katy\u0148.<\/b><\/p>\n

J.\u00a0<\/b>V\u00e1clav\u00edk<\/b>\u00a0:\u00a0reaguje t\u00edm, \u017ee\u00a0Stalin\u016fv vnuk\u00a0Dumu \u017ealoval a\u00a0dos\u00e1hl u\u00a0soudu toho, \u017ee k\u00a0jej\u00edmu usnesen\u00ed muselo b\u00fdt dopln\u011bno, \u017ee se jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0soukrom\u00e9 n\u00e1zory jednotliv\u00fdch hlasuj\u00edc\u00edch.<\/p>\n

J.\u00a0<\/b>Sk\u00e1la:\u00a0<\/b>komentuje \u00faryvky\u00a0k\u00a0t\u00e9matu Katyn\u011b z\u00a0Goebbelsov\u00fdch den\u00edk\u016f\u00a0(kter\u00e9 vy\u0161ly i\u00a0v\u00a0\u010de\u0161tin\u011b).<\/p>\n

Ve zd\u011b\u0161en\u00ed po\u00a0Stalingradu\u00a0Goebbels p\u0159em\u00fd\u0161l\u00ed, jak by se z\u00a0toho propagandisticky vyhrabali\u00a0a zapisuje si:\u00a0Mus\u00edme sp\u00e1chat n\u011bco ve velk\u00e9m stylu v\u00a0antibol\u0161evick\u00e9 propagand\u011b.<\/p>\n

V\u00a0pozd\u011bj\u0161\u00edm z\u00e1pisu\u00a0velice obdivuje\u00a0lstivost a\u00a0obratnost, \u201es jakou jsme pochopili, \u017ee z\u00a0Katyn\u011b ud\u011bl\u00e1me vysoce politickou ot\u00e1zku.\u201c<\/p>\n

Pozd\u011bj\u0161\u00ed den\u00edkov\u00fd z\u00e1znam:<\/p>\n

\u201eV hrobech Katyn\u011b byla bohu\u017eel nalezena n\u011bmeck\u00e1 munice. Mus\u00edme objasnit, jak se tam dostala. Ka\u017edop\u00e1dn\u011b je nezbytn\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpad utajovat. Pokud by se o\u00a0n\u011bm dov\u011bd\u011bli na\u0161i nep\u0159\u00e1tel\u00e9, stala by se cel\u00e1 katy\u0148sk\u00e1 z\u00e1le\u017eitost bezp\u0159edm\u011btn\u00e1.\u201c<\/p>\n

\"\"Soudce \u010dte dal\u0161\u00ed listinu<\/b>\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Dopis Spolku katy\u0148sk\u00e1 rodina<\/b>, v\u00a0n\u011bm\u017e si auto\u0159i\u00a0(\u010dlenov\u00e9 spolku)\u00a0st\u011b\u017euj\u00ed na po\u0159ad ve Svobodn\u00e9m\u00a0r\u00e1diu, kde se\u00a0dle\u00a0nich\u00a0zkreslovala historie. \u201eOmlouv\u00e1n\u00ed a\u00a0zpochyb\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed sov\u011btsk\u00e9 genocidy je trestuhodn\u00e9\u201c.<\/p>\n

Ukazuje se, \u017ee dopis byl soudem zalo\u017een do d\u016fkazn\u00edch listin 1.3.2023 (!)<\/p>\n

Podobn\u00fd obsah m\u011bl i\u00a0soudcem p\u0159e\u010dten\u00fd\u00a0dopis velvyslance Polska v\u00a0\u010cR<\/p>\n

O<\/b>bh\u00e1jce\u00a0<\/b>V.\u00a0<\/b>Kapala<\/b>\u00a0trv\u00e1 na sly\u0161en\u00ed znalce Ji\u0159\u00edho Plach\u00e9ho, jeho\u017e znaleck\u00fd posudek je ve spisu,\u00a0ale nebyl \u010dten.<\/p>\n

Dr.\u00a0<\/b>Sk\u00e1la<\/b>\u00a0trv\u00e1 na p\u0159edveden\u00ed sv\u00fdch listinn\u00fdch d\u016fkaz\u016f.<\/p>\n

Juraj\u00a0<\/b>V\u00e1clav\u00edk<\/b>\u00a0trv\u00e1 na p\u0159edveden\u00ed publikace Prof. Franti\u0161ka H\u00e1jka \u201eD\u016fkazy katy\u0148sk\u00e9\u201c\"\"<\/p>\n

(V t\u00e9to publikaci vydan\u00e9 roku 1946 uzn\u00e1van\u00fd \u010desk\u00fd patolog popisuje, \u017ee se v\u00a0dubnu 1943 musel \u00fa\u010dastnit jako \u010dlen\u00a0<\/i>mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed\u00a0<\/i>komise ohled\u00e1n\u00ed t\u011bl v\u00a0otev\u0159en\u00fdch hrobech v\u00a0Katyni a\u00a0posl\u00e9ze podepsat protokol p\u0159ipraven\u00fd N\u011bmci. Dozn\u00e1v\u00e1, \u017ee (stejn\u011b jako ostatn\u00ed\u00a0<\/i>\u010dlenov\u00e9 komise<\/i>) podepsal pod n\u00e1tlakem a\u00a0dodate\u010dn\u011b pod\u00e1v\u00e1 sv\u011bdectv\u00ed o\u00a0tom, \u017ee zkouman\u00e1 t\u011bla popraven\u00fdch polsk\u00fdch v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fdch zajatc\u016f nemohla le\u017eet v\u00a0hrobech d<\/i>\u00e9<\/i>le ne\u017e rok a\u00a0p\u016fl, co\u017e znamen\u00e1, \u017ee k\u00a0masov\u00e9 vra\u017ed\u011b do\u0161lo a\u017e asi na podzim 1941 a\u00a0pachateli byli n\u011bme\u010dt\u00ed nacist\u00e9.)<\/i><\/p>\n

P\u0159est\u00e1vka\u00a015 minut,\u00a0aby soud zv\u00e1\u017eil, kter\u00e9 listiny p\u0159edvede<\/b><\/p>\n

Ve\u0159ejnost debatuje na chodb\u011b a\u00a0v\u011bt\u0161ina z\u00a0n\u00e1s (co\u00a0jsme\u00a0byli p\u0159edt\u00edm v\u00a0soudn\u00ed s\u00edni) se domn\u00edv\u00e1, \u017ee kv\u016fli mno\u017estv\u00ed dokument\u016f obhajoby a\u00a0p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dan\u00e9\u00a0d\u00e9lce jejich \u010dten\u00ed bude jedn\u00e1n\u00ed odro\u010deno.<\/p>\n

Po p\u0159est\u00e1vce<\/b>\u00a0v\u0161ak soudce oznamuje, \u017ee se nebude zab\u00fdvat dal\u0161\u00edmi navrhovan\u00fdmi listinn\u00fdmi d\u016fkazy.\u00a0\u201e<\/b>Soud je p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010den o\u00a0tom, \u017ee m\u00e1 dostatek dokazov\u00e1n\u00ed k\u00a0tomu, aby mohl rozhodnout. Dokazov\u00e1n\u00ed je skon\u010den\u00e9.\u201c<\/b><\/p>\n

St\u00e1tn\u00ed z<\/b>\u00e1stupkyn\u011b \u2013\u00a0<\/b>v\u00a0<\/b>z<\/b>\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn<\/b>\u00e9<\/b>\u00a0\u0159e\u010d<\/b>i\u00a0<\/b>tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee nebyly p\u0159edlo\u017eeny \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 nov\u00e9 d\u016fkazy, kter\u00e9 by kauzu posunuly a\u00a0trv\u00e1 na\u00a0<\/b>ob\u017ealob<\/b>\u011b.<\/b><\/p>\n

Zd\u016fraz\u0148uje, \u017ee trestn\u00fd \u010din se stal ve\u0159ejn\u011b prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm celosv\u011btov\u00e9 s\u00edt\u011b Internet.<\/p>\n

V debat\u011b dle n\u00ed nebyly prezentov\u00e1ny my\u0161lenky a\u00a0n\u00e1zory ale fakta, (kter\u00e1 ona v\u0161ak neuzn\u00e1v\u00e1?) Trestn\u00ed \u010din byl sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n podle\u00a0\u00a7\u00a0405 Tr.\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u00edku.<\/p>\n

Navrhuje tresty v\u00a0doln\u00ed hranici. Svobodn\u00e9 r\u00e1dio je povinno, a\u017e bude rozsudek pravomocn\u00fd, zve\u0159ejnit jeho pln\u00fd text na sv\u00fdch webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch po\u00a0dobu 90\u00a0dn\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Obh\u00e1jce\u00a0<\/b>V.\u00a0<\/b>Kapala \u2013 z\u00e1v\u011br<\/b>e\u010dn\u00e1<\/b>\u00a0\u0159e\u010d:<\/b><\/p>\n

Rozeb\u00edr\u00e1, co znamen\u00e1\u00a0\u00a7\u00a0405 Tr.\u00a0z\u00e1kon\u00edku:<\/p>\n

pop\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed<\/p>\n

zpochyb\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/p>\n

schvalov\u00e1n\u00ed<\/p>\n

ospravedl\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed genocidy.<\/p>\n

Ani jedna z\u00a0t\u011bchto forem nebyla ani n\u00e1znakem prok\u00e1z\u00e1na.<\/p>\n

Trestn\u00fd \u010din podle tohoto paragrafu mus\u00ed b\u00fdt \u00famysln\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Znaleck\u00e9 posudky ob\u017ealoby vych\u00e1z\u00ed z\u00a0literatury po\u00a0roce 1990, \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e1 zm\u00ednka o\u00a0prof. H\u00e1jkovi a\u00a0jeho z\u00e1sadn\u00ed knize \u201eD\u016fkazy katy\u0148sk\u00e9.\u201c Experty d\u00e1v\u00e1m do uvozovek.<\/p>\n

A jak\u00e9 d\u016fkazy ob\u017ealoba na\u0161la v\u00a0\u010dl\u00e1nc\u00edch z\u00a0aktualne.cz a\u00a0z\u00a0webu \u010cT24?<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1stupce Akademie v\u011bd ve sv\u00e9m posudku \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee opa\u010dn\u00e9 stanovisko ne\u017e moment\u00e1ln\u011b \u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00e9 je propaganda!<\/p>\n

Navrhuji, aby moji klienti (V. Kapal a\u00a0So\u0148a Zikmundov\u00e1) byli zpro\u0161t\u011bni.<\/p>\n

JUDr. Bruna (obh\u00e1jce Dr. Sk\u00e1ly) \u2013 z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e1 \u0159e\u010d<\/b><\/p>\n

P\u0159\u00edpad m\u00e1 probl\u00e9my skutkov\u00e9. Nen\u00ed zral\u00fd k\u00a0tomu, aby bylo rozhodnuto.<\/p>\n

Ob\u017ealoba dle m\u00e9ho n\u00e1zoru byla neprojednateln\u00e1. Ale stalo se.<\/p>\n

M\u00e1m v\u00fdhrady ke stavu skutkov\u00e9ho d\u011bje.<\/p>\n

Soud m\u00e1 povinnost dot\u00e1hnout s\u00e1m, co nebylo dota\u017eeno v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpravn\u00e9m \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Org\u00e1ny \u010dinn\u00e9 v\u00a0tr. \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed mus\u00ed posuzovat okolnosti ve prosp\u011bch i\u00a0v\u00a0neprosp\u011bch ob\u017ealovan\u00e9ho, to sam\u00e9 m\u00e1 za povinnost i\u00a0soud.<\/p>\n

St. z\u00e1stupkyn\u011b nem\u00e1 v\u011bc dota\u017eenou, chyb\u00ed argumenty, a\u00a0tak mluv\u00ed obecn\u011b.<\/p>\n

P\u0159edm\u011btem ka\u017ed\u00e9ho tr. \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed je skutek. P\u0159esn\u00e9 vymezen\u00ed skutku v\u00a0ob\u017ealob\u011b mus\u00ed prokazovat vinu.<\/b><\/p>\n

St. z\u00e1stupkyn\u011b toto v\u00a0<\/b>t\u00e9<\/b>\u00a0ob\u017ealob\u011b nem\u00e1.<\/b>\u00a0\u0158\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee ob\u017ealovan\u00ed\u00a0( v\u00a0rozhlasov\u00e9\u00a0debat\u011b)\u00a0ve\u0159ejn\u011b\u00a0odm\u00edtali sov\u011btskou odpov\u011bdnost z\u00a0v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00e9ho zlo\u010dinu v\u00a0Katyni, a\u010dkoliv\u00a0spr\u00e1vnost historick\u00e9ho v\u00fdkladu\u00a0je\u00a0jednozna\u010dn\u011b prok\u00e1z\u00e1na.\u00a0<\/b>Ale\u00a0<\/b>v\u017edy\u0165\u00a0<\/b>d<\/b>op\u0159edu nem\u016f\u017ee b\u00fdt v\u00a0trestn\u00edm \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed nic jednozna\u010dn\u011b prok\u00e1z\u00e1no! To by byla not<\/b>o<\/b>rieta a\u00a0ta\u00a0<\/b>tu nem\u00e1 m\u00edsto,\u00a0<\/b>je dokonce zak\u00e1zan\u00e1. P\u0159ekvapuje m\u011b, \u017ee tady je n\u011bco takov\u00e9ho naps\u00e1no.\u00a0<\/b>D\u00e1le ob\u017ealoba \u0159\u00edk\u00e1: \u201ejednotliv\u00e1 fakta jsou obecn\u011b pokl\u00e1d\u00e1na za nezpochybniteln\u00e1\u201c.\u00a0V\u017edy\u0165 to nen\u00ed pravda a\u00a0ani to nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9.<\/p>\n

Nejslavn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed p\u0159edstavitel kritick\u00e9ho racionalismu minul\u00e9ho stolet\u00ed pan profesor Karl Popper. ten postavil tezi, kter\u00e1 je uzn\u00e1van\u00e1 v\u00a0Americe, v\u00a0Austr\u00e1lii, v\u00a0Evrop\u011b, v\u0161ichni ji znaj\u00ed a\u00a0v\u0161ichni z\u00a0n\u00ed vych\u00e1zej\u00ed. Jen tady se to neuzn\u00e1v\u00e1. A\u00a0pan profesor Popper napsal:<\/p>\n

\u201eKa\u017ed\u00e1\u00a0<\/b>teorie,\u00a0<\/b>ka\u017ed\u00e1\u00a0<\/b>z\u00e1sada mus\u00ed b\u00fdt zpochybniteln\u00e1<\/b>. Tady se budeme pozastavovat nad t\u00edm, \u017ee n\u011bkdo\u00a0<\/b>zpochyb\u0148uje<\/b>\u00a0n\u011bjakou teorii. V\u017edy\u0165 je to po\u017eadavek, kter\u00fd vych\u00e1z\u00ed z\u00a0podstaty v\u011bci! My tady vlastn\u011b napad\u00e1me n\u011bco, co je podstatou v\u011bdeck\u00e9 pr\u00e1ce. M\u016fj klient je v\u011bdec\u2026<\/b><\/p>\n

Tady v\u00a0t\u00e9 ob\u017ealob\u011b\u00a0ke stavu skutkov\u00e9m nen\u00ed \u0159e\u010deno nic.<\/p>\n

Je nep\u0159\u00edpustn\u00e9, aby ob\u017ealoba roz\u0161i\u0159ovala podm\u00ednky trestn\u00ed odpov\u011bdnosti.<\/p>\n

St. z\u00e1stupkyn\u011b \u0159ekla z\u00e1v\u011brem, \u017ee to m\u00e1 prok\u00e1zan\u00e9. P\u0159edm\u011bt t\u00e9to v\u00edry je nesmysln\u00fd. Na str.\u00a05.\u00a0tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee tato problematika (o\u00a0odpov\u011bdnosti za v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fd zlo\u010din) je nezpochybniteln\u00e1. Ka\u017ed\u00e1 \u201epravda\u201c mus\u00ed b\u00fdt zpochybniteln\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Na str.\u00a012.\u00a0p\u00ed\u0161e, \u017ee v\u00a0obecn\u00e9m z\u00e1jmu st\u00e1tu na ochranu spole\u010dnosti je t\u0159eba pou\u017e\u00edt trestn\u00ed represi. O\u010dek\u00e1val jsem, \u017ee n\u00e1m \u0159ekne ty argumenty.\u00a0Kde m\u00e1 jeden jedin\u00fd argument ke spole\u010densk\u00e9 \u0161kodlivosti odborn\u00e9 debaty?<\/b><\/p>\n

Co se t\u00fdk\u00e1 skutkov\u00e9ho stavu, z\u00e1sadn\u00ed je objektivn\u00ed str\u00e1nka v\u011bci \u2013 to m\u00e1 b\u00fdt v\u00a0t\u011bch v\u00fd\u0148atc\u00edch z\u00a0rozhlasov\u00e9 debaty.<\/p>\n

V kauzalit\u011b trestn\u00ed \u010dinnosti plat\u00ed, \u017ee zavin\u011bn\u00ed je sou\u010d\u00e1st\u00ed viny. Tady se p\u00ed\u0161e, \u017ee tu byl \u00famysl. M\u016fj klient, historik a\u00a0kandid\u00e1t v\u011bd \u0161el do r\u00e1dia p\u00e1chat trestnou \u010dinnost? Kde je d\u016fkaz, \u017ee cht\u011bl p\u00e1chat trestnou \u010dinnost? Jako v\u011bdec se cht\u011bl pod\u011blit s\u00a0ve\u0159ejnost\u00ed o\u00a0sv\u00e9 v\u00fdzkumy. Co je na to spole\u010densky \u0161kodliv\u00e9ho?<\/p>\n

Ob\u017ealob\u011b chyb\u00ed argumenty. Z\u00a0n\u011bjak\u00fdch d\u016fvod\u016f m\u011bla b\u00fdt pod\u00e1na, a\u00a0tak byla.<\/b><\/p>\n

Spr\u00e1vn\u011b soudce \u0159ekl, my neposuzujeme katy\u0148skou tragedii, ale to, co o\u00a0n\u00ed bylo v\u00a0debat\u011b \u0159e\u010deno.<\/p>\n

Dle \u010dl\u00e1nku\u00a0<\/b>2.\u00a0\u00fastavy: ve\u0159ejnou moc lze vykon\u00e1vat pouze v\u00a0mez\u00edch z\u00e1kona.\u00a0<\/b>Podle toho, co je v\u00a0textu \u00a7 405 je kauza neodsouditeln\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Obh\u00e1jce Juraje V\u00e1clav\u00edka- z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e1 \u0159e\u010d<\/b><\/p>\n

J\u00e1 s\u00e1m zn\u00e1m t\u0159i verze katy\u0148sk\u00e9 trag\u00e9die:<\/p>\n

1) od rodi\u010d\u016f jsem se dov\u011bd\u011bl, \u017ee N\u011bmci tvrdili, \u017ee to ud\u011blali Rusov\u00e9,<\/p>\n

2) posl\u00e9ze jsem se dov\u00eddal, \u017ee to ud\u011blali N\u011bmci,<\/p>\n

3) po\u00a0r. 90 jsou zase za vin\u00edky ozna\u010dov\u00e1ni Rusov\u00e9,<\/p>\n

b\u016fhv\u00ed, co se bude tvrdit za dvacet let.<\/p>\n

Skute\u010dnost, \u017ee tam do\u0161lo k\u00a0zavra\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed n\u011bkolika des\u00edtek tis\u00edc\u016f lid\u00ed je dan\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Tud\u00ed\u017e verze t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se pachatel\u016f si odporuj\u00ed, ale v\u00a0debat\u011b nedo\u0161lo k\u00a0napln\u011bn\u00ed skutkov\u00e9 podstaty tr. \u010dinu podle zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9ho paragrafu, proto\u017ee nikdo z\u00a0ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch netvrdil, \u017ee se ten skutek nestal. Nikdo nic nezpochyb\u0148oval, nepop\u00edral, neschvaloval, to je velk\u00e1 le\u017e u\u017e od p\u0159\u00edpravn\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed. M\u016fj klient pouze vyj\u00e1d\u0159il n\u00e1zor na ty ud\u00e1losti a\u00a0pro ten m\u00e1 podporu z\u00a0ur\u010dit\u00fdch fakt\u016f. A\u00a0toto nelze pova\u017eovat za deliktn\u00ed.<\/p>\n

Svoboda slova \u2013 d\u00e1v\u00e1 prostor k\u00a0tomu, aby v\u00a0z\u00e1sad\u011b jak\u00e1koliv ot\u00e1zka mohla b\u00fdt p\u0159edm\u011btem ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 debaty.<\/p>\n

Z t\u011bchto d\u016fvod\u016f navrhuji, aby byl vynesen zpro\u0161\u0165uj\u00edc\u00ed rozsudek.<\/p>\n

Z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e1 slova ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch<\/b><\/p>\n

Vladim\u00edr Kapal \u2013 stru\u010dn\u00e9 z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e9 vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed:<\/b><\/p>\n

Cel\u00fd soud pova\u017euji za soud politick\u00fd!<\/p>\n

Dr.\u00a0Sk\u00e1la \u2013\u00a0z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e9 vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed:\u00a0<\/b>St\u00e1tn\u00ed\u00a0z\u00e1stupkyn\u011b \u0159ekla, \u017ee\u00a0p\u0159i tomto jedn\u00e1n\u00ed\u00a0nebyly p\u0159edlo\u017eeny \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 d\u016fkazy, kter\u00e9 by kauzu posunuly. To nen\u00ed pravda.\u00a0N\u00e1m bylo sice umo\u017en\u011bno p\u0159edn\u00e9st jen n\u011bkter\u00e9 d\u016fkazy, ale\u00a0jsou z\u00a0velmi seri\u00f3zn\u00edch zdroj\u016f.\u00a0Pro\u010d se trv\u00e1 na tom, \u017ee d\u016fkazy, kter\u00e9 jdou k\u00a0j\u00e1dru v\u011bci, nesm\u00ed b\u00fdt p\u0159edlo\u017eeny?\u00a0Pro\u010d je to takov\u00e9 tabu vyslechnout nap\u0159.\u00a0akademika, kter\u00fd pracoval s\u00a0prim\u00e1rn\u00edmi prameny?<\/p>\n

J<\/b>e pro n\u00e1s\u00a0<\/b>tedy\u00a0<\/b>z\u00e1vazn\u00e9\u00a0<\/b>to<\/b>, co eses\u00e1ck\u00fd plukovn\u00edk sepsal s\u00a0partou lid\u00ed, kte\u0159\u00ed mu to museli podepsat, aby se dostali dom\u016f?<\/b><\/p>\n

Zpochybnil n\u011bkdo brilantn\u00ed vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed Prof. Franti\u0161ka H\u00e1jka?<\/p>\n

(Sk\u00e1la mluvil i\u00a0o\u00a0dal\u0161\u00edch d\u016fkazech, kter\u00e9 soud odm\u00edtl)<\/p>\n

My jsme v\u00a0t\u00e9 rozhlasov\u00e9 debat\u011b cht\u011bli posunout pozn\u00e1n\u00ed d\u00e1l. To je \u00fakol v\u011bdy!<\/p>\n

Na\u0161\u00edm motivem nebylo zpochyb\u0148ovat \u010d\u00edsi\u00a0odpov\u011bdnost. Na\u0161\u00edm motivem bylo nab\u00eddnout ve\u0159ejnosti velmi zaj\u00edmav\u00e1 a\u00a0p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010div\u00e1 fakta a\u00a0argumenty dokl\u00e1daj\u00edc\u00ed nacistickou odpov\u011bdnost za v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00e9 zlo\u010diny genocidy.<\/p>\n

A jestli jsme trestn\u011b st\u00edh\u00e1ni za protinacistickou argumentaci, pane p\u0159edsedo, to je velmi v\u00e1\u017en\u00e1 v\u011bc!<\/b><\/p>\n

Juraj\u00a0V\u00e1clav\u00edk \u2013\u00a0z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e9 vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed<\/b>:<\/p>\n

J\u00e1 pova\u017euji tuto ob\u017ealobu za absurdn\u00ed. Je v\u00a0rozporu s\u00a0pr\u00e1vn\u00edm \u0159\u00e1dem t\u00e9to zem\u011b.<\/p>\n

Je zvl\u00e1\u0161tn\u00ed, \u017ee znalci, kte\u0159\u00ed vypracovali znaleck\u00e9 posudky, je zde nemohli obhajovat.<\/p>\n

J\u00e1 nec\u00edt\u00edm\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dnou svou\u00a0vinu.\u00a0Mysl\u00edm si, \u017ee jsme konali zcela spr\u00e1vn\u011b, zcela v\u00a0souladu s\u00a0ob\u010dansk\u00fdm \u0159\u00e1dem t\u00e9to zem\u011b.<\/p>\n

So\u0148a Zikmundov\u00e1\u00a0(jako ur\u010den\u00e1 osoba zastupuj\u00edc\u00ed pr\u00e1vnickou osobu Svobodn\u00e9 r\u00e1dio) se z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e9ho slova vzdala.\u00a0<\/b>P\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1m, \u017ee na po\u010d\u00e1tku soudn\u00edho jedn\u00e1n\u00ed (3.\u00a03.\u00a02023) se\u00a0ale\u00a0ke kauze\u00a0vyj\u00e1d\u0159ila v\u00a0kr\u00e1tk\u00e9m prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed. V\u00a0n\u011bm p\u0159ipomenula \u00fatok na redakci\u00a0francouzsk\u00e9ho \u010dasopisu\u00a0Charlie Hebdo a\u00a0n\u00e1slednou demonstraci p\u0159edn\u00edch evropsk\u00fdch politik\u016f v\u00a0Pa\u0159\u00ed\u017ei, kte\u0159\u00ed se manifesta\u010dn\u011b p\u0159ihl\u00e1sili k\u00a0obhajob\u011b pr\u00e1va na svobodu projevu.<\/p>\n

P\u0159est\u00e1vka 15 minut<\/b><\/p>\n

Lid\u00e9, kte\u0159\u00ed se neve\u0161li do soudn\u00ed s\u00edn\u011b a\u00a0\u010dekali na chodb\u011b, byli \u0161okovan\u00ed, kdy\u017e jsme jim \u0159ekli, \u017ee dokazovan\u00ed bylo skon\u010deno, z\u00e1v\u011bre\u010dn\u00e9 projevy vysloveny a\u00a0\u017ee po\u00a0p\u0159est\u00e1vce u\u017e bude ozn\u00e1men rozsudek.\"\"<\/p>\n

Vynesen\u00ed rozsudku jm\u00e9nem \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky<\/b><\/p>\n

jsme vyslechli ve stoje a\u00a0kameramani \u010cT zab\u00edrali na\u0161e tv\u00e1\u0159e<\/p>\n

Samosoudce Tom\u00e1\u0161 H\u00fcbner<\/b><\/p>\n

v rozsudku, kter\u00fdm ob\u017ealovan\u00e9 shledal vinn\u00fdmi z\u00a0trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu dle \u00a7 405 Tr. z\u00e1kon\u00edku v\u00a0podstat\u011b zopakoval ob\u017ealobu.<\/p>\n

Co se stalo v\u00a0Katyni, pova\u017euje soud za prok\u00e1zanou historickou skute\u010dnost, dokazov\u00e1n\u00ed u\u00a0soudu se proto soust\u0159edilo na to, co ob\u017ealovan\u00ed pronesli na z\u00e1znamu.<\/p>\n

Ne\u0161lo o\u00a0diskuzi. \u201eTo nebyla diskuze, byla to jasn\u00e1 propagandistick\u00e1 exhibice za hranic\u00ed z\u00e1kona, kter\u00e1 od za\u010d\u00e1tku do konce sm\u011b\u0159ovala pouze k\u00a0jednomu: aby poslucha\u010de, kter\u00fd bude m\u00edt tu sm\u016flu, \u017ee si relaci zapne, p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010dila o\u00a0tom, \u017ee v\u00a0Katyni se ani tak moc nestalo, a\u00a0pokud stalo, tak za v\u0161echno mohou N\u011bmci, proto\u017ee Sov\u011btsk\u00fd svaz p\u0159ece v\u00a0r\u00e1mci druh\u00e9 sv\u011btov\u00e9 v\u00e1lky ani jin\u00e9 \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00e9 zlo\u010diny nesp\u00e1chal.\u201c<\/p>\n

Dal\u0161\u00ed invektivy u\u017e jsem si nezapisovala.<\/p>\n

Rozsudek o\u00a0trestech\u00a0<\/b>byl zv\u00fd\u0161en oproti p\u016fvodn\u00edmu trestn\u00edmu p\u0159\u00edkazu na osm m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f s\u00a0podm\u00edne\u010dnou dobou na\u00a0p\u011bt let.\u00a0<\/b>Samosoudce to vysv\u011btlil t\u00edm, \u017ee u\u00a0ob\u017ealovan\u00fdch neprob\u011bhla sebereflexe, \u017ee neuzn\u00e1vaj\u00ed spole\u010denskou \u0161kodlivost sv\u00e9ho trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu, a\u00a0proto budou po\u00a0dobu p\u011bti let \u201epozorov\u00e1ni\u201c \u2026.<\/p>\n

V\u0161ichni ob\u017ealovan\u00ed se odvolali p\u0159\u00edmo do rozsudku<\/b>.<\/p>\n

Pak jsme pod dohledem ozbrojen\u00fdch policist\u016f vy\u0161li na chodbu a\u00a0v\u00a0hlou\u010dc\u00edch sd\u011blovali t\u011bm, co v\u00a0soudn\u00ed s\u00edni nebyli, \u010deho jsme byli sv\u011bdky.<\/p>\n

Pod\u011bkovala jsem obh\u00e1jc\u016fm za jejich profesionalitu a\u00a0state\u010dnost, rozlou\u010dila se s\u00a0ob\u017ealovan\u00fdmi a\u00a0\u0161la p\u011b\u0161ky dom\u016f.<\/p>\n

Slunce sv\u00edtilo,\u00a0ve vzduchu u\u017e bylo c\u00edtit p\u0159edja\u0159\u00ed, u\u00a0zadn\u00edho vchodu Stavovsk\u00e9ho divadla poku\u0159ovali kulis\u00e1ci, ale u\u017e to byla jin\u00e1 parta, ne\u017e ta, kterou jsem znala v\u00a0dob\u00e1ch, kdy jsem tam ukl\u00edzela coby NO (osoba nep\u0159\u00e1telsk\u00e1 k\u00a0re\u017eimu).\u00a0I tehdy prob\u00edhaly politick\u00e9 procesy, kam jsem jako ve\u0159ejnost chodila. Za protinacistickou argumentaci v\u0161ak nikdo st\u00edhan\u00fd nebyl.<\/p>\n

Lenka Proch\u00e1zkov\u00e1<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

____________________________<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Komentovan\u00e9 z\u00e1pisky ze soudn\u00edho procesu \u201eDr. Sk\u00e1la a\u00a0spol.\u201c, jeho\u017e jsem se coby ve\u0159ejnost z\u00fa\u010dastnila. P\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvek…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":24397,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[33,4385,520,324,48],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24396"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24396\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/24397"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}