{"id":116648,"date":"2026-09-24T00:31:41","date_gmt":"2026-09-23T22:31:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=116648"},"modified":"2026-09-23T18:44:02","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T16:44:02","slug":"americky-pruzkum-ukazuje-ze-32-demokratu-je-pro-atentat-na-trumpa-59-pro-vojensky-prevrat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2026\/09\/24\/americky-pruzkum-ukazuje-ze-32-demokratu-je-pro-atentat-na-trumpa-59-pro-vojensky-prevrat\/","title":{"rendered":"Americk\u00fd pr\u016fzkum ukazuje, \u017ee 32 % demokrat\u016f je pro atent\u00e1t na Trumpa, 59 % pro vojensk\u00fd p\u0159evrat"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Politick\u00e1 levice je zast\u00e1ncem totalitarismu a vra\u017ed. To je st\u00e1le z\u0159eteln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed \u2013 naposledy v pr\u016fzkumu, kter\u00fd provedlo levicov\u011b orientovan\u00e9 \u201eCenter for Strategy Politics\u201c ve spolupr\u00e1ci se stejn\u011b levicov\u00fdmi \u201eLiberal Currents\u201c. Podle pr\u016fzkumu velk\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st takzvan\u00fdch \u201edemokrat\u016f\u201c, co\u017e v Americe znamen\u00e1 levicov\u00e9 socialisty, up\u0159ednost\u0148uje n\u00e1siln\u00e9 svr\u017een\u00ed vl\u00e1dy. A\u0165 se pod\u00edv\u00e1te kamkoli, levi\u010d\u00e1ci nemaj\u00ed o demokracii z\u00e1jem; m\u00edsto toho n\u00e1sleduj\u00ed sv\u00e9 historick\u00e9 vzory.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Ned\u00e1vn\u00fd pr\u016fzkum mezi \u201edemokratick\u00fdmi\u201c voli\u010di v USA odhaluje problematick\u00e9 ch\u00e1p\u00e1n\u00ed demokracie americkou levic\u00ed. T\u0159icet jedna procent respondent\u016f uvedlo, \u017ee by na zpr\u00e1vu o atent\u00e1tu na Donalda Trumpa reagovalo pozitivn\u011b. V\u00fdsledek je je\u0161t\u011b v\u00fdrazn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed v p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b hypotetick\u00e9ho vojensk\u00e9ho p\u0159evratu: 59 procent se p\u0159\u00edzniv\u011b d\u00edvalo na my\u0161lenku, \u017ee vojen\u0161t\u00ed v\u016fdci sesad\u00ed Trumpa a p\u0159evezmou kontrolu nad Spojen\u00fdmi st\u00e1ty. Za zm\u00ednku stoj\u00ed i to, kdo pr\u016fzkum zadal: \u010d\u00edsla poch\u00e1zej\u00ed z explicitn\u011b progresivn\u00edch politick\u00fdch kruh\u016f.<\/span><\/p>\n

Levicov\u00fd institut pro pr\u016fzkumy ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho m\u00edn\u011bn\u00ed odhaluje levicovou nen\u00e1vist<\/span><\/h3>\n

Studii provedlo Americk\u00e9 centrum pro strategickou politiku (CSP). Organizace se nepopisuje jako nestranick\u00fd institut pro pr\u016fzkumy ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho m\u00edn\u011bn\u00ed, ale v\u00fdslovn\u011b jako sou\u010d\u00e1st \u201eprogresivn\u00ed komunity\u201c. Jej\u00edm c\u00edlem je poskytovat progresivn\u00edm politik\u016fm data a anal\u00fdzy. Celost\u00e1tn\u00ed pr\u016fzkum si objednala liber\u00e1ln\u00ed publikace \u201eLiberal Currents\u201c.<\/span><\/p>\n

Autor Liber\u00e1ln\u00edch proud\u016f Chance Phillips v dob\u011b vyd\u00e1n\u00ed vysv\u011btlil, \u017ee ve spolupr\u00e1ci s Centrem pro strategickou politiku sestavil pr\u016fzkum mezi demokratick\u00fdmi voli\u010di. V\u00fdsledky byly zve\u0159ejn\u011bny 21. z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed 2026.<\/span><\/p>\n

CSP provedla pr\u016fzkum mezi celkem 683 demokratick\u00fdmi voli\u010di ve Spojen\u00fdch st\u00e1tech. Pr\u016fzkum prob\u011bhl 3. z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed a od 8. do 10. z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed 2026. \u00da\u010dastn\u00edci byli osloveni prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm SMS zpr\u00e1v na web a online panel\u016f. Jednotlivci mimo c\u00edlovou skupinu byli vylou\u010deni na z\u00e1klad\u011b sv\u00e9ho sebehodnocen\u00ed a pokud mo\u017eno na z\u00e1klad\u011b \u00fadaj\u016f o voli\u010d\u00edch.<\/span><\/p>\n

Vzorek byl v\u00e1\u017een podle v\u011bku, etnick\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161nosti a pohlav\u00ed. Institut uv\u00e1d\u00ed statistickou odchylku plus\/minus 3,75 procentn\u00edho bodu.<\/span><\/p>\n

Na co p\u0159esn\u011b se ptali?<\/span><\/h3>\n

Jak je pro levi\u010d\u00e1ky typick\u00e9, chyb\u011bla jim odvaha mluvit otev\u0159en\u011b \u2013 pr\u016fzkum fungoval na z\u00e1klad\u011b eufemism\u016f: \u00da\u010dastn\u00edci nebyli p\u0159\u00edmo dot\u00e1z\u00e1ni: \u201ePodporujete atent\u00e1t na Donalda Trumpa?\u201c M\u00edsto toho v\u011bdci prezentovali r\u016fzn\u00e9 hypotetick\u00e9 zpravodajsk\u00e9 zpr\u00e1vy a cht\u011bli v\u011bd\u011bt, jak by se respondenti c\u00edtili, kdyby si je p\u0159e\u010detli n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed r\u00e1no.<\/span><\/p>\n

Jedna z t\u011bchto zpr\u00e1v v podstat\u011b uv\u00e1d\u011bla, \u017ee prezident Donald Trump byl zavra\u017ed\u011bn p\u0159i projevu na shrom\u00e1\u017ed\u011bn\u00ed. Dvacet t\u0159i procent reagovalo \u201evelmi pozitivn\u011b\u201c a dal\u0161\u00edch osm procent \u201esp\u00ed\u0161e pozitivn\u011b\u201c. Celkov\u011b na tento sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159 reagovalo pozitivn\u011b 31 procent.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dvacet p\u011bt procent uvedlo, \u017ee se nec\u00edt\u00ed ani pozitivn\u011b, ani negativn\u011b. Jeden\u00e1ct procent reagovalo \u201esp\u00ed\u0161e negativn\u011b\u201c a 32 procent \u201evelmi negativn\u011b\u201c. Celkov\u011b 43 procent vn\u00edmalo atent\u00e1t na Trumpa negativn\u011b. Nesouhlas byl tedy v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed ne\u017e souhlas \u2013 nicm\u00e9n\u011b t\u00e9m\u011b\u0159 t\u0159etina dot\u00e1zan\u00fdch demokratick\u00fdch voli\u010d\u016f reagovala na hypotetickou zpr\u00e1vu o politick\u00e9m atent\u00e1tu pozitivn\u011b.<\/span><\/p>\n

Pod\u00edl byl obzvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b vysok\u00fd mezi \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edky, kte\u0159\u00ed se ideologicky identifikovali jako socialist\u00e9 nebo progresivist\u00e9: 39 procent z nich reagovalo na zpr\u00e1vu o Trumpov\u011b atent\u00e1tu pozitivn\u011b. Mezi respondenty, kte\u0159\u00ed se ozna\u010dili za \u201eprobuzen\u00e9\u201c, to bylo 38 procent.<\/span><\/p>\n

V\u011bt\u0161ina levi\u010d\u00e1k\u016f reagovala na vojensk\u00fd p\u0159evrat pozitivn\u011b.<\/span><\/h3>\n

V\u00fdsledek je je\u0161t\u011b v\u00fdrazn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed v druh\u00e9m sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159i. \u00da\u010dastn\u00edci byli po\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1ni, aby si p\u0159edstavili, \u017ee by se r\u00e1no dozv\u011bd\u011bli, \u017ee skupina americk\u00fdch vojensk\u00fdch v\u016fdc\u016f odvolala Trumpa z funkce, \u201eaby ochr\u00e1nila \u00dastavu\u201c, a n\u00e1sledn\u011b se zmocnila samotn\u00fdch Spojen\u00fdch st\u00e1t\u016f.<\/span><\/p>\n

43 procent reagovalo \u201evelmi pozitivn\u011b\u201c a dal\u0161\u00edch 16 procent \u201esp\u00ed\u0161e pozitivn\u011b\u201c. Celkov\u011b 59 procent dot\u00e1zan\u00fdch demokratick\u00fdch voli\u010d\u016f vn\u00edmalo takov\u00fd v\u00fdvoj pozitivn\u011b. Pouze 28 procent reagovalo negativn\u011b a 13 procent bylo neutr\u00e1ln\u00edch.<\/span><\/p>\n

Formulace ot\u00e1zky je v\u00fdznamn\u00e1. Sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159 byl v\u00fdslovn\u011b pops\u00e1n jako sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159 s c\u00edlem \u201eochr\u00e1nit\u201c \u00fastavu. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 ot\u00e1zka nenech\u00e1vala \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 pochybnosti o tom, co by se v praxi stalo: vojen\u0161t\u00ed v\u016fdci by sesadili zvolen\u00e9ho prezidenta a sami by se zmocnili vl\u00e1dy nad zem\u00ed.<\/span><\/p>\n

Dokonce i Trumpova p\u0159irozen\u00e1 smrt byla p\u0159ijata p\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b pozitivn\u011b<\/span><\/h3>\n

Dal\u0161\u00ed sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159 zahrnoval Trumpovo \u00famrt\u00ed ve sp\u00e1nku p\u0159es noc. \u010cty\u0159icet p\u011bt procent respondent\u016f na to reagovalo \u201evelmi pozitivn\u011b\u201c a dal\u0161\u00edch deset procent \u201esp\u00ed\u0161e pozitivn\u011b\u201c. Celkov\u011b by na takovou zpr\u00e1vu reagovalo pozitivn\u011b 56 procent. Pouze 16 procent reagovalo negativn\u011b a 28 procent bylo neutr\u00e1ln\u00edch.<\/span><\/p>\n

Jak se o\u010dek\u00e1valo, v\u00fdrazn\u011b v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161ina respondent\u016f podpo\u0159ila \u00fastavn\u00ed mo\u017enosti odvol\u00e1n\u00ed Trumpa z funkce. Osmdes\u00e1t \u0161est procent reagovalo pozitivn\u011b na sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159 odvol\u00e1n\u00ed z funkce po impeachmentu a odsouzen\u00ed Kongresem. Pokud \u0161lo o uplatn\u011bn\u00ed 25. dodatku \u00dastavy, tj. odvol\u00e1n\u00ed z d\u016fvodu prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed nezp\u016fsobilosti kabinetn\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161inou, toto \u010d\u00edslo dos\u00e1hlo 84 procent.<\/span><\/p>\n

Autor studie pop\u00edr\u00e1 ochotu pou\u017e\u00edt n\u00e1sil\u00ed<\/span><\/h3>\n

Organizace Liberal Currents uvedla, \u017ee chce zjistit sou\u010dasn\u00e9 politick\u00e9 n\u00e1zory z\u00e1kladny Demokratick\u00e9 strany. Pr\u016fzkum m\u011bl podstatn\u011b \u0161ir\u0161\u00ed z\u00e1b\u011br ne\u017e ot\u00e1zky t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se Trumpa, o kter\u00fdch se nyn\u00ed diskutuje. Mimo jin\u00e9 se ptal na potenci\u00e1ln\u00ed demokratick\u00e9 prezidentsk\u00e9 kandid\u00e1ty pro rok 2028, filibuster v Sen\u00e1tu, imigraci, vl\u00e1dn\u00ed kontrolu nad ur\u010dit\u00fdmi ekonomick\u00fdmi odv\u011btv\u00edmi a mo\u017en\u00e1 trestn\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed proti \u010dlen\u016fm Trumpovy administrativy.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ot\u00e1zky t\u00fdkaj\u00edc\u00ed se Trumpova p\u0159ed\u010dasn\u00e9ho odchodu z funkce byly tedy pouze jednou \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed 51str\u00e1nkov\u00e9ho pr\u016fzkumu.<\/span><\/p>\n

S\u00e1m autor vyvodil ze sc\u00e9n\u00e1\u0159e atent\u00e1tu opatrn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed z\u00e1v\u011br. Proto\u017ee 43 procent respondent\u016f reagovalo na atent\u00e1t negativn\u011b ne\u017e pozitivn\u011b, Phillips napsal, \u017ee demokrat\u00e9 \u201ep\u0159ev\u00e1\u017en\u011b\u201c nebyli pro politick\u00e9 n\u00e1sil\u00ed. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 poznamenal, \u017ee \u00fa\u010dastn\u00edci reagovali pozitivn\u011b prakticky na v\u0161echny mo\u017enosti Trumpova brzk\u00e9ho odchodu z funkce \u2013 v\u00fdslovn\u011b v\u010detn\u011b vojensk\u00e9ho p\u0159evzet\u00ed moci.<\/span><\/p>\n

Zdroj: <\/span>Pr\u016fzkum s kompletn\u00edmi ot\u00e1zkami a odpov\u011b\u010fmi<\/span><\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Politick\u00e1 levice je zast\u00e1ncem totalitarismu a vra\u017ed. To je st\u00e1le z\u0159eteln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed \u2013 naposledy v pr\u016fzkumu,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":116649,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[468,1310,1312,620,452,37],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116648"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=116648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116648\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/116649"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=116648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=116648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=116648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}