{"id":104211,"date":"2026-04-10T05:31:32","date_gmt":"2026-04-10T03:31:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=104211"},"modified":"2026-04-10T05:31:32","modified_gmt":"2026-04-10T03:31:32","slug":"prvni-text-o-smyslu-rubriky-nove-ceskoslovensko","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2026\/04\/10\/prvni-text-o-smyslu-rubriky-nove-ceskoslovensko\/","title":{"rendered":"Prvn\u00ed text o smyslu rubriky Nov\u00e9 \u010ceskoSlovensko…"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

….kter\u00fd je z\u00e1rove\u0148 st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u00ed v\u00fdzvou k\u00a0ob\u010dan\u016fm obou republik.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

V\u011bnov\u00e1no pam\u00e1tce historika Dr. Jana Tesa\u0159e, kter\u00fd cel\u00fd sv\u016fj \u017eivot v\u011bnoval boji proti v\u0161em form\u00e1m totality, za demokracii a pr\u00e1vo, za my\u0161lenku \u010desko-slovensk\u00e9 vz\u00e1jemnosti a jej\u00ed st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u00ed formy na z\u00e1klad\u011b pln\u00e9 rovnopr\u00e1vnosti obou n\u00e1rod\u016f.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201e\u010ceskoslovenstv\u00ed je pro mne kulturn\u011b n\u011bco vy\u0161\u0161\u00edho ne\u017eli jen \u010de\u0161stv\u00ed nebo slovenstv\u00ed. Tu u\u017e vych\u00e1z\u00edme ze sv\u00e9 osudov\u00e9 malosti.\u201c
\n<\/em>Edvard Bene\u0161, 1947<\/p>\n

\u201eZv\u00ed\u0165az\u00edme, ak budeme my \u010cesi a Slov\u00e1ci, v\u017edycky po boku. Ke\u010f sa podar\u00ed niekomu n\u00e1s rozdvoji\u0165, potom bude s\u00a0nami zle. V\u00a0jednote je sila. Prvou z\u00e1sadou n\u00e1\u0161ho boja je jednota a svornos\u0165. To si, bratia, pam\u00e4tajme.\u201c
\n<\/em>Milan Rastislav \u0160tef\u00e1nik<\/p>\n

Politick\u00e1 vize \u010cSMF<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Rubrika\u00a0Za<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0novou \u010cesko-Slovenskou st\u00e1tnost<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0obsahuje \u00favahy, anal\u00fdzy a koment\u00e1\u0159e, kter\u00e9 se vztahuj\u00ed na z\u00e1sadn\u00ed ot\u00e1zky \u010desko-slovensk\u00fdch vztah\u016f.\u00a0\u010cSMF z\u00e1rove\u0148 pova\u017euje za sv\u016fj prvo\u0159ad\u00fd \u00fakol usilovat o nov\u00e9 kroky k\u00a0upevn\u011bn\u00ed historick\u00fdch \u010desko-slovensk\u00fdch vazeb.<\/strong>\u00a0V\u00a0kontextu t\u011bsn\u00e9 kulturn\u00ed vz\u00e1jemnost obou n\u00e1rod\u016f, aktu\u00e1ln\u00ed situace v\u00a0Evrop\u011b a ve sv\u011bt\u011b i dosavadn\u00ed zku\u0161enosti s\u00a0politick\u00fdm i ekonomick\u00fdm v\u00fdvojem obou republik po rozd\u011blen\u00ed \u010cSFR pova\u017eujeme za n\u00e1\u0161 \u00fakol nab\u00eddnout\u00a0vizi obnovy \u010desko-slovensk\u00e9 st\u00e1tnosti na z\u00e1klad\u011b rovn\u00fdch st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u00edch vztah\u016f obou republik \u2013 Slovensk\u00e9 a \u010cesk\u00e9<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

Polistopadov\u00e1\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e1 a Slovensk\u00e1 Federativn\u00ed Republika<\/em><\/strong><\/h3>\n

Celkov\u00fd\u00a0v\u00fdvoj v\u00a0\u010cSFR po listopadu 1989 byl ve znamen\u00ed politick\u00e9ho diletantstv\u00ed, osobn\u00edho prosp\u011bch\u00e1\u0159stv\u00ed, do nebe \u017ealuj\u00edc\u00edho ahistorismu a zejm\u00e9na na \u010desk\u00e9 stran\u011b zcela nekritick\u00e9ho \u201ez\u00e1padnictv\u00ed\u201c<\/em>. \u010cesk\u00e1 strana vn\u00edmala diferencovan\u011bj\u0161\u00ed postoj k\u00a0minulosti a rezervovan\u011bj\u0161\u00ed postoj k\u00a0pra\u017esk\u00e9mu opojen\u00ed novou modlou \u201esvat\u00e9ho trhu\u201c na slovensk\u00e9 stran\u011b jako p\u0159\u00edt\u011b\u017e a brzdu na cest\u011b do rajsk\u00e9 budoucnosti v\u00a0\u201ezasl\u00edben\u00e9 Evrop\u011b\u201c. Byly ignorov\u00e1ny varovn\u00e9 hlasy t\u011bch, kte\u0159\u00ed si byli v\u011bdomi nad\u010dasov\u00e9ho, geopolitick\u00e9ho v\u00fdznamu \u010cesko-Slovensk\u00e9 st\u00e1tnosti, uv\u011bdomovali si historickou \u0161anci na transformaci dosavadn\u00ed Federace do nov\u00e9 autentick\u00e9 podoby a varovali, \u017ee Havl\u016fv narativ o \u201en\u00e1vratu do Evropy (p\u0159es N\u011bmecko)\u201c implikoval v\u00fdlu\u010dn\u011b Evropu z\u00e1padn\u00ed a tot\u00e1ln\u00ed pod\u0159\u00edzen\u00ed pravidl\u016fm hry, kter\u00e9 ur\u010d\u00ed jej\u00ed mocensk\u00e9 a vlivov\u00e9 struktury. Tyto hlasy byly odsunuty na politickou periferii. Jejich progn\u00f3zy, \u017ee tato cesta povede k\u00a0rozbit\u00ed Federace a n\u00e1sledn\u00e9mu v\u00fdprodeji obou republik, se bohu\u017eel naplnily.<\/p>\n

Celkov\u00e1 ne\u0161\u0165astn\u00e1, amat\u00e9rsky veden\u00e1 \u010desko-slovensk\u00e1 \u201ediskuze\u201c o budouc\u00edm uspo\u0159\u00e1d\u00e1n\u00ed spole\u010dn\u00e9ho st\u00e1tu (tzv. poml\u010dkov\u00e1 v\u00e1lka; n\u011bkter\u00e9 bizarn\u00ed n\u00e1vrhy st\u00e1tn\u00ed symboliky, kter\u00e9 zazn\u011bly z\u00a0Pra\u017esk\u00e9ho hradu bez odborn\u00e9ho fundamentu, zato s\u00a0od\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00edm, \u017ee navrhovan\u00fd st\u00e1tn\u00ed znak je \u201ehezk\u00fd\u201c a podobn\u011b) prozradila\u00a0nevyzr\u00e1lost politick\u00e9 kultury, zejm\u00e9na v\u00a0ot\u00e1zk\u00e1ch st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u00edch<\/em><\/strong>. Tento deficit m\u011bl historick\u00e9 ko\u0159eny, kter\u00e9 se pokus\u00edme stru\u010dn\u011b p\u0159ipomenout n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00edmi body.<\/p>\n

Zem\u011b Koruny \u010desk\u00e9: od ran\u00e9ho st\u0159edov\u011bku po rok 1619<\/strong><\/h3>\n

Ve st\u0159edov\u011bku a po\u010d\u00e1tkem novov\u011bku m\u011bly \u010cechy a jejich korunn\u00ed zem\u011b dokonce n\u00e1skok v\u00a0procesu konstituce st\u00e1tn\u00ed jednoty p\u0159ed v\u011bt\u0161inou budouc\u00edch evropsk\u00fdch st\u00e1t\u016f \u2013 a sice na z\u00e1klad\u011b federativn\u00edch vazeb mezi \u010cechami, Moravou, Slezskem a ob\u011bma Lu\u017eicemi (\u010cesk\u00e1 konfederace<\/em><\/strong>). Tento historick\u00fd proces byl zastaven\u00a0osudnou a ostudnou strategi\u00ed \u201epolitick\u00e9 elity\u201c<\/em>\u00a0roku 1620.\u00a0T\u00edm bylo znemo\u017en\u011bno konstitu\u010dn\u00ed zr\u00e1n\u00ed Konfederace v\u00a0r\u00e1mci autentick\u00e9ho v\u00fdvoje svobodn\u00e9ho subjektu evropsk\u00fdch d\u011bjin a\u017e do jej\u00ed modern\u00ed f\u00e1ze.<\/em><\/p>\n

1918 a \u010cSR<\/strong><\/h3>\n

\u0160ance na obnovu n\u00e1rodn\u00ed samostatnosti a st\u00e1tn\u00ed existence nastala v\u00a0roce 1918, tentokr\u00e1te ve spojen\u00ed se Slovenskem a Podkarpatskou Rus\u00ed. Kdo na deficity prvn\u00ed \u010cSR \u017eehr\u00e1, mus\u00ed si uv\u011bdomit objektivn\u00ed podm\u00ednky jej\u00edho vzniku:\u00a0\u010cesk\u00e9 zem\u011b byly vystaveny nejen v\u00fdzv\u011b k<\/em>\u00a0p\u0159ekon\u00e1n\u00ed t\u0159istalet\u00e9 negace st\u00e1totvorn\u00e9ho procesu Koruny<\/em>.\u00a0Z\u00e1rove\u0148 ale do jej\u00ed modern\u00ed konstituce nam\u00edsto obou Lu\u017eic bylo integrov\u00e1no Slovensko a Podkarpatsk\u00e1 Rus. Takto byl rok 1918 \u010deskou spole\u010dnost\u00ed v\u011bt\u0161inov\u011b ch\u00e1p\u00e1n, co\u017e je v\u00a0kontextu doby zcela pochopiteln\u00e9.\u00a0<\/em>V t\u00e9to souvislosti je nutn\u00e9 si uv\u011bdomit z\u00e1sadn\u00ed mezin\u00e1rodn\u011bpolitick\u00fd probl\u00e9m nov\u00e9 samostatnosti.\u00a0Na stran\u011b jedn\u00e9 bylo nutn\u00e9 zd\u016fraznit<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0kontinuitu mezi \u010deskou st\u00e1tnost\u00ed p\u0159ed rokem 1620 a prok\u00e1zat jej\u00ed existenc<\/em><\/strong>i.\u00a0Na stran\u011b druh\u00e9 politicky a st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u011b reagovat na spojen\u00ed s\u00a0nov\u00fdmi zem\u011bmi \u2013 Slovenskem a Podkarpatskou Rus\u00ed, kter\u00e9 v\u0161ak nevykazovaly \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 znaky pr\u00e1vn\u00ed subjektivity.<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Objektivn\u011b vid\u011bno \u2013 muselo b\u00fdt zr\u00e1n\u00ed st\u00e1tnosti \u010cech\u016f, Slov\u00e1k\u016f, Rus\u00edn\u016f a v\u0161ech n\u00e1rodnost\u00ed na st\u00e1tn\u00edm \u00fazem\u00ed zalo\u017eeno na pozvoln\u00e9m, evolu\u010dn\u00edm procesu federalizace \u010ceskoslovenska.<\/p>\n

P\u0159esto znamenala\u00a0\u010ceskoslovensk\u00e1 republika<\/strong>\u00a0prvn\u00ed f\u00e1zi\u00a0realizace historick\u00e9 \u0161ance<\/strong>, kterou na\u0161im t\u0159em n\u00e1rod\u016fm nab\u00eddl konec I. Sv\u011btov\u00e9 v\u00e1lky. V\u00a0tomto kontextu nen\u00ed mo\u017en\u00e9 analyzovat konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed probl\u00e9my a jejich d\u016fvody, se kter\u00fdmi byl tehdej\u0161\u00ed \u010deskoslovensk\u00fd st\u00e1t konfrontov\u00e1n \u2013 o nich v\u00a0jin\u00e9 stati. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b ponech\u00e1me-li z\u00e1sadn\u00ed, destruktivn\u00ed tzv. sudeton\u011bmeck\u00fd probl\u00e9m v\u00a0jeho mezin\u00e1rodn\u00edch souvislostech stranou, lze p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dat, \u017ee bez vn\u011bj\u0161\u00edho z\u00e1sahu, jak\u00fdm byla n\u011bmeck\u00e1 okupace, v\u00e1lka a n\u00e1sledn\u00fd n\u00e1stup v\u00e1lky studen\u00e9, by se\u00a0politick\u00e9 konflikty ohledn\u011b vnit\u0159n\u00edch vztah\u016f mezi n\u00e1rody a n\u00e1rodnostmi odehr\u00e1valy v\u00a0konstitu\u010dn\u00edm r\u00e1mci pr\u00e1vn\u00edho a demokratick\u00e9ho st\u00e1tu<\/em>, v\u00a0demokratick\u00fdch podm\u00ednk\u00e1ch \u010ceskoslovensk\u00e9 republiky a m\u011bly tud\u00ed\u017e z\u00e1sadn\u00ed p\u0159edpoklad pro positivn\u00ed \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed. Vzhledem k\u00a0ekonomick\u00e9mu potenci\u00e1lu, demokratick\u00e9mu charakteru st\u00e1tu a mezin\u00e1rodn\u00ed presti\u017ei \u010cSR by s\u00a0nejv\u011bt\u0161\u00ed pravd\u011bpodobnost\u00ed vy\u00fastily ve\u00a0st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u00ed konstrukci t\u0159\u00ed federativn\u00edch subjekt\u016f<\/em><\/strong>. V\u00e1lka hitlerovsk\u00e9ho N\u011bmecka a pov\u00e1le\u010dn\u00fd syst\u00e9m dvou blok\u016f v\u0161ak tuto \u0161anci p\u0159ekazily.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Realita dne\u0161ka<\/strong><\/h3>\n

\u010cSMF je p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010deno o\u00a0hlubok\u00e9m smyslu \u010desko-slovensk\u00e9ho st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u00edho spojen\u00ed<\/em>. A vzhledem k\u00a0turbulenci nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed doby a rizik\u016fm budouc\u00edho v\u00fdvoje dokonce o jeho nutnosti.\u00a0Dodnes je jm\u00e9no\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong>><\/strong>\u010ceskoslovensko<\/strong><<\/strong>\u00a0vizitkou, za kterou se v\u00a0Evrop\u011b a ve sv\u011bt\u011b nemus\u00edme styd\u011bt.<\/strong>\u00a0Na m\u00edst\u011b je pochybnost, zda se t\u00edmt\u00e9\u017e budou moci pochlubit i oba samostatn\u00e9 st\u00e1ty. \u017de mezi Slov\u00e1ky a \u010cechy existuje pevn\u00e9 kulturn\u00ed spojen\u00ed i modern\u00ed historick\u00e1 zku\u0161enost, \u017ee i po 33 letech st\u00e1tn\u00edho rozd\u011blen\u00ed existuje siln\u00e1 forma vz\u00e1jemnosti, je evidentn\u00ed fakt.\u00a0A je d\u011bsiv\u00e9, jak snadno jsme se spole\u010dn\u00e9ho st\u00e1tu vzdali, a jak za\u017eit\u00e9 jsou my\u0161lenkov\u00e9 stereotypy na\u0161\u00ed spole\u010dn\u00e9 politick\u00e9 (ne)kultury, zalo\u017een\u00e9 na pasivn\u00edm p\u0159\u00edstupu k\u00a0d\u011bjin\u00e1m.<\/strong>\u00a0Tato pasivita je v\u00a0p\u0159\u00edm\u00e9m rozporu se zakladateli na\u0161\u00ed modern\u00ed st\u00e1tnosti, na kter\u00e9 se tak r\u00e1di odvol\u00e1v\u00e1me<\/em>\u00a0(dlu\u017eno dodat, \u017ee s\u00a0p\u0159ib\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00edm politick\u00fdm a mor\u00e1ln\u00edm \u00fapadkem pro jistotu se st\u00e1le z\u0159eteln\u011bj\u0161\u00ed zdr\u017eenlivost\u00ed).<\/p>\n

Princip rovnov\u00e1hy<\/strong><\/h3>\n

\u010ceskoslovensko nebyl omyl d\u011bjin<\/em>, jak se sna\u017eili a sna\u017e\u00ed sugerovat kruhy z\u00a0n\u011bmeck\u00e9ho prost\u0159ed\u00ed, ment\u00e1ln\u011b spojen\u00e9 s\u00a0dobou 1933 \u2013 1945.\u00a0Tito lid\u00e9 nemohli m\u00edt probl\u00e9m s\u00a0\u010ceskoslovenskem jako domovsk\u00fdm st\u00e1tem, kter\u00fd jim zaru\u010doval \u00fastavn\u00ed svobody a kulturn\u00ed autonomii, o jak\u00e9 mohli jejich soukmenovci v\u00a0nacistick\u00e9 \u0158\u00ed\u0161i jen sn\u00edt. Jejich zloba m\u011bla ko\u0159eny v\u00a0ment\u00e1ln\u00edm deficitu lidskosti, v\u00a0n\u011bmecky \u0161ovinistick\u00e9m, ahistorick\u00e9m vn\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed nov\u011b nabyt\u00e9 st\u00e1tn\u00ed suverenity zem\u00ed, do kter\u00fdch v\u00a0dob\u011b st\u0159edov\u011bku a pozd\u011bji v\u00a0r\u00e1mci st\u011bhov\u00e1n\u00ed uvnit\u0159 Habsbursk\u00e9 monarchie p\u0159ich\u00e1zeli jako kvalifikovan\u00ed p\u0159ist\u011bhovalci. Zasko\u010dil je v\u00fdvoj, kter\u00fd p\u0159inesl ztr\u00e1tu politick\u00e9 exkluzivity a privilegovan\u00e9ho spole\u010densk\u00e9ho postaven\u00ed. Fakticky se jednalo o jejich probl\u00e9m s\u00a0\u010deskoslovenskou demokraci\u00ed, kter\u00e1 nacistick\u00e9 \u0158\u00ed\u0161i a\u017e do posledku vzdorovala<\/em>.<\/strong>\u00a0A je d\u011bsiv\u00e9, \u017ee toto totalitn\u00ed, \u0161ovinistick\u00e9 a zcela ahistorick\u00e9 politizov\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159ebrali mnoz\u00ed \u201ena\u0161i\u201c polistopadov\u00ed politici a \u201eintelektu\u00e1lov\u00e9\u201c. Zde nejde o hospodsk\u00e9 \u017evan\u011bn\u00ed, ale o\u00a0z\u00e1sadn\u00ed element \u010desk\u00e9 st\u00e1tn\u00ed politick\u00e9 kultury<\/strong>.<\/p>\n

\u010ceskoslovensko<\/strong>\u00a0byl smyslupln\u00fd a pro v\u0161echny demokraticky sm\u00fd\u0161lej\u00edc\u00ed n\u00e1rodnostn\u00ed skupiny\u00a0otev\u0159en\u00fd projekt budoucnosti<\/em><\/strong>, kter\u00fd pot\u0159eboval\u00a0\u201a\u010das a trp\u011blivou pr\u00e1ci\u2018<\/em>\u00a0(T.G.Masaryk), aby doc\u00edlil\u00a0vnit\u0159n\u00ed stabilitu na principu rovnov\u00e1\u017en\u00fdch vztah\u016f<\/em><\/strong>.<\/p>\n

\u010cSMF vyz\u00fdv\u00e1 v\u0161echny n\u00e1rodn\u00ed demokratick\u00e9 s\u00edly k\u00a0\u00fasil\u00ed o realizaci t\u00e9to historick\u00e9 v\u00fdzvy.<\/strong><\/h3>\n

V t\u00e9to souvislosti z\u00e1sadn\u00ed pozn\u00e1mka.<\/p>\n

\u010cSMF v\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nezam\u00fd\u0161l\u00ed 1.\u00a0\u010cS republiku idealizovat. Jej\u00ed re\u00e1ln\u00e1 existence se musela pot\u00fdkat jak s\u00a0hospod\u00e1\u0159skou kriz\u00ed zp\u016fsobenou krizov\u00fdm kapitalistick\u00fdm syst\u00e9mem a jeho soci\u00e1ln\u00edmi dopady, tak i s\u00a0probl\u00e9my n\u00e1rodnostn\u00edmi. K\u00a0tomu v\u0161emu se p\u0159idal stranick\u00fd egoismus, kter\u00fd \u010dasto up\u0159ednost\u0148oval osobn\u00ed nebo parci\u00e1ln\u00ed z\u00e1jmy p\u0159ed prosp\u011bchem celku. Tento stav v\u0161ak v\u00a0r\u016fzn\u00e9 intenzit\u011b postihl celou Evropu a tedy i ty multin\u00e1rodn\u00ed st\u00e1ty, kter\u00e9 ale na rozd\u00edl od \u010ceskoslovenska dodnes existuj\u00ed. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b jednu skute\u010dnost nelze p\u0159i v\u0161\u00ed opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00e9 kritice pom\u011br\u016f v\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b opomenout:\u00a0\u010ceskoslovensk\u00e1 st\u00e1tnost, v\u00a0t\u00e9 dob\u011b jakkoliv nedokonal\u00e1, byl spole\u010dn\u00fd projekt na\u0161ich p\u0159edk\u016f zalo\u017een\u00fd na z\u00e1sad\u00e1ch humanity, demokracie a pr\u00e1va.<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Vych\u00e1zel z\u00a0\u010desko-slovensk\u00e9ho obrodn\u00e9ho procesu 19.\u00a0stolet\u00ed, kter\u00fd\u00a0slovanstv\u00ed spojil s\u00a0v\u0161elidsk\u00fdmi ide\u00e1ly<\/em>. Tato podm\u00ednka smyslupln\u00e9 existence v\u00a0d\u011bjin\u00e1ch se automaticky musela dostat do ideologick\u00e9ho a n\u00e1sledn\u011b i existen\u010dn\u00edho konfliktu s\u00a0mytologick\u00fdm narrativem z\u00e1padn\u00edho souseda, kter\u00fd ch\u00e1pal n\u00e1rodn\u00ed existenci jako exkluzivn\u00ed spole\u010denstv\u00ed \u201ap\u016fdy a krve\u2018 (\u201aBlut und Boden\u2018), nad\u0159azen\u00e9 ostatn\u00edm n\u00e1rod\u016fm.<\/p>\n

Vize spole\u010dn\u00e9 budoucnosti<\/strong><\/h3>\n

\u00a0<\/strong>Za positivn\u00ed v\u00fdchodisko z\u00a0nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed situace pova\u017euje \u010cSMF kritickou, nicm\u00e9n\u011b fundovanou reflexi minulosti a spojen\u00ed n\u00e1rodn\u00edch, demokratick\u00fdch sil \u010cech\u016f, Slov\u00e1k\u016f a dal\u0161\u00edch n\u00e1rodnost\u00ed\u00a0b\u00fdval\u00e9ho \u010ceskoslovenska<\/em>\u00a0v\u00a0\u00fasil\u00ed o konstituci\u00a0\u010ceskoSlovenska nov\u00e9ho<\/em>\u00a0na federativn\u00edm nebo konfedera\u010dn\u00edm st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u00edm z\u00e1klad\u011b.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Jsme p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010deni o tom, \u017ee spole\u010dn\u00e9 autentick\u00e9 \u00fasil\u00ed t\u011bch sil, kter\u00e9 nezapomn\u011bly na odkaz na\u0161ich p\u0159edk\u016f, mohou na\u0161e zem\u011b vr\u00e1tit na p\u016fdu demokracie, pr\u00e1va, soci\u00e1ln\u00ed rovnov\u00e1hy i mravnosti. \u010cSMF je p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010deno, \u017ee se jedn\u00e1 o\u00a0geopolitickou nutnost v\u00a0budouc\u00ed st\u0159edn\u00ed Evrop\u011b.\u00a0<\/strong>V neposledn\u00ed \u0159ad\u011b z\u00e1rove\u0148 i o\u00a0politick\u00fd a mor\u00e1ln\u00ed dluh v\u016f\u010di minul\u00fdm generac\u00edm<\/strong>, kter\u00e9 ve jm\u00e9nu bratrstv\u00ed obou n\u00e1rod\u016f od dob tzv. n\u00e1rodn\u00edho obrozen\u00ed z\u00a0t\u00e9to my\u0161lenky vych\u00e1zely a v\u00a0dob\u00e1ch nejt\u011b\u017e\u0161\u00edch za svobodu, demokracii a prosperitu cel\u00e9 na\u0161\u00ed vlasti ob\u011btovaly sv\u00e9 \u017eivoty.<\/p>\n

Tyto generace dok\u00e1zaly rozpoznat sign\u00e1l doby p\u0159erodu a \u0161anci, kterou na\u0161im n\u00e1rod\u016fm nab\u00edz\u00ed. I nyn\u00ed vznik\u00e1 nov\u00fd sv\u011btov\u00fd po\u0159\u00e1dek a pokud tyto turbulence sv\u011bt p\u0159e\u017eije, otv\u00edr\u00e1 se v\u00a0jeho st\u00ednu \u0161ance pro na\u0161i spole\u010dnou budoucnost \u2013 tentokr\u00e1t jako v\u00fdsledek autentick\u00e9 v\u016fle obou n\u00e1rod\u016f.<\/p>\n

T\u0159icet t\u0159i rok\u016f odd\u011blen\u00e9 existence nemilosrdn\u011b potvrdily slova Milana Rastislava \u0160tef\u00e1nika a z\u00e1rove\u0148 vyvr\u00e1tily poh\u00e1dku o tom, jak n\u00e1m bude jeden bez druh\u00e9ho l\u00e9pe.<\/p>\n

Petr Schnur a Vladim\u00edra V\u00edtov\u00e1<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

….kter\u00fd je z\u00e1rove\u0148 st\u00e1topr\u00e1vn\u00ed v\u00fdzvou k\u00a0ob\u010dan\u016fm obou republik. V\u011bnov\u00e1no pam\u00e1tce historika Dr. Jana Tesa\u0159e, kter\u00fd…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":104212,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[975,10860,398,811,3340],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104211"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104211\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/104212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}