{"id":103251,"date":"2026-03-30T00:22:18","date_gmt":"2026-03-29T22:22:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/?p=103251"},"modified":"2026-03-29T14:56:31","modified_gmt":"2026-03-29T12:56:31","slug":"klara-samkova-do-roka-a-do-dne-ceska-advokatni-komoro","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/2026\/03\/30\/klara-samkova-do-roka-a-do-dne-ceska-advokatni-komoro\/","title":{"rendered":"Kl\u00e1ra Samkov\u00e1: Do roka a do dne\u2026 \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komoro!"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

P\u0159edsedkyn\u011b P\u0159edstavenstva \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory JUDr. Monika Novotn\u00e1 rozeslala v\u0161em advok\u00e1t\u016fm dopis, pro\u010d mus\u00ed zcela dramaticky zv\u00fd\u0161it p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky na \u010dinnost Komory. Zejm\u00e9na proto, aby Komora mohla advok\u00e1ty l\u00e9pe kontrolovat\u2026 Dlu\u017eno \u0159\u00edci, \u017ee tento krok zvedl mezi advok\u00e1ty naprostou vlnu nevole. Ne (jen) proto, \u017ee jde o pen\u00edze, a to u\u017e pen\u00edze nemal\u00e9, ale proto, \u017ee tak zvan\u011b \u201ejejich\u201c komora s nimi zach\u00e1z\u00ed jako se sv\u00fdmi rukojm\u00edmi \u2013 kter\u00fdmi tak\u00e9 sv\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem jsou.<\/em><\/p>\n

V\u00e1\u017een\u00e1 pan\u00ed p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b,<\/strong><\/p>\n

Stejn\u011b jako ostatn\u00ed advok\u00e1ti obdr\u017eela jsem i j\u00e1 V\u00e1\u0161 dopis, kter\u00fdm oznamujete dramatick\u00e9 zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed \u010dlensk\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komo\u0159e, kter\u00e9 od\u016fvod\u0148ujete zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00edm v\u00fddaj\u016f \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory, a to zejm\u00e9na na v\u00fdkon dozorov\u00e9 \u010dinnosti.<\/p>\n

Na rozd\u00edl obecn\u00e9 ve\u0159ejnosti a \u2013 k\u00a0m\u00e9mu neutuchaj\u00edc\u00edmu p\u0159ekvapen\u00ed i \u0159ady advok\u00e1t\u016f \u2013 mi je zn\u00e1mo, \u017ee \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora nen\u00ed z\u0159\u00edzena pro to, aby jak\u00fdmkoliv zp\u016fsobem obhajovala z\u00e1jmy advok\u00e1t\u016f, ale m\u00e1 jedin\u00fd z\u00e1konn\u00fd d\u016fvod existence, toti\u017e, aby dohl\u00ed\u017eela nad \u0159\u00e1dn\u00fdm v\u00fdkonem advokacie. P\u0159es to, \u017ee ochrana z\u00e1jm\u016f advok\u00e1t\u016f tedy nespad\u00e1 do \u010dinnosti \u010cAK, p\u0159ekro\u010dila dle m\u00e9ho n\u00e1zoru V\u00e1mi veden\u00e1 Komora pomyslnou \u010d\u00e1ru akceptovatelnosti jedn\u00e1n\u00ed \u010cAK ve sm\u011bru k\u00a0t\u011bm, kte\u0159\u00ed j\u00ed zaji\u0161\u0165uj\u00ed \u017eivobyt\u00ed, tedy advok\u00e1t\u016fm.<\/p>\n

Abych p\u0159ede\u0161la nedorozum\u011bn\u00edm, mus\u00edm t\u00e9\u017e podotknout, \u017ee si jsem v\u011bdoma toho, \u017ee advok\u00e1ti nejsou \u010dleny \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory. Ta je pouze t\u00edm, kdo umo\u017e\u0148uje v\u00fdkon advokacie zaps\u00e1n\u00edm uchaze\u010d\u016f o v\u00fdkon tohoto povol\u00e1n\u00ed do sv\u00fdch seznam\u016f. Nejsme pro \u010cAK ani \u010dlenov\u00e9, ani partne\u0159i \u2013 jsme pouze dotuj\u00edc\u00ed osoby, kter\u00e9 si lehce sado-masochistick\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem, kter\u00e9mu se \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 \u201estavovsk\u00e1 samospr\u00e1va\u201c vyb\u00edraj\u00ed jednou za \u010dty\u0159i roky ty, komu budou platit za to, \u017ee sm\u00ed vykon\u00e1vat sv\u00e9 zam\u011bstn\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n

V\u00e1\u0161 po\u017eadavek mne p\u0159im\u011bl k\u00a0tomu, abych formulovala sv\u00e9 v\u00fdhrady nejen ke zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed \u010dlensk\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f, kter\u00e9 (zp\u016fsobem, jsouc\u00edm v\u00a0rozporu se z\u00e1konem) po\u017eadujete, ale k\u00a0\u010dinnosti \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory v\u00a0pon\u011bkud \u0161ir\u0161\u00edm m\u011b\u0159\u00edtku.<\/p>\n

Postoj \u010cAK ke sv\u00fdm \u017eivitel\u016fm je ovl\u00e1d\u00e1n skute\u010dnost\u00ed, \u017ee pokud chce pr\u00e1vn\u00edk vykon\u00e1vat advokacii, nezb\u00fdv\u00e1 mu nic jin\u00e9ho ne\u017e podl\u00e9hat pr\u00e1v\u011b \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komo\u0159e. Plat\u00ed tedy \u00fapln\u00e1 monopolizace umo\u017en\u011bn\u00ed v\u00fdkonu advok\u00e1tn\u00ed praxe pr\u00e1v\u011b V\u00e1mi \u0159\u00edzen\u00fdm t\u011blesem. Proto\u017ee neexistuje alternativa, advok\u00e1ti se pod obavami ze ztr\u00e1ty chleba advok\u00e1ti p\u0159ed \u010cAK kr\u010d\u00ed, mnohdy ji pova\u017euj\u00ed za sv\u00e9ho nep\u0159\u00edtele a v\u00a0nejlep\u0161\u00edm p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b s\u00a0n\u00ed necht\u011bj\u00ed m\u00edt nic spole\u010dn\u00e9ho. To se ostatn\u011b projevuje i na \u00fa\u010dasti na sn\u011bmech \u010cAK, kter\u00e1 nikdy nep\u0159ekro\u010dila dvacetiprocentn\u00ed hranici, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e teprve vloni, za okolnost\u00ed, kdy dosavadn\u00ed stav byl ji\u017e naprosto ne\u00fanosn\u00fd, P\u0159edstavenstvo \u010cAK laskav\u011b povolilo mo\u017enost hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed na sn\u011bmu d\u00e1lkov\u00fdm p\u0159\u00edstupem. Ani to v\u0161ak na \u00fa\u010dasti na sn\u011bmu p\u0159\u00edli\u0161 nezm\u011bnilo, zjevn\u011b i z\u00a0beznad\u011bje, \u017ee by se cokoliv mohlo v\u016fbec zm\u011bnit.<\/p>\n

Jak ji\u017e \u0159e\u010deno, d\u016fvodem, pro kter\u00fd \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1te o \u201eporozum\u011bn\u00ed\u201c pro zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed poplatk\u016f \u010cAK, je zejm\u00e9na \u00fadajn\u00e9 zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed nutnosti kontroln\u00ed \u010dinnosti. Jak v\u0161ak s\u00a0touto svou povinnost\u00ed vykon\u00e1vat kontroln\u00ed \u010dinnosti nakl\u00e1dala Komora doposud? Odpov\u011b\u010f n\u00e1m d\u00e1v\u00e1 zn\u00e1m\u00fd p\u0159\u00edpad b\u00fdval\u00e9 advok\u00e1tky Sukov\u00e9, kter\u00e1 zpronev\u011b\u0159ila prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm advok\u00e1tn\u00edch \u00faschov klient\u016fm v\u00edce ne\u017e 160 milion\u016f korun. P\u0159itom z\u00a0m\u00e9di\u00ed nejednou zazn\u011blo, \u017ee \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora dostala zav\u010dasu \u0159adu podn\u011bt\u016f, kter\u00e9 m\u011bly sm\u011b\u0159ovat k\u00a0okam\u017eit\u00e9mu auditu cel\u00e9 \u010dinnosti dan\u00e9 advok\u00e1tky. Komora se ov\u0161em p\u0159i tak zvan\u00e9m prov\u011b\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed tohoto p\u0159\u00edpadu zachovala zp\u016fsobem, kter\u00fd mnoz\u00ed z\u00a0koleg\u016f advok\u00e1t\u016f, zab\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00edch se trestn\u00edm pr\u00e1vem, ozna\u010dili za stav, ve kter\u00e9m by bylo na m\u00edst\u011b zah\u00e1jit rozs\u00e1hl\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpravn\u00e9 trestn\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed proti samotn\u00e9 \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komo\u0159e i jej\u00edm p\u0159edstavitel\u016fm, kte\u0159\u00ed za zcela nedbal\u00e9 prov\u011b\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed byli zodpov\u011bdn\u00ed.[1]<\/a>\u00a0 Toto podez\u0159en\u00ed zdaleka nem\u011bli pouze n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed kolegov\u00e9 \u2013 advok\u00e1ti, ale pravd\u011bpodobn\u011b i nyn\u00ed pokra\u010duje \u0161et\u0159en\u00ed O\u010cvT\u0158, pro\u010d \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora nezjistila p\u0159i sv\u00fdch tak zvan\u00fdch kontrol\u00e1ch \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9 pochyben\u00ed, kdy\u017e k\u00a0prov\u011brk\u00e1m\u00a0m\u011bla podklady s\u00a0formulacemi o z\u00e1va\u017en\u00fdch podez\u0159en\u00edch jak od Finan\u010dn\u00edho analytick\u00e9ho \u00fa\u0159adu i od policie. M\u00edsto toho, aby \u010cAK \u2013 a to zejm\u00e9na V\u00e1mi veden\u00e9 na podzim 2025 zvolen\u00e9 p\u0159edstavenstvo \u010cAK \u2013 provedlo rozs\u00e1hl\u00e9 p\u00e1tr\u00e1n\u00ed po skute\u010dn\u00fdch vin\u00edc\u00edch t\u00e9to z\u00e1sadn\u00ed trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti a zejm\u00e9na po vin\u00edc\u00edch selh\u00e1n\u00ed jedin\u00e9 z\u00e1konn\u00e9 povinnosti \u010cAK, jeho\u017e d\u016fsledky nejen zni\u010dily \u0159adu ob\u010dan\u016f, ale p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm nen\u00e1vratn\u011b po\u0161kodily pov\u011bst advokacie\u2026 co ud\u011blala \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora? Dopustila se jedn\u00e1n\u00ed, kter\u00e9 je naprosto neslu\u010diteln\u00e9 s\u00a0element\u00e1rn\u00edmi z\u00e1sadami civilizovan\u00e9ho pr\u00e1vn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du, toti\u017e zakotvila kolektivn\u00ed zodpov\u011bdnost sv\u00fdch ne-\u010dlen\u016f, tedy osob, kter\u00e9 s\u00a0p\u00e1chanou trestnou \u010dinnost\u00ed m\u011bly spole\u010dn\u00e9 pouze to, \u017ee vykon\u00e1valy stejn\u00fd druh \u010dinnosti jako ob\u017ealovan\u00e1\/odsouzen\u00e1 Sukov\u00e1, toti\u017e advokacii, za trestnou \u010dinnost jim nezn\u00e1m\u00fdch osob. Z\u0159\u00eddila tak zvan\u00fd \u201egaran\u010dn\u00ed fond\u201c, kter\u00fd nem\u00e1 jin\u00fd \u00fa\u010del ne\u017e nahrazovat \u0161kodu, zp\u016fsobenou trestnou \u010dinnost\u00ed pachatel\u016f z\u00a0kapes osob zcela bez\u00fahonn\u00fdch, kter\u00e9 nemaj\u00ed s\u00a0trestnou \u010dinnost\u00ed naprosto nic spole\u010dn\u00e9ho. \u00a0Nejde jen o pen\u00edze \u2013 jde o prolomen\u00ed syst\u00e9mu pr\u00e1va, syst\u00e9mu zodpov\u011bdnosti a tradic, kter\u00e9 byly v\u00a0na\u0161em pr\u00e1vn\u00edm syst\u00e9mu cizelov\u00e1ny od dob vzniku Dvan\u00e1cti desek \u0159\u00edmsk\u00e9ho pr\u00e1va (450\u2013451 p\u0159. n. l).\u00a0 Proto mi dovolte \u0159\u00edci jedno: pokud se dom\u00e1h\u00e1te zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed \u010dlensk\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f z\u00a0d\u016fvodu nutnosti zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed dohledov\u00e9 \u010dinnosti, pak je nutno po\u017eadovat zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed dohledov\u00e9 \u010dinnosti p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm nad V\u00e1mi vedenou \u010ceskou advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komorou.<\/p>\n

Krom\u011b toho, \u017ee V\u00e1mi vznesen\u00fd po\u017eadavek je neod\u016fvodn\u011bn\u00fd, zav\u00e1d\u011bj\u00edc\u00ed a pro \u010destn\u00e9 advok\u00e1ty, kter\u00fdch je, trouf\u00e1m si po 32 letech v\u00fdkonu advokacie tvrdit, 99 %, poni\u017euj\u00edc\u00ed, je tak\u00e9 v\u00a0rozporu se Z\u00e1konem o advokacii.<\/p>\n

Ten toti\u017e ve sv\u00e9m ust. \u00a7 43 p\u00edsm e) \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee sn\u011bmu p\u0159\u00edslu\u0161\u00ed\u2026<\/p>\n

\u201ee)\u00a0schvalovat stavovsk\u00fdm p\u0159edpisem v\u00fd\u0161i plateb advok\u00e1t\u016f podle \u00a7 30 odst. 1, pop\u0159\u00edpad\u011b stanovit z\u00e1sady pro ur\u010den\u00ed jejich v\u00fd\u0161e p\u0159edstavenstvem\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

Nyn\u00ed platn\u00e9 \u201ez\u00e1sady\u201c pro stanoven\u00ed v\u00fd\u0161e plateb advok\u00e1t\u016f \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komo\u0159e v\u0161ak neobsahuj\u00ed zmocn\u011bn\u00ed pro tak dramatick\u00e9 zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed poplatk\u016f \u010cAK, a to zejm\u00e9na z\u00a0tak absurdn\u00edch pa-d\u016fvod\u016f, kter\u00e9 jste ve sv\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpisu uvedla. Jedn\u00e1 se o jednozna\u010dn\u00e9 p\u0159ekro\u010den\u00ed pravomoc\u00ed P\u0159edstavenstva \u010cAK a zjevn\u00e9 pohrd\u00e1n\u00ed sn\u011bmem advok\u00e1t\u016f, kter\u00fd se uskute\u010dnil p\u0159ed pouh\u00fdm p\u016fl rokem. Tam jste ov\u0161em takov\u00fd po\u017eadavek vzn\u00e9st nemohli, proto\u017ee byste nebyli zvoleni \u2013 a o tom to cel\u00e9 je! Jedn\u00e1 se o obejit\u00ed nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho org\u00e1nu \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory, toti\u017e Sn\u011bmu, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e v\u00a0\u010dl. 30 odst. 1 Z\u00e1kona o advokacii m\u00e1te zakotven hned i exeku\u010dn\u00ed titul: \u017ee t\u0159eba bude zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku na \u010dinnost \u010cAK posl\u00e9ze zru\u0161eno? Kdo by se o to staral! Ne\u017e k\u00a0tomu v\u00a0r\u00e1mci spr\u00e1vn\u00edho soudnictv\u00ed dojde, bude m\u00edt \u201erebeluj\u00edc\u00ed advok\u00e1t\u201c ji\u017e Komorou d\u00e1vno pozastavenou \u010dinnost pro neplacen\u00ed p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f, p\u0159\u00edpadn\u011b mu bude \u201enavrch\u201c ulo\u017een\u00e1 pokuta, v\u00a0ka\u017ed\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b bude profesn\u011b zruinov\u00e1n.<\/p>\n

Proto\u017ee z\u00a0Va\u0161eho p\u0159\u00edpisu je zcela z\u0159ejm\u00e9, \u017ee zastra\u0161ujete advok\u00e1ty, aby se podvolili jedn\u00e1n\u00ed P\u0159edstavenstva \u010cAK a bez protest\u016f zaplatili jak\u00e9koliv ne-\u010dlensk\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvky Komo\u0159e, \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1m V\u00e1s, abyste postupovala dle ust. \u00a7 42 odst. 4 Z\u00e1kona o advokacii, kter\u00fd zn\u00ed:<\/p>\n

\u201eP\u0159edstavenstvo sn\u011bm svol\u00e1 t\u00e9\u017e tehdy, pokud o to p\u00edsemn\u011b po\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1 v pr\u016fb\u011bhu dvou kalend\u00e1\u0159n\u00edch m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f alespo\u0148 t\u0159etina v\u0161ech advok\u00e1t\u016f.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

Samoz\u0159ejm\u011b se spol\u00e9h\u00e1te na to, \u017ee b\u011bhem pouh\u00fdch dvou m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f \u2013 tedy po\u010d\u00ednaj\u00ed m\u00fdm p\u0159\u00edpisem, tedy do 28. 5. 2026 \u2013 se cca 4.350 advok\u00e1t\u016f nezm\u016f\u017ee na to, aby kvalifikovan\u011b po\u017e\u00e1dali o svol\u00e1n\u00ed sn\u011bmu! Proto tak\u00e9 se s\u00a0tou drzou samoz\u0159ejmost\u00ed obrac\u00edte na advok\u00e1ty zd\u00e1nliv\u011b s\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dost\u00ed o porozum\u011bn\u00ed, ve skute\u010dnosti v\u0161ak se jen vysm\u00edv\u00e1te. Nicm\u00e9n\u011b i p\u0159es to, \u017ee spln\u011bn\u00ed z\u00e1konn\u00e9 podm\u00ednky pro svol\u00e1n\u00ed sn\u011bmu je tak obt\u00ed\u017en\u00e9 (v\u017edy\u0165 ve skute\u010dnosti se nikdy tolik advok\u00e1t\u016f sn\u011bmu ani nez\u00fa\u010dastnilo) apeluji na V\u00e1s, abyste, pokud ve V\u00e1s zbyla je\u0161t\u011b n\u011bjak\u00e1 \u010dest, sn\u011bm Vy a P\u0159edstavenstvo \u010cAK svolali, a to i tehdy, kdy\u017e se \u017e\u00e1dost\u00ed nesejde dostate\u010dn\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed. Pokud tak neu\u010din\u00edte, legitimita jak\u00fdchkoliv rozhodnut\u00ed V\u00e1mi veden\u00e9ho p\u0159edstavenstva bude ot\u0159esena, co\u017e vytrv\u00e1 a\u017e do dal\u0161\u00edho sn\u011bmu.<\/p>\n

Pro sn\u011bm, o jeho\u017e svol\u00e1n\u00ed t\u00edmto \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1m, p\u0159edest\u00edr\u00e1m n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed<\/p>\n

N\u00c1VRH PROGRAMU SN\u011aMU \u010cAK:<\/strong><\/h3>\n

1)<\/strong> Odvol\u00e1n\u00ed dosavadn\u00edho P\u0159edstavenstva \u010cAK, Kontroln\u00ed rady a K\u00e1rn\u00fdch komis\u00ed a vyps\u00e1n\u00ed nov\u00fdch voleb do t\u011bchto org\u00e1n\u016f.<\/p>\n

OD\u016eVODN\u011aN\u00cd: Sou\u010dasn\u00e9 veden\u00ed \u010cAK po\u0161kozuje z\u00e1jmy advokacie jako stavu a z\u00e1jmy \u010cesk\u00e9 republiky jako pr\u00e1vn\u00edho st\u00e1tu. Je nutno, aby se advok\u00e1ti rozhodli, kdo a jak\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem m\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed stav reprezentovat.<\/p>\n

2)<\/strong> Jedn\u00e1n\u00ed a hlasov\u00e1n\u00ed o vysloven\u00ed souhlasu se zn\u011bn\u00edm n\u00e1vrhu novely Z\u00e1kona \u010d. 166\/1993 Sb. o Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edm kontroln\u00edm \u00fa\u0159adu tak, aby ve smyslu \u00a7 3 podl\u00e9hala kontrole NK\u00da i \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora. V\u00a0souvislosti s\u00a0t\u00edm t\u00e9\u017e vysloven\u00ed souhlasu s\u00a0n\u00e1vrhem na zm\u011bnu \u00dastavy \u010cR, a to \u010dl. 97 odst. 1, p\u0159\u00edp. 98, upravuj\u00edc\u00ed pravomoci NK\u00da. Zmocn\u011bn\u00ed nov\u00e9ho p\u0159edstavenstva, aby se s\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dost\u00ed o zakotven\u00ed t\u011bchto zm\u011bn obr\u00e1tilo na Vl\u00e1du \u010cR, Poslaneckou sn\u011bmovnu a Sen\u00e1t.<\/p>\n

OD\u016eVODN\u011aN\u00cd: V\u00a0sou\u010dasn\u00e9 dob\u011b dle Z\u00e1kona o advokacii m\u016f\u017ee finan\u010dn\u00ed hospoda\u0159en\u00ed \u010cAK kontrolovat pouze Sn\u011bm. Na kter\u00fd (v posledn\u00edch cca 35 letech) nedorazilo nikdy v\u00edce ne\u017e 20 % advok\u00e1t\u016f a kter\u00fd trv\u00e1 jeden den, ve kter\u00e9m se m\u00e1 \u201eprobrat\u201c v\u0161e, v\u010detn\u011b \u010dasov\u011b n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u00e9 volby org\u00e1n\u016f \u010cAK. Pokud chce advok\u00e1t podrobnosti o hospoda\u0159en\u00ed \u010cAK, mus\u00ed si je tzv.\u201cvysto\u0161estkovat\u201c, tedy po\u017e\u00e1dat \u010cAK o informace dle z\u00e1k. \u010d. 106\/1999Sb. Tak, jako kdokoliv jin\u00fd. N\u011bkdy n\u011bjak\u00e9 informace dostane, n\u011bkdy ne. Nikdo nem\u00e1 ani \u0161anci zjistit, jestli se n\u011bkdo na n\u011bco ptal. Fakticky je finan\u010dn\u00ed hospoda\u0159en\u00ed \u010cAK bez dozoru. Na \u010ceskou advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komoru byla delegov\u00e1na povinnost st\u00e1tu, ulo\u017een\u00e1 mu mezin\u00e1rodn\u00edmi smlouvami, toti\u017e zaji\u0161\u0165ovat pr\u00e1vo na p\u0159\u00edstup k\u00a0pr\u00e1vn\u00ed pomoci v\u00a0r\u00e1mci zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed pr\u00e1va na spravedliv\u00fd proces. Jestli\u017ee byla na \u010cAK delegov\u00e1na pravomoc st\u00e1tu, m\u011bla by b\u00fdt Komora tak\u00e9 st\u00e1tem kontrolovan\u00e1, a to minim\u00e1ln\u011b co do sm\u011bru efektivity jej\u00edho hospoda\u0159en\u00ed p\u0159i napl\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed jej\u00edch ve\u0159ejnopr\u00e1vn\u00edch \u00fakol\u016f.<\/p>\n

3)<\/strong> Jedn\u00e1n\u00ed o sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed a rozvrstven\u00ed poplatk\u016f komo\u0159e dle ro\u010dn\u00edho obratu z \u010dinnosti advok\u00e1ta a p\u0159ijet\u00ed adekv\u00e1tn\u00edch rozhodnut\u00ed o v\u00fd\u0161i poplatk\u016f v\u00a0z\u00e1vislosti na v\u00fd\u0161i obratu.<\/p>\n

OD\u016eVODN\u011aN\u00cd: P\u0159ed p\u00e1r t\u00fddny m\u011bla pan\u00ed p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b \u010cAK srdceryvn\u00fd rozhovor, ve kter\u00e9m mimo jin\u00e9 uvedla:\u00a0\u201eKomora si vede statistiky a trend \u00fabytku advok\u00e1t\u016f v regionech je zcela z\u0159ejm\u00fd. Pro mlad\u00e9 advok\u00e1ty prost\u0159ed\u00ed n\u011bkter\u00fdch okres\u016f nen\u00ed \u00fapln\u011b atraktivn\u00ed, proto\u017ee maj\u00ed obavu, \u017ee si tam nevytvo\u0159\u00ed klientelu. Chceme to zm\u011bnit<\/em>.\u201c[2]<\/a>\u00a0Zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed poplatk\u016f Komo\u0159e jde p\u0159itom p\u0159esn\u011b proti tomu, co p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b P\u0159edstavenstva \u010cAK ve sv\u00e9m rozhovoru uvedla. Velk\u00e9 korporace s\u00a0miliardov\u00fdmi obraty bude n\u011bjak\u00e9 zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed \u010dlensk\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f naprosto zanedbatelnou z\u00e1le\u017eitosti, tak zvan\u011b \u201epod (jejich) rozli\u0161ovac\u00ed schopnosti\u201c.\u00a0 Zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00ed se dotkne p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm advok\u00e1t\u016fm v\u00a0mal\u00fdch m\u011bstech, jejich\u017e p\u0159\u00edjmy n\u011bkdy ani nedosahuj\u00ed \u00fa\u0159ednick\u00fdch plat\u016f, o platech soudc\u016f a st\u00e1tn\u00edch z\u00e1stupc\u016f ani nehovo\u0159e. T\u00edmto krokem \u010cAK usilovn\u011b napom\u00e1h\u00e1 vylidn\u011bn\u00ed advok\u00e1t\u016f z\u00a0m\u00e9n\u011b atraktivn\u00edch m\u00edst, t\u00edm zt\u011b\u017euje \u201eoby\u010dejn\u00fdm lidem\u201c p\u0159\u00edstup k\u00a0pr\u00e1vn\u00ed pomoci, kterou zdra\u017euje dojezdov\u00fdmi z\u00e1le\u017eitostmi. Tedy, jin\u00fdmi slovy, jedn\u00e1 proti z\u00e1jmu st\u00e1tu a jeho mezin\u00e1rodn\u00edmi smlouvami ur\u010den\u00fdmi povinnostmi k\u00a0zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed pr\u00e1va na spravedliv\u00fd proces. Nav\u00edc rovn\u00fdm p\u0159\u00edstupem k\u00a0\u010dlensk\u00e9mu p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku mal\u00ed samostatn\u00ed advok\u00e1ti, \u017eiv\u00edc\u00ed se denn\u00ed prac\u00ed \u2013 pr\u00e1vn\u00ed pomoc\u00ed fyzick\u00fdm osob\u00e1m \u2013 nepodnikatel\u016fm, fakticky dotuj\u00ed velk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed korporace. To je nejenom\u017ee neuv\u011b\u0159iteln\u00e9, je to taky nespravedliv\u00e9, nebo\u0165 z\u00e1t\u011b\u017e je op\u011bt p\u0159en\u00e1\u0161en\u00e1 na ty chud\u0161\u00ed, a to chud\u0161\u00ed zcela znateln\u011b. Samostatnou kapitolou je pak vyb\u00edr\u00e1n\u00ed \u010dlensk\u00fdch p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvk\u016f od mlad\u00fdch advok\u00e1tek, kter\u00e9 si v\u00a0dob\u011b, kdy maj\u00ed mal\u00e9 d\u011bti, dovolily tu drzost si ponechat p\u00e1r klient\u016f, kter\u00e9 p\u0159ed t\u00edm m\u011bly dlouhodob\u011b a necht\u011bj\u00ed je opustit. Ty mus\u00ed potupn\u011b ka\u017edoro\u010dn\u011b \u017e\u00e1dat o umo\u017en\u011bn\u00ed sn\u00ed\u017een\u00ed povinn\u00e9ho p\u0159\u00edsp\u011bvku z\u00a0d\u016fvodu p\u00e9\u010de o d\u00edt\u011b, a to do pevn\u011b stanoven\u00e9ho data. Pokud toto datum nestihnou (na p\u0159\u00edklad z\u00a0d\u016fvodu porodu a\u017e po term\u00ednu uz\u00e1v\u011brky pod\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed \u017e\u00e1dosti), maj\u00ed dal\u0161\u00ed rok sm\u016flu.<\/p>\n

4)<\/strong> Jednat o p\u0159eveden\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edch slu\u017eeb zp\u011bt do sn\u00ed\u017een\u00fdch sazeb DPH. Pov\u011b\u0159it p\u0159edstavenstvo t\u00edmto jedn\u00e1n\u00edm s\u00a0Vl\u00e1dou \u010cR.<\/p>\n

OD\u016eVODN\u011aN\u00cd: A\u017e do \u00fa\u010dinnosti z\u00e1k. 235\/2004 Sb., tedy od 1. 5. 2004, kdy \u010cesk\u00e1 republika vstoupila do Evropsk\u00e9 unie, byly pr\u00e1vn\u00ed slu\u017eby ve sn\u00ed\u017een\u00e9 sazb\u011b 5 %, kdy\u017e z\u00e1kladn\u00ed sazba byla 19 %. Nyn\u00ed je DPH pr\u00e1vn\u00edch slu\u017eeb 21 %. Toto op\u011bt postihuje p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm fyzick\u00e9 osoby \u2013 nepodnikatele, kte\u0159\u00ed pot\u0159ebuj\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00ed slu\u017eby ve sv\u00fdch soukrom\u00fdch z\u00e1le\u017eitostech. Velk\u00e9 korporace a podnikatel\u00e9 jsou prakticky v\u0161ichni pl\u00e1tci DPH, tak\u017ee DPH za pr\u00e1vn\u00ed slu\u017eby si prost\u011b uplatn\u00ed jako odpo\u010det \u2013 fakticky tedy DPH \u201edostanou zp\u011bt\u201c. Op\u011bt doch\u00e1z\u00ed k\u00a0tomu, \u017ee fyzick\u00e9 osoby \u2013 nepodnikatel\u00e9 \u2013 maj\u00ed v\u00fdznamn\u011b finan\u010dn\u011b obt\u00ed\u017en\u011bj\u0161\u00ed p\u0159\u00edstup k\u00a0poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edch slu\u017eeb. Na dodr\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed pr\u00e1va a v\u0161eobecn\u00e9 \u00farovni pr\u00e1vn\u00edho \u0159\u00e1du m\u00e1 p\u0159itom st\u00e1t eminentn\u00ed z\u00e1jem. T\u00edmto nerovn\u00fdm p\u0159\u00edstupem k\u00a0z\u00edsk\u00e1n\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00ed pomoci pr\u00e1v\u011b v\u016f\u010di \u201eoby\u010dejn\u00fdm\u201c ob\u010dan\u016fm zvy\u0161uje nerovnost p\u0159\u00edstupu k\u00a0pr\u00e1vn\u00ed ochran\u011b a op\u011bt \u2013 paradoxn\u011b \u2013 up\u0159ednost\u0148uje pr\u00e1vn\u00ed pomoc podnikatelsk\u00fdm subjekt\u016fm, u kter\u00fdch je mo\u017eno d\u016fvodn\u011b p\u0159edpokl\u00e1dat jejich v\u011bt\u0161\u00ed finan\u010dn\u00ed robustnost. St\u00e1t tak jedn\u00e1 v\u00a0rozporu se sv\u00fdmi vlastn\u00edmi z\u00e1jmy a se z\u00e1jmy ob\u010dan\u016f, a to za dlouholet\u00e9ho ml\u010den\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory.<\/p>\n

5)<\/strong> Jedn\u00e1n\u00ed o vzniku dal\u0161\u00ed komory pr\u00e1vnick\u00fdch profes\u00ed. Pov\u011b\u0159en\u00ed p\u0159edstavenstva k\u00a0jedn\u00e1n\u00ed s\u00a0vl\u00e1dou o zm\u011bn\u011b z\u00e1kona o advokacii, ze kter\u00e9ho vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 existence pouze jedn\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory.<\/p>\n

OD\u016eVODN\u011aN\u00cd: Jak vypl\u00fdv\u00e1 z\u00a0v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9ho, jedn\u00edm z\u00a0d\u016fvod\u016f p\u0159ez\u00edrav\u00e9ho postoje \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory k\u00a0ne-\u010dlen\u016fm, advok\u00e1t\u016fm, je monopolizace \u010ceskou advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komorou na ud\u011blov\u00e1n\u00ed opr\u00e1vn\u011bn\u00ed k\u00a0poskytov\u00e1n\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00edch slu\u017eeb. Ji\u017e emeritn\u00ed p\u0159edseda \u010cAK, JUDr. Martin Vychope\u0148 p\u0159i tom ve sv\u00e9m projevu k\u00a025. v\u00fdro\u010d\u00ed svobodn\u00e9 advokacie v\u00a0z\u00e1\u0159\u00ed 2015e[3]<\/a>\u00a0uvedl, \u017ee<\/p>\n

\u201e\u2026nastala doba pro \u0159e\u0161en\u00ed, kter\u00e9 ji\u017e d\u0159\u00edve p\u0159ijali na\u0161i n\u011bme\u010dt\u00ed kolegov\u00e9 \u2013 pro zalo\u017een\u00ed spolku pro obranu pr\u00e1v advok\u00e1t\u016f, podobn\u00e9ho DAV na stran\u011b jedn\u00e9 a \u00faprav\u011b postaven\u00ed \u010cAK, p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm jako spr\u00e1vn\u00edho org\u00e1nu, obdobn\u011b jako BRAK na stran\u011b druh\u00e9.\u201c<\/em><\/p>\n

To, \u017ee se \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora m\u00e1 zaj\u00edmat a br\u00e1nit z\u00e1jmy advok\u00e1t\u016f nebylo do Z\u00e1kona o advokacii inkorporov\u00e1no doposud, a to p\u0159es to, \u017ee samotn\u00e9 P\u0159edstavenstvo iniciovalo jin\u00e9 zm\u011bny v\u00a0Z\u00e1konu o advokacii. Ty v\u0161ak \u0161ly prakticky v\u017edy k\u00a0t\u00ed\u017ei advok\u00e1t\u016f a k\u00a0roz\u0161\u00ed\u0159en\u00ed k\u00e1rn\u00fdch pravomoc\u00ed \u010cAK. Je na \u010dase ustanovit druhou advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komoru, kter\u00e1 by v\u00a0obsahu sv\u00e9ho p\u016fsoben\u00ed m\u011bla ochranu z\u00e1jm\u016f advok\u00e1t\u016f. Je tak\u00e9 na m\u00edst\u011b uva\u017eovat o znovuustaven\u00ed Komory komer\u010dn\u00edch pr\u00e1vn\u00edk\u016f. Nelze p\u0159ehl\u00e9dnout, \u017ee i v\u00a0P\u0159edstavenstvu je zna\u010dn\u00e9 mno\u017estv\u00ed advok\u00e1t\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed jsou spjati s\u00a0advok\u00e1tn\u00edmi korporacemi a samostatn\u00ed advok\u00e1ti, tedy ti skute\u010dn\u011b samostatn\u00ed advok\u00e1ti jsou v\u00a0org\u00e1nech \u010cAK zcela podreprezentov\u00e1ni. Je tak\u00e9 nutno upozornit na to, \u017ee z\u00e1jmy \u201evysok\u00e9 advokacie\u201c, zab\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00ed se p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm obchodn\u00edm a korpor\u00e1tn\u00edm pr\u00e1vem, jsou zcela jin\u00e9 ne\u017e z\u00e1jmy samostatn\u00fdch advok\u00e1t\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed jsou p\u0159ehl\u00ed\u017eeni. Jestli\u017ee o svol\u00e1n\u00ed sn\u011bmu m\u016f\u017ee po\u017e\u00e1dat 1\/3 advok\u00e1t\u016f, bylo by na m\u00edst\u011b, aby podobn\u00e9mu po\u010dtu, tedy 1\/3 nebo sp\u00ed\u0161e \u00bc advok\u00e1t\u016f bylo dovoleno p\u0159i spln\u011bn\u00ed dal\u0161\u00edch z\u00e1konn\u00fdch podm\u00ednek ustanovit si dal\u0161\u00ed komoru.<\/p>\n

Na tomto m\u00edst\u011b je t\u0159eba tak\u00e9 upozornit na zcela nedostate\u010dn\u00e1 pravidla reguluj\u00edc\u00ed, kdo je \u201esamostatn\u00fd advok\u00e1t\u201c a kdo poskytuje pr\u00e1vn\u00ed slu\u017eby v\u00a0r\u00e1mci advok\u00e1tn\u00ed korporace nebo skupiny. Je zcela b\u011b\u017en\u00e9, \u017ee ve ve\u0159ejn\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti matriky je advok\u00e1t prezentov\u00e1n jako samostatn\u00fd advok\u00e1t, zat\u00edmco na webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch advok\u00e1tn\u00ed korporace je prezentov\u00e1n jako \u010dlen t\u00fdmu. Tyto skute\u010dnosti maj\u00ed z\u00e1sadn\u00ed dopad ve v\u011bci poji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed, da\u0148ov\u00fdch z\u00e1le\u017eitostech i rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed klient\u016f o tom na kter\u00e9ho advok\u00e1ta se obr\u00e1t\u00ed. \u010cAK neprojevila ani minim\u00e1ln\u00ed z\u00e1jem v\u00a0tomto ud\u011blat po\u0159\u00e1dek.<\/p>\n

6)<\/strong> Z\u00e1vazek p\u0159edstavenstva z\u0159\u00eddit ve\u0159ejn\u011b p\u0159\u00edstupnou (by\u0165 samoz\u0159ejm\u011b anonymizovanou) sb\u00edrku k\u00e1rn\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed a d\u00e1le rozsudk\u016f, ve kter\u00fdch \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora vystupuje nejen jako \u017ealobce, ale p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm jako \u017ealovan\u00fd.<\/p>\n

OD\u016eVODN\u011aN\u00cd: O kompletn\u00edm seznamu k\u00e1rn\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed hovo\u0159\u00ed \u2013 a slibuje ji vytvo\u0159it \u2013 ji\u017e nejm\u00e9n\u011b dv\u011b p\u0159edch\u00e1zej\u00edc\u00ed P\u0159edstavenstva \u010cAK. Pokroky na tomto poli jsou, av\u0161ak zcela nedostate\u010dn\u00e9. St\u00e1le se jedn\u00e1 o v\u00fdb\u011br z\u00a0k\u00e1rn\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed. Rozhodovac\u00ed praxe k\u00e1rn\u00fdch sen\u00e1t\u016f je nekonzistentn\u00ed a zcela nep\u0159ehledn\u00e1. Za pov\u0161imnut\u00ed stoj\u00ed, \u017ee kdy\u017e se advok\u00e1t odhodl\u00e1 podat do k\u00e1rn\u00e9ho rozhodnut\u00ed spr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u017ealobu, velmi \u010dasto usp\u011bje. K\u00a0souboru rozsudk\u016f spr\u00e1vn\u00edho soudu a Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho spr\u00e1vn\u00edho soudu (o \u00dastavn\u00edm soudu nehovo\u0159e) se pak lze dobrat pouze \u010d\u00e1ste\u010dn\u011b a za zv\u00fd\u0161en\u00e9ho \u00fasil\u00ed. Obzvl\u00e1\u0161t\u011b zav\u00e1d\u011bj\u00edc\u00ed je m\u00edsty a\u017e sv\u00e9voln\u00e9 rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed Kontroln\u00ed rady i k\u00e1rn\u00fdch sen\u00e1t\u016f o tom, \u010d\u00edm je a \u010d\u00edm nen\u00ed poru\u0161ena \u201ed\u016fstojnost advok\u00e1ta\u201c. Netransparentnost k\u00e1rn\u00fdch rozhodnut\u00ed nav\u00e1d\u00ed k\u00a0mo\u017enosti zneu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1n\u00ed k\u00e1rn\u00fdch \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, a to zejm\u00e9na ve sm\u011bru, kdy\u017e se jedn\u00e1 o vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed advok\u00e1ta, vztahuj\u00edc\u00ed se k\u00a0politick\u00fdm t\u00e9mat\u016fm. Krom\u011b toho je \u010cAK \u017ealov\u00e1n advok\u00e1ty i jin\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem \u2013 zejm\u00e9na \u017ealobami na ochranu osobnosti. Zdaleka ne v\u017edy jsou tyto \u017ealoby ne\u00fasp\u011b\u0161n\u00e9. O jejich existenci v\u0161ak advok\u00e1ti v\u016fbec nev\u011bd\u00ed, \u010cAK se jimi pochopiteln\u011b nechlub\u00ed. O dal\u0161\u00edch soudn\u00edch \u0159\u00edzen\u00edch, kde je \u010cAK jednou z\u00a0procesn\u00edch stran pak nen\u00ed zn\u00e1mo v\u016fbec nic do doby, ne\u017e si advok\u00e1t \u2013 stejn\u011b jako kdokoliv jin\u00fd \u2013 po\u017e\u00e1d\u00e1 o jejich p\u0159ehled na z\u00e1klad\u011b z\u00e1kona o svobodn\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edstupu k\u00a0informac\u00edm.<\/p>\n

7)<\/strong> Z\u00e1vazek p\u0159edstavenstva zm\u011bnit postaven\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory tak, \u017ee:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \u010cAK je v\u00e1z\u00e1na ml\u010denlivost\u00ed ve v\u0161ech v\u011bcech, kter\u00e9 se dozv\u00ed od advok\u00e1t\u016f \u2013 na p\u0159\u00edklad ve v\u011bci k\u00e1rn\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed \u2013 ve stejn\u00e9m rozsahu, v\u00a0jak\u00e9m jsou ml\u010denlivost\u00ed v\u00e1z\u00e1ni samotn\u00ed advok\u00e1ti.<\/li>\n
  2. \u010cAK je subjektem sm\u00edr\u010d\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed s\u00a0advok\u00e1tem<\/li>\n
  3. V\u00a0\u017e\u00e1dostech advok\u00e1t\u016fm o vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed se ke st\u00ed\u017enosti uvede pou\u010den\u00ed, \u017ee advok\u00e1t se m\u016f\u017ee vyj\u00e1d\u0159it, av\u0161ak nebude mu toto ukl\u00e1dat jako povinnost.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    OD\u016eVODN\u011aN\u00cd: V\u011bt\u0161ina laick\u00e9 ve\u0159ejnosti, a dokonce i advok\u00e1t\u016f automaticky p\u0159edpokl\u00e1d\u00e1, \u017ee \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora je v\u00e1z\u00e1na stejn\u00fdmi povinnostmi jako advok\u00e1t. Naprosto to nen\u00ed pravda. \u010cAK \u2013 kontroln\u00ed odd\u011blen\u00ed naprosto nem\u00e1 probl\u00e9m s\u00a0t\u00edm sd\u011blit st\u011b\u017eovateli obsah \u201evyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00ed\u201c advok\u00e1ta, \u010d\u00edm\u017e m\u016f\u017ee velmi zna\u010dn\u011b pos\u00edlit procesn\u00ed postaven\u00ed st\u011b\u017eovatele ve sporu s\u00a0protistranou, na jej\u00edho\u017e advok\u00e1ta si st\u011b\u017euje. Advok\u00e1t odpov\u00edd\u00e1 a \u201evysv\u011btluje\u201c v\u00a0dobr\u00e9 v\u00ed\u0159e, \u017ee je chr\u00e1n\u011bn ml\u010denlivost\u00ed. To v\u0161ak ze strany \u010cAK neplat\u00ed. Stejn\u011b tak \u010cAK nen\u00ed subjektem sm\u00edr\u010d\u00edho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed, to z\u00e1kon a vnitrostavovsk\u00e9 p\u0159edpisy upravuj\u00ed pouze mezi advok\u00e1ty. Za t\u00e9to situace pro ochranu vlastn\u00edch z\u00e1jm\u016f advok\u00e1tovi nezb\u00fdv\u00e1 nic jin\u00e9ho ne\u017e \u010cAK \u017ealovat. Velk\u00e1 \u010d\u00e1st advok\u00e1t\u016f je p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010dena o tom, \u017ee jestli\u017ee z\u00a0kontroln\u00edho odd\u011blen\u00ed autoritativn\u011b dostane p\u0159\u00edkaz vyj\u00e1d\u0159it se ke st\u00ed\u017enosti \u2013 obvykle v\u00a0m\u00edrn\u011b absurdn\u00ed lh\u016ft\u011b deseti dn\u016f, kdy\u017e k\u00a0p\u0159\u00edpadn\u00e9mu k\u00e1rn\u00e9mu \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed dojde p\u0159inejlep\u0161\u00edm za rok \u2013 je to jeho z\u00e1konn\u00e1 povinnost. Nikoliv. Povinnost\u00ed advok\u00e1ta je p\u0159edat spis. \u00a0Pou\u010den\u00ed v\u00a0tomto sm\u011bru p\u0159es opakovan\u00e9 urgence a upozorn\u011bn\u00ed \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komo\u0159e st\u00e1le sch\u00e1z\u00ed. Sv\u00fdm jedn\u00e1n\u00edm kontroln\u00ed odd\u011blen\u00ed a kontroln\u00ed rada v\u00a0z\u00e1sad\u011b obch\u00e1z\u00ed \u00fastavn\u011b a mezin\u00e1rodn\u00edmi smlouvami zakotven\u00fd z\u00e1kaz sebeobvi\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n

    8)<\/strong> Nov\u00e1 \u00faprava tzv. \u201ereklamy\u201c advok\u00e1t\u016f, zejm\u00e9na direct mailingu a dal\u0161\u00edch forem adresn\u00e9 reklamy.<\/p>\n

    OD\u016eVODN\u011aN\u00cd: \u010cesk\u00e1 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komora tvrd\u00ed, \u017ee adresn\u00e9 nab\u00edzen\u00ed slu\u017eeb klient\u016fm je ned\u016fstojn\u00e9 advok\u00e1ta, a proto takov\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed nep\u0159ipou\u0161t\u00ed a trest\u00e1. Pamatuji doby, kdy \u010cAK nedovolovala advok\u00e1t\u016fm, aby m\u011bli sv\u00e9 webov\u00e9 str\u00e1nky, proto\u017ee to bylo \u201epodb\u00edzen\u00ed se klientele.\u201c Mimochodem, z\u00a0tohoto omylu jsem \u010cAK vyvedla v\u00a0l\u00e9t\u011b 2000 j\u00e1 a byla to moje z\u00e1sadn\u00ed intervence, kter\u00e1 p\u0159ivedla \u010cAK ke zm\u011bn\u011b postoje. Nyn\u00ed je situace obdobn\u00e1. Od roku 2000, kdy \u010cAK do\u0161la (pod m\u00fdm n\u00e1tlakem) k\u00a0n\u00e1zoru, \u017ee nemoci m\u00edt webov\u00e9 str\u00e1nky za situace, kdy je maj\u00ed advok\u00e1ti prakticky v\u0161ech tehdej\u0161\u00edch \u010dlensk\u00fdch st\u00e1t\u016f Evropsk\u00e9 unie je faktick\u00e1 sebediskriminace \u010desk\u00fdch advok\u00e1t\u016f, se situace na poli pr\u00e1va neuv\u011b\u0159iteln\u011b zkomplikovala. Hledat dnes pr\u00e1vn\u00edka \u2013 specialistu za sou\u010dasn\u00fdch podm\u00ednek restrikce inzerce je obdobn\u00e9, jako hledat specialistu na konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed typ operace v\u00a0nemocnici za dve\u0159mi, na kter\u00fdch je naps\u00e1no \u201echirurgie\u201c. Regulace t\u00e9to \u201ereklamy\u201c jde p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm k\u00a0t\u00ed\u017ei klient\u016fm, kdy se velmi \u0161patn\u011b dop\u00e1tr\u00e1vaj\u00ed \u2013 i za pomoc\u00ed internetu \u2013 skute\u010dn\u00fdch specialist\u016f na konkr\u00e9tn\u00ed probl\u00e9m. Tak zvan\u00e1 \u201ed\u016fstojnost\u201c advok\u00e1ta je p\u011bstov\u00e1na na \u00fakor slu\u017eeb pro ob\u010dany. Co\u017e je velmi konzistentn\u00ed s\u00a0v\u00fdtkami, kter\u00e9 jsem uvedla shora.<\/p>\n

    V\u00e1\u017een\u00e1 pan\u00ed p\u0159edsedkyn\u011b,<\/strong><\/p>\n

    V\u00fdtek, kter\u00e9 m\u00e1m v\u016f\u010di \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komo\u0159e, by se na\u0161lo podstatn\u011b v\u00edce a nepochybuji o tom, \u017ee kolegov\u00e9 \u2013 advok\u00e1ti \u2013 p\u0159idaj\u00ed dal\u0161\u00ed okruhy t\u00e9mat, kter\u00e9 bude nezbytn\u00e9 na mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u00e9m sn\u011bmu prodiskutovat. J\u00e1 se v\u0161ak spokoj\u00edm s\u00a0t\u011bmi, kter\u00e9 jsem uvedla j\u00e1. Douf\u00e1m, \u017ee m\u00e9 \u017e\u00e1dosti o svol\u00e1n\u00ed mimo\u0159\u00e1dn\u00e9ho sn\u011bmu a projedn\u00e1n\u00ed mnou v\u00fd\u0161e navr\u017een\u00fdch bod\u016f vyhov\u00edte Vy osobn\u011b i cel\u00e9 P\u0159edstavenstvo \u010cAK v\u00a0nejkrat\u0161\u00edm mo\u017en\u00e9m term\u00ednu.<\/p>\n

    Jeliko\u017e je ot\u00e1zka postaven\u00ed advok\u00e1ta v\u00a0r\u00e1mci \u010desk\u00e9ho justi\u010dn\u00edho syst\u00e9mu ot\u00e1zkou ve\u0159ejnou, dovoluji si V\u00e1m ozn\u00e1mit, \u017ee tento dopis zve\u0159ejn\u00edm a v\u00a0r\u00e1mci toho vyzvu zejm\u00e9na advok\u00e1ty k\u00a0dal\u0161\u00ed otev\u0159en\u00e9 diskusi na tato i na dal\u0161\u00ed t\u00e9mata.<\/p>\n

    Z\u00e1rove\u0148 si V\u00e1s dovoluji po\u017e\u00e1dat, abyste m\u016fj dopis uve\u0159ejnila na webov\u00fdch str\u00e1nk\u00e1ch Advok\u00e1tn\u00edho den\u00edku.<\/p>\n

    S\u00a0pozdravem,<\/p>\n

    \"\"<\/figure>\n

    JUDr. Kl\u00e1ra A. Samkov\u00e1, Ph.D.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 Advok\u00e1tka \u010d. 3005, reg. od 1. 1. 1994.<\/p>\n

    Na v\u011bdom\u00ed: Ing. Andrej Babi\u0161, p\u0159edseda vl\u00e1dy \u010cR, \u00da\u0159ad vl\u00e1dy<\/p>\n

    \n

    [1]<\/a>\u00a0K\u00a0tomu na p\u0159\u00edklad:\u00a0https:\/\/www.irozhlas.cz\/zpravy-domov\/komora-prihlizela-jak-nas-advokatka-obrala-o-desitky-milionu-podezreni_2510130500_hrk<\/a><\/p>\n

    [2]<\/a>\u00a0Viz:\u00a0https:\/\/www.idnes.cz\/zpravy\/domaci\/ceska-advokatni-komora-monika-novotna-justice-soud-digitalizace-advokacie.A260115_886781_praha-zpravy_svm?<\/a><\/p>\n

    [3]<\/a>\u00a0Viz\u00a0http:\/\/www.ceska-justice.cz\/2015\/09\/projev-predsedy-martina-vychopene-ke-25-vyroci-cak\/<\/a><\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    P\u0159edsedkyn\u011b P\u0159edstavenstva \u010cesk\u00e9 advok\u00e1tn\u00ed komory JUDr. Monika Novotn\u00e1 rozeslala v\u0161em advok\u00e1t\u016fm dopis, pro\u010d mus\u00ed zcela…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":103252,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[6],"tags":[5548,45,1412,1738],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103251"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=103251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103251\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/103252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=103251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=103251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.infokuryr.cz\/n\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=103251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}